Medical Devices

Infections Associated with Reprocessed Duodenoscopes


Background

Duodenoscopes are flexible, lighted tubes that are threaded through the mouth, throat, and stomach into the top of the small intestine (duodenum). They are used during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), a potentially life-saving procedure to diagnose and treat problems in the pancreas and bile ducts. In the United States, duodenoscopes are used in more than 500,000 ERCP procedures each year.

Duodenoscopes are complex instruments that contain many small working parts. If not thoroughly cleaned and disinfected, tissue or fluid from one patient can remain in a duodenoscope when it is used on a subsequent patient. In rare cases, this can lead to patient-to-patient transmission of infection.

In fall 2013, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) alerted the FDA to a potential association between multi-drug resistant bacteria and duodenoscopes. Upon further investigation, it became clear that these cases of infection were occurring despite confirmation that the users were following proper manufacturer cleaning and disinfection or sterilization instructions.

Back to Top Arrow


FDA’s Ongoing Activities

Duodenoscopes are critical to diagnosing and treating severe, often life-threatening diseases. While the overwhelming proportion of procedures with these devices are carried out safely and effectively, the FDA takes the risk of infection very seriously and is working intensively to address it.

Ensuring the safety of reprocessed medical devices for use in multiple patients is a shared responsibility among the FDA and other federal agencies, public health systems, state and local health departments, medical device manufacturers, health care facilities, professional societies and others. The FDA is actively engaged with many of these stakeholder groups to better understand the causes and risk factors for transmission of infectious agents and develop solutions to minimize patient exposure.

On March 9, 2018, the FDA issued Warning Letters to all three manufacturers (Fujifilm Medical Systems USA, Inc, Olympus Medical Systems Corporation, Pentax of America), who make duodenoscopes sold in the U.S. for failure to provide sufficient data to address the postmarket surveillance studies requirements under Section 522 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act). The FDA takes these violations very seriously and will continue to monitor these manufacturers to ensure they take appropriate corrective action and this important public health information is obtained.

On February 26, 2018, the FDA, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), American Society for Microbiology (ASM) together with other endoscope culturing experts released voluntary standardized protocols for duodenoscope surveillance sampling and culturing. These protocols are an update to the Interim Duodenoscope Surveillance Protocol released by CDC in March 2015, and address the concerns regarding validation of duodenoscope culturing protocols raised in ASM’s April 2015 Policy Statement on Culturing of Duodenoscopes. 

For health care facilities that choose to implement duodenoscope surveillance sampling and culturing, these protocols can be used to help monitor the quality of a facility’s endoscope reprocessing procedures. Adequate monitoring may reduce the risk of infection.  

The FDA continues to actively:

  • Evaluate information from multiple sources, including medical device adverse event reports submitted to the FDA, the medical literature, the health care community, professional medical societies, international public health agencies, federal partners and state and local governments.
  • Communicate recommendations to health care providers and end users to mitigate the risk associated with infection transmission. The FDA's communications are included in Additional Resources.
  • Work with industry as they modify and validate their reprocessing instructions to enhance the safety margin of the methods used to clean, disinfect and sterilize the duodenoscope, specifically all three companies that manufacture duodenoscopes marketed in the US and manufacturers of Automated Endoscope Reprocessors (AERs) marketed in the US that reprocess duodenoscopes as stated in their labeling.
  • Investigate firms that manufacturer duodenoscopes (Olympus, Fuji, Pentax). The FDA issued 483s and Warning Letters describing violations to the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act to all three manufacturers and 510(k) status letters to two duodenoscope manufacturers (Fuji and Pentax).
  • Evaluate the effectiveness of current duodenoscope reprocessing instructions in health care settings. On October 5, 2015, the FDA ordered the three companies that manufacturer duodenoscopes marketed in the U.S. (Olympus, Fuji, Pentax) to conduct 522 postmarket surveillance studies so the Agency can better understand how duodenoscopes are reprocessed in real-world settings.
  • Collaborate with health care facilities, professional societies and federal partners to evaluate additional strategies for mitigating infections associated with duodenoscopes.

The FDA will continue to provide additional information to the public as our investigation continues.

Back to Top Arrow


May 2015 Advisory Committee Meeting

On May 14-15, 2015, the FDA convened the Gastroenterology-Urology Devices Panel of the Medical Devices Advisory Committee Meeting to seek expert scientific and clinical opinion related to reprocessing of duodenoscopes based on available scientific information. Meeting materials, including presentations and a meeting summarydisclaimer icon are available on the FDA’s panel websitedisclaimer icon.

The panel was comprised of health care, consumer and industry representatives. Over the course of the two-day meeting, panel members heard presentations from the followingkey stakeholders including health care providers from the US and other countries, various subject matter experts, industry, and the general public.

Following two days of presentations, testimony and other input, panel participants were asked to answer questions focused on duodenoscope and AER safety and effectiveness, notably strategies to promote adherence to reprocessing instructions, the CDC’s Interim Duodenoscope Surveillance Protocol, and risk communication. From the Advisory Committee meeting discussions, potential strategies emerged in the following areas:

1. Manual Cleaning and Human Factors

Both panel members and meeting participants emphasized that manual cleaning prior to disinfection or sterilization is critical to effective reprocessing. To ensure that manual cleaning is performed consistently and accurately, the panel recommended:

  • strengthening competency training for reprocessing staff in health care facility reprocessing units; and
  • incorporating Human Factors testing when developing reprocessing instructions

It is important to consider the device, end user and use environment when developing reprocessing instructions. Thus Human Factors testing plays an important role in ensuring that end users will be able to understand and correctly follow the reprocessing instructions in the labeling. The FDA’s Reprocessing Final Guidance introduces Human Factors and provides recommendations regarding Human Factors in developing reprocessing instructions.

2. Device Design

Meeting participants stressed the importance that duodenoscopes be designed to enable meticulous cleaning and disinfection or sterilization and urged industry to design duodenoscopes that enable thorough cleaning and effective reprocessing through device disassembly or disposable parts.

Based on the FDA’s experience reviewing reprocessed devices and research conducted by the Agency and others, the FDA has identified design features that facilitate cleaning, disinfection and sterilization and reduce the likelihood of retaining debris, which are outlined on the Factors Affecting Quality of Reprocessing webpage.

3. Microbiological Culturing of Duodenoscopes

Health care facilities may perform microbiologic culturing, which involves sampling duodenoscope channels and the distal end of the scope and culturing those samples to identify any bacterial contamination that may be present on the scope after reprocessing.

The panel discussed CDC’s Interim Duodenoscope Surveillance Protocol that was released in March 2015 and recommended that additional data and validation testing is needed to demonstrate the methodology is robust and demonstrates consistent and reliable culturing results before health care facilities can incorporate as a best practice.

4. Supplemental Measures to Enhance Duodenoscope Reprocessing

At the Advisory Committee meeting, representatives from several health care facilities and the panel discussed additional strategies that they have implemented to reduce the risk of infection transmission, such as: microbiological culturing, sterilization, use of a liquid chemical sterilant processing system and repeat high-level disinfection. In each case, staff applied these supplemental methods in addition to meticulous cleaning as part of strict adherence to the manufacturer’s reprocessing instructions.

The FDA’s August 2015 Safety Communication provides a list of supplemental duodenoscope reprocessing measures that emerged from the Advisory Committee meeting. Hospitals and health care facilities that utilize duodenoscopes can, in addition to meticulously following manufacturer reprocessing instructions, take one or more of these additional steps to further reduce the risk of infection and increase the safety of these medical devices.

While the risk of infection transmission cannot be completely eliminated, the benefits of these devices continue to outweigh the risks in appropriately selected patients.

Back to Top Arrow


Additional Resources

 

Page Last Updated: 03/23/2018
Note: If you need help accessing information in different file formats, see Instructions for Downloading Viewers and Players.
Language Assistance Available: Español | 繁體中文 | Tiếng Việt | 한국어 | Tagalog | Русский | العربية | Kreyòl Ayisyen | Français | Polski | Português | Italiano | Deutsch | 日本語 | فارسی | English