Statement from FDA Commissioner Scott Gottlieb, M.D., on the FDA’s new effort for developing and class labeling of in vitro companion diagnostics for classes of oncology therapeutic products
- For Immediate Release:
- December 06, 2018
- Statement From:
Statement AuthorLeadership RoleCommissioner of Food and Drugs - Food and Drug Administration
One challenge we face right now, when it comes to developing diagnostics that can help target the delivery of cancer drugs, is the way these diagnostics are sometimes labeled.
When an in vitro diagnostic test gets approved, it’s often based on the results of studies with one specific drug. As a consequence, the labeling of the test often reflects the use of that diagnostic in conjunction with just one drug. And, in turn, the drug can reflect the use of that medicine in conjunction with just one diagnostic test.
But this often isn’t the way medicine is practiced and the way patients receive care.
This sometimes narrow labeling that ties a drug to a specific diagnostic test happens even in cases where the diagnostic test is applicable to all drugs in a specific class of cancer medicines. This is a challenge given the way cancer care is emerging. Increasingly, new drugs are targeting specific molecular markers that drive the growth and spread of cancer. Sometimes, multiple drugs in a class of medicines target the same marker in a largely similar fashion.
In these cases, a diagnostic test that helps guide the delivery of one drug can be relevant in guiding the use of all drugs in that class of molecularly-targeted medicines. The FDA intends to address this opportunity and the challenges posed by the current regulatory approach to how these drug and diagnostic systems are labeled for use.
With a new draft guidance document that the FDA issued today, our aim is to make it easier to get class labeling on diagnostic tests for oncology therapeutic products, where scientifically appropriate. Today’s draft guidance notes that in some cases, if evidence is sufficient to conclude that the companion diagnostic is appropriate for use with a specific group or class of therapeutic products, the companion diagnostic’s intended use should name the specific group or class of therapeutic products, rather than specific products.
The policy reflected in this guidance, when finalized, will make it easier for providers to use the same test in helping guide the use of a class of oncology therapeutic products, rather than one specific oncology therapeutic product within that class. The guidance will help guide test developers who could use the data generated from the study of an approved or cleared diagnostic test that’s evaluated in relation to just one oncology therapeutic product in a class of molecularly-targeted oncology therapeutic products to then extrapolate the use of that same approved or cleared diagnostic test to the entire oncology therapeutic product class.
We’re advancing this guidance to promote better patient care. We also recognize that there are commercial challenges for companion diagnostics. And so, we’re trying to help sponsors more efficiently meet the requirements to support broader labeling. To advance these goals, the proposed guidance will describe considerations for the development and labeling of in vitro companion diagnostic devices to support the indicated uses of multiple oncology therapeutic products.
Today’s guidance adds to the public health goals we’re aiming to achieve.
A companion diagnostic is an in vitro diagnostic device that provides information that is essential for the safe and effective use of a corresponding therapeutic product. Right now, trials designed to support approval of a specific therapeutic product and a specific companion diagnostic have led to companion diagnostic labels that reference only a specific therapeutic product or products.
As noted, that specificity in labeling can limit a potentially broader use of a companion diagnostic that may be scientifically appropriate. In some cases, there are multiple companion diagnostics approved or cleared by the FDA to detect the same mutations in the same specimen type. Similarly, in some cases, there are multiple FDA-approved therapeutics within a specific group or class of oncology therapeutic products (i.e., drugs that are approved for use in the same indications, including the same mutation(s) and the same disease). The result is that, in some cases, not all of the oncology therapeutic products in a specific group or class are being included on all of the labels of approved or cleared companion diagnostics to detect mutations that define the specific group or class.
We’re concerned that the current situation is not optimal for patient care because a clinician may need to order a different companion diagnostic (i.e., one that includes other therapeutic products on the label), obtain an additional biopsy from a patient, or both, to have additional therapy treatment options. This is among the reasons why we’re looking to work with sponsors to pursue labeling a companion diagnostic to reference a specific group or class of oncology therapeutic products, when the evidence would support expanding the indication, for instance to include a specific group or class of therapeutic products, rather than specific products.
In oncology, precision medicine aims to match therapeutic products to those patients (and only those patients) who will positively respond to that therapeutic product, to maximize benefits and minimize risks from the therapeutic product received. Companion diagnostics inform both the development and the approved use of therapeutic products.
These products could enable greater flexibility for clinicians in choosing the most appropriate therapeutic product based on a patient’s biomarker status. It could also help advance better patient care.
When it’s scientifically appropriate, the FDA supports developers of companion diagnostics to develop their products (or pursue broader labeling for approved companion diagnostics) in a way that results in broader labeling for their diagnostic products. This includes, for example, labeling that identifies a specific group or class of oncology therapeutic products. This new policy will help advance these goals, by making it more efficient to achieve class labeling for diagnostic tests used in oncology. The new guidance is part of a much broader effort by the FDA to advance tools that help personalize care for patients. The opportunity has arrived, through science, to make sure that the right patient is getting the right treatment at the right time. Through more modern policies that enable the efficient translation of these technologies we can help more patients live better lives.
The FDA, an agency within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, protects the public health by assuring the safety, effectiveness, and security of human and veterinary drugs, vaccines and other biological products for human use, and medical devices. The agency also is responsible for the safety and security of our nation’s food supply, cosmetics, dietary supplements, products that give off electronic radiation, and for regulating tobacco products.
- Stephanie Caccomo