U.S. flag An official website of the United States government

U.S. Food and Drug Administration
  1. Home
  2. Inspections, Compliance, Enforcement, and Criminal Investigations
  3. Compliance Actions and Activities
  4. Warning Letters
  5. Derby Paradise, Inc. - 525034 - 07/20/2017
  1. Warning Letters

WARNING LETTER

Derby Paradise, Inc. MARCS-CMS 525034 —

Product:
Food & Beverages
Seafood/Seafood Product
Recipient:
Recipient Name
Ms. Juliana Allotey
Derby Paradise, Inc.
Derby Paradise, Inc.

25755 148th Drive
Rosedale, NY 11422
United States

Issuing Office:
New York District Office

United States

 

WARNING LETTER
CMS # 525034
 
July 21, 2017
 
 
VIA UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
DELIVERY SIGNATURE REQUEST
 
 
Ms. Juliana Allotey, President
Derby Paradise, Inc.
25755 148th Drive
Rosedale, NY 11422
 
Dear Ms. Allotey:
 
On March 2 and 17, 2017, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) inspected your seafood importer establishment, Derby Paradise, Inc.1 located at 25755 148thDrive, Rosedale, NY. We found that you have serious violations of the seafood Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point (HACCP) regulation, Title 21, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 123 (21 CFR Part 123). The specific requirements for imported fish and fishery products are set out in 21 CFR 123.12. As an importer of fish or fishery products, you must operate in accordance with the requirements of Part 123. In accordance with 21 CFR 123.12(d), there must be evidence that all fish and fishery products offered for entry into the United States have been processed under conditions that comply with 21 CFR Part 123. If assurances do not exist that the imported fish or fishery product has been processed under conditions that are equivalent to those required of domestic processors under 21 CFR Part 123, the fish or fishery products will appear to be adulterated under Section 402(a)(4) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act), 21 U.S.C. § 342(a)(4) and will be denied entry. Because our inspection identified serious violations for 21 CFR Part 123, your canned tuna fish in sunflower oil with pepper are adulterated under Section 402(a)(4)of the Act (21 U.S.C. § 342(a)(4)), in that they have been prepared, packed, or held under insanitary conditions whereby they may have been rendered injurious to health. You may find the Act, the seafood HACCP regulation and the Fish and Fisheries Products Hazards & Controls Guidance through links in FDA's home page at www.fda.gov.
 
Your significant violation was as follows:
 
You must implement an affirmative step which ensures that the fish and fishery product(s) you import are processed in accordance with the seafood HACCP Regulation, to comply with 21 CFR123.12(a)(2)(ii). However, your firm did not perform an affirmative step for your canned tuna fish in sunflower oil with pepper manufactured by (b)(4).
 
We may take further action if you do not promptly correct these violations. For instance, we may take further action to refuse admission of your imported fish or fishery products under Section 801(a) of the Act (21 U.S.C. § 381(a)), including placing them on "detention without physical examination," seize your product(s) and/or enjoin your firm from further violating the Act.
 
You should respond in writing within fifteen (15) working days from your receipt of this letter. Your response should outline the specific things you are doing to correct these violations. You should include in your response documentation, such as corrected HACCP and importer verification records and records that document the performance and results of your firm’s affirmative steps, or other useful information that would assist us in evaluating your corrections. If you cannot complete all corrections before you respond, you should explain the reason for your delay and state when you will correct any remaining violations.
 
Section 743 of the Act (21 U.S.C. § 379j-31) authorizes FDA to assess and collect fees to cover FDA’s costs for certain activities, including re-inspection-related costs. A re-inspection is one or more inspections conducted subsequent to an inspection that identified noncompliance materially related to a food safety requirement of the Act, specifically to determine whether compliance has been achieved. Re-inspection- related costs means all expenses, including administrative expenses, incurred in connection with FDA’s arranging, conducting, and evaluating the results of the re-inspection and assessing and collecting the re- inspection fees (21 U.S.C. § 379j-31(a)(2)(B)). FDA will assess and collect fees for re-inspection-related costs from the responsible party for the domestic facility. The inspection noted in this letter identified noncompliance materially related to a food safety requirement of the Act. Accordingly, FDA may assess fees to cover any re-inspection-related costs.
 
This letter may not list all the violations at your facility. You are responsible for ensuring that your seafood importer establishment operates in compliance with the Act and the seafood HACCP regulation (21 CFR Part 123). You also have a responsibility to use procedures to prevent further violations of the Act and all applicable regulations for the fish or fishery products that you import into the United States.
 
Please send your reply to the Food and Drug Administration, 158-15 Liberty Ave., Jamaica, NY 11433, Attention: Joseph Sullivan, Compliance Officer. If you have questions regarding any issues in this letter, please contact Joseph Sullivan at 718-662-5687.
 
 
Sincerely,
/S/ 
Anna Alexander
Acting Program Division Director
Division of Northeast Imports
 
___________________________________________
1 FDA notes that in certain documents presented to the firm, including FDA Forms 482 and 483, Derby Paradise, Inc., was incorrectly referred to as “Derby Paradise, LLC.” We use the correct corporate ending in this Warning Letter.
 

 

 
Back to Top