Docket Management
Docket: 95N-0304 - Dietary Supplements Containing Ephedrine Alkaloids
Comment Number: EC -565

Accepted - Volume 307

Comment Record
Commentor Mr. Ted Quiroz Date/Time 2003-03-24 09:42:16
Organization Whole Foods Market
Category Individual

Comments for FDA General
1. General Comments Dear Sir/Madam, I work for a health food store in Plantation, FL,U.S.A., and have been in the natural products industry for 12 years. Both our customers and I appreciate the signifigance of the Dietary Health and Education Act of 1994 with regard to protecting our right to choose how we care for ourselves. I am concerned that the FDA has only just begun to implement key sections of DSHEA. For instance, the agency recently released its proposed good manufacturing practices for the industry, and yet is immediately calling for suggestions for increased legislative authority in order to better regulate the supplement industry. Shouldn't you first give DSHEA a chance to work as it was intended to before calling for new laws? Please also don't overlook that DSHEA actually increased FDA's enforcement powers. FDA can seize a dietary supplement if it presents an unreasonable or signifigant risk of illness or injury. In addition, the government can stop the sale of an entire class of dietary supplements if they pose an imminent public health hazard. In sum, I agree with the former FDA commissioner, Dr.Jane Henney, that DSHEA provides FDA with the necessary legal authority to protect public health. DSHEA improved consumer access to dietary supplements and information about them, while increasing consumer protection against unsafe products and false and misleading claims. I strongly support DSHEA and do not think any additional legislative authority is necessary for FDA to regulate ephedra or any other dietary supplement. Sincerely, Ted Quiroz 5802 NW 82 AVE. Tamarac, FL 33321

EC -565