Rosio, Timothy J., M.D. 2/16/11
Department of Health and Human Services
|Public Health Service|
Food and Drug Administration
|Rockville, MD 20857|
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Timothy J. Rosio, MD
4355 Town Center Blvd.
El Dorado Hills, CA 95762
PROPOSAL TO DEBAR
NOTICE OF OPPORTUNITY FOR HEARING
DOCKET No. FDA-2010-N-0472
Dear Dr. Rosio:
This letter is to inform you that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is proposing to issue an order debarring you for a period of four years from providing services in any capacity to a person that has an approved or pending drug product application. FDA bases this proposal on a finding that you were convicted of a misdemeanor under Federal law for conduct relating to the regulation of a drug product under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act), and that the type of conduct that served as the basis for the conviction undermines the process for the regulation of drugs. This letter also offers you an opportunity to request a hearing on this proposal and provides you with the relevant information should you wish to acquiesce to this proposed debarment.
Conduct Related to Conviction
On October 18, 2007, you pleaded guilty to one count of receipt and delivery of a misbranded drug in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 331(c) and one count of misbranding of drugs held for sale in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 331(k). On October 26, 2007, judgment was entered against you in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California on those misdemeanor charges. The underlying facts supporting this conviction are as follows.
At the time of your conviction, you were a licensed physician practicing in the State of California. Between on or about February 23, 2004 and on or about August 26, 2004, in the Eastern District of California, you did receive Botulinum Toxin A (TRI-toxin), a drug from Toxin Research International (TRI), which had been shipped in interstate commerce, from Arizona to your clinic in Folsom, California. The TRI-toxin that you received from TRI was misbranded in that it lacked adequate directions for use in humans. The drug was not approved for use in humans by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Prior to 2009, BOTOX®/BOTOX® Cosmetic, a product manufactured by Allergan, Inc., was the only Botulinum Toxin Type A product licensed by the FDA for use in humans for any indication, including for the temporary improvement in appearance of moderate to severe glabellar lines associated with corrugator and/or procerus muscle activity, commonly described as the treatment of facial wrinkles.1
The drug TRI-toxin's packaging, labeling, and invoices clearly stated "FOR RESEARCH PURPOSES ONLY, NOT FOR HUMAN USE." After receiving the TRI-toxin, you proffered the delivery and caused the delivery of the drug to patients, some on multiple occasions, in the form of injections, for pay and otherwise, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 331(c). Moreover, after receiving the shipments of TRI-toxin, you held the drug for sale as BOTOX®.2 In doing so, you acted in a way that caused the drug to be further misbranded by offering it for sale to the public under the name of another drug, specifically BOTOX®, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 331(k).
Section 306(b)(2)(B)(i)(I) of the Act (21 U.S.C. 335a(b)(2)(B)(i)(I)) permits FDA to debar an individual if FDA finds that the individual has been convicted of a misdemeanor under Federal law for conduct relating to the regulation of drug products under the Act, and if FDA finds that the type of conduct that served as the basis for the conviction undermines the process for the regulation of drugs. You received a misbranded drug and caused its delivery to your patients, and further misbranded or caused the misbranding of a drug in violation of the Act, namely by offering a drug that had not been approved for use, TRI-toxin, for sale to patients under the name of another drug, namely BOTOX®, and then injecting the unapproved drug into patients. FDA, therefore, finds that your misdemeanor conviction for these violations related to the regulation of drug products under the Act, and that this type of conduct, which served as a basis for your conviction, undermines the process for the regulation of drugs because the receipt in interstate commerce of a misbranded drug and the misbranding of a drug are violations of the Act.
The maximum period of debarment under section 306(b)(2)(B)(i)(I) of the Act is five years. 21 U.S.C. 335a(c)(2)(A)(iii). Section 306(c)(3) of the Act (21 U.S.C. 335a(c)(3)) provides six factors for consideration in determining the appropriateness and the period of a permissive debarment. The factors applicable here include: (1) the nature and seriousness of the offense involved, (2) the nature and extent of management participation in this offense; (3) the nature and extent of voluntary steps taken to mitigate the impact on the public of any offense involved; and (4) prior convictions involving matters within the jurisdiction of FDA.
1. Nature and seriousness of the offense.
FDA regulates the manufacture and distribution of drugs in the United States. The FDA also regulates the manufacture and distribution of biologic products, which includes toxins like Botulinum Toxin Type A. As noted above, only one Botulinum Toxin Type A product was licensed by the FDA prior to 2009. FDA licensed BOTOX® in 1991, and approved a supplement for the indication of treatment of glabellar lines in 2002. Products for the latter indication are marketed and labeled as BOTOX® Cosmetic. TRI-toxin has never been licensed or approved by FDA for any use.
In your plea agreement, you admitted to the receipt and delivery of a misbranded drug (namely TRI-toxin) and, after receiving this drug, the delivery of that drug to patients under the name of another drug (namely BOTOX®), some on multiple occasions, in the form of injections, for monetary compensation.3 Despite the warning on TRI-toxin's label, "NOT FOR HUMAN USE," you purchased and used the product on your patients.
FDA finds that your conduct created a risk of injury to consumers due to the use of an unapproved drug, undermined the Agency's oversight of an approved drug product, and seriously undermined the integrity of the Agency's regulation of drug products. Accordingly, FDA considers the nature and seriousness of your conduct as an unfavorable factor.
2. Nature and extent of management participation.
In determining the appropriate period of debarment, FDA also considers the nature and extent of your management participation in the offense, and whether corporate policies and practices encouraged the offense, including whether inadequate institutional controls contributed to the offense. You admitted to ordering the TRI-toxin for use in your practice, and admitted to injecting patients with the drug. As a licensed physician, you held a position of authority where you directed the actions of at least one employee. Your conduct also served as an example for that employee and any other employee of the practice. Therefore, the pattern of conduct you engaged in is considered more serious than if you were an employee. Accordingly, the Agency will consider this as an unfavorable factor.
3. Nature and extent of voluntary steps to mitigate impact on the public
FDA will next consider the nature and extent of voluntary steps to mitigate the impact on the public of any offense involved, including, among other things, full cooperation with any investigations (including extent of disclosure to appropriate authorities of all wrongdoing) and any other actions taken to substantially limit potential or actual adverse effects on the public health. In the sentencing memorandum filed on your behalf in this matter, it is indicated that when the FDA began investigating TRI and ordered a recall of its products you destroyed the remainder of your TRI product in compliance with the recall. Rosio Sent. Mem. at 3, U.S. v. Rosio, Crim. Case No. CR S-075-0225 KJM (E.D. Cal. Oct. 11, 2007). The government did not contest these factual representations. Accordingly, the Agency will consider this as a favorable factor.
4. Prior convictions under this Act or under other Acts involving matters within the jurisdiction of the Food and Drug Administration.
FDA is unaware of any prior convictions. The Agency will consider this as a favorable factor.
Weighing all factors, particularly the nature and seriousness of the conduct underlying your conviction, the Agency has determined that the unfavorable factors far outweigh the favorable factors, and therefore warrant the imposition of a four year permissible debarment in this case.
Proposed Action and Notice of Opportunity for Hearing
Based on the findings discussed above, FDA proposes to issue an order under section 306(b)(2)(B) of the Act (21 U.S.C. 335a(b)(2)(B)) debarring you for a period of four years from providing services in any capacity to a person having an approved or pending drug product application. You were convicted of receipt and delivery of a misbranded drug and misbranding a drug, Federal misdemeanor offenses under the Act. As explained above, these offenses relate to the regulation of drug products under the Act. Furthermore, the conduct that served as the basis for these convictions undermines the process for the regulation of drugs. Based on the factors discussed above, FDA proposes a four-year debarment period.
In accordance with section 306 of the Act and 21 CFR part 12, you are hereby given an opportunity to request a hearing to show why you should not be debarred as proposed in this letter.
If you decide to seek a hearing, you must file the following: (1) on or before 30 days from the date of receipt of this letter, a written notice of appearance and request for hearing; and (2) on or before 60 days from the date of receipt of this letter, the information on which you rely to justify a hearing.
The procedures and requirements governing this notice of opportunity for hearing, a notice of appearance and request for a hearing, information and analyses to justify a hearing, and a grant or denial of a hearing are contained in 21 CFR part 12 and section 306(i) of the Act (21 U.S.C. 335a(i)).
Your failure to file a timely written notice of appearance and request for hearing constitutes an election by you not to use the opportunity for a hearing concerning your debarment and a waiver of any contentions concerning this action. If you do not request a hearing in the manner prescribed by the regulations, FDA will not hold a hearing and will issue a final debarment order as proposed in this letter.
A request for a hearing may not rest upon mere allegations or denials but must present specific facts showing that there is a genuine and substantial issue of fact that requires a hearing. A hearing will be denied if the data and information you submit, even if accurate, are insufficient to justify the factual determination urged. If it conclusively appears from the face of the information and factual analyses in your request for a hearing that there is no genuine and substantial issue of fact that precludes the order of debarment, the Commissioner of Food and Drugs will deny your request for a hearing and enter a final order of debarment.
You should understand that the facts underlying your conviction are not at issue in this proceeding. The only material issue is whether you were convicted as alleged in this notice and, if so, whether, as a matter of law, this conviction permits your debarment under section 306(b)(2)(B) of the Act (21 U.S.C. 335a(b)(2)(B) as proposed in this letter.
Your request for a hearing, including any information or factual analyses relied on to justify a hearing, must be identified with Docket No. FDA-2010-N-0472 and sent to the Division of Dockets Management, Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Room 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. You must file four copies of all submissions pursuant to this notice of opportunity for hearing. The public availability of information in these submissions is governed by 21 CFR 10.20G). Publicly available submissions may be seen in the Division of Dockets Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
You also may notify the Secretary that you acquiesce to this proposed debarment. If you decide to acquiesce, your debarment shall commence upon such notification to the Secretary in accordance with section 306(c)(2)(B) (21 U.S.C. § 335a(c)(2)(B)).
This notice is issued under section 306 of the Act (21 U.S.C. 335a) and under authority delegated to the Director, Office of Enforcement within the Food and Drug Administration.
Howard R. Sklamberg
Office of Enforcement
Office of Regulatory Affairs
1 On July 31, 2009, FDA approved a supplemental application to the license for BOTOX®/BOTOX® Cosmetic, which in relevant part changed the established, or proper name of the biological product from Botulinum Toxin Type A to http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/appletter/2009/103000s5209s52101ltr.pdf. This non-proprietary name change is not material to these purposes, and for the sake of consistency with the related criminal proceedings, the product will continue to be referred to in this letter as Botulinum Toxin Type A.
2 It is not clear from the criminal proceedings whether you held the drug for sale as BOTOX® Cosmetic or BOTOX®. This difference is not relevant for these purposes because the products are identical with the exception of different labeling. For the sake of consistency with the related criminal proceedings, the product used will continue to be referred to in this letter as "BOTOX."
3 FDA licensed BOTOX®/BOTOX® Cosmetic pursuant to the Agency's authority set forth in section 351(a) of the Public Health Service Act (PHSA), 42 U.S.C. § 262(a). The misbranding provisions of the Act apply to products licensed under the PHSA. See 42 U.S.C. § 2620) ("[t]he Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. § 301 et seq.) applies to biological product subject to regulation under this section").