Chapter 1
Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research
Last Update: August 07, 2003 |
| |
Biologic Products
Warning Letter Issued to Plasma Center
Failure to Follow SOPs Results in Warning Letter
|
The FDA's Baltimore District Office issued a Warning Letter to the President of
Sera-Tec Biologicals Limited Partnership, on January 18, 2001. The Warning Letter was
issued following an FDA inspection of their Richmond, Virginia plasma center, on November
29 through December 19, 2000. The Warning Letter cited the firm for the following
deviations: failure to maintain and/or follow adequate written Standard Operating
Procedures including all steps to be followed in the collection, processing, storage, and
distribution of blood and blood products; and failure to maintain and/or follow adequate
procedures for conducting a thorough investigation, including the conclusions and
follow-up of any unexplained discrepancy or the failure of a lot or unit to meet any of
its specifications.
Warning Letter Issued to Biologics Firm
The FDA's Center for Blood Evaluation and Research issued a Warning Letter to Bayer
Corporation, Biologics Product Division, Berkeley, California, on July 24, 2001. FDA
conducted inspections at Bayer's manufacturing facilities located in Clayton, North
Carolina, between September 25 and November 12, 2000, and March 13 and 21, 2001, and in
Berkeley, California, between November 6 and December 7, 2000. During these inspections,
FDA investigators documented violations of the FD&C Act and deviations from the Code
of Federal Regulations, Parts 210 and 211 and 600-680.
These deviations included: failure to establish and follow written procedures for the
cleaning and maintenance of equipment, including utensils, used in the manufacture,
processing, packing or holding of a drug product; failure to ensure that reprocessed
batches of product will conform with all established standards, specifications, and
characteristics; failure to maintain and/or follow written procedures for the production
and process control designed to assure that the drug products have the identity, strength,
quality and purity that they purport or are represented to possess and to assure that such
procedures, including any changes, are drafted, reviewed, and approved by the appropriate
organizational units and reviewed and approved by quality control.
Allergen Manufacturer Receives Warning
Firm to Assess Stability of Drug Products Seven Lots Recalled
|
The FDA's Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research issued a Warning Letter on
January 23, 2001, to Allergy Laboratories of Ohio, Inc., Columbus, Ohio. During an
inspection on September 19 - 26, 2000, an FDA investigator documented violations of the
FD&C Act and deviations of 21 C.F.R. Parts 210-211 and 600-680. These deviations
included the following: failure to establish testing programs designed to assess the
stability characteristics of drug products; failure to establish the effectiveness or
verify the suitability of all testing methods under actual conditions of use; failure to
establish written procedures for a review of records associated with a batch, in that
annual reviews of records were not performed; and failure to visually examine reserve
samples from representative lots or batches for deterioration, at least once a year.
During the inspection, the investigator documented at least seven lots of extracts that
were recalled after errors were discovered in either the concentration calculations or
expiration dates.
Recall of Biologic Ointment
On March 12, 2001, the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research announced that
Advance Biofactures Corporation (ABC) in Lynbrook, New York, was initiating a recall of
two lots of Collagenase Santyl Ointment, 30 gram tubes. The firm initiated the recall
because the product was found to be super potent using a universal extraction correction
factor to determine the potency of the product. This method is part of an approved
corrective action plan approved by the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research. This
product is a licensed biologic product, and has a four-year expiration date.
|
|
|
|
Bioresearch Monitoring
Warning Letter Issued to Institutional Review Board
FDA Warns - No New Studies and No New Subjects May Be Admitted
to Ongoing Studies
|
On August 13, 2001, the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research issued a Warning
Letter to ImmunoGenetics Investigational Review Board, Birmingham, Alabama, in response to
an inspection from June 28 - July 9, 2001. The inspection was conducted by the FDA's New
Orleans District Office Nashville Branch. The Warning Letter addressed several problems
that were discovered during the inspection including (but not limited to) the following:
lack of written procedures; failure to properly review research; failure to adequately
review and approve informed consent forms; and failure to ensure that protocol changes
were not implemented until reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB).
The Warning Letter further advised the IRB that no new studies that are subject to
DHHS/FDA jurisdiction are to be approved by the IRB, and no new subjects may be admitted
to ongoing studies that are subject to DHHS/FDA jurisdiction (previously approved by the
IRB).
Clinical Investigator Receives Warning Letter
The FDA's Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research issued a Warning Letter to
Michael R. K. Jacoby, M.D., Mercy Ruan Neurology Clinic, Des Moines, Iowa. An inspection
conducted on November 3, 2000, as part of FDA's Bioresearch Monitoring Program disclosed
serious deficiencies from the Code of Federal Regulation 21 C.F.R. Parts 321 and 50. These
deviations included the following: failure to promptly report to the Institutional Review
Board (IRB) all changes in the research activity; failure to obtain informed consent in
accordance with the provisions of 21 C.F.R. Part 50; failure to ensure that the
investigation is conducted according to the investigational plan; and failure to prepare
and maintain complete and accurate case histories.
Investigator at Research Center Warned
Investigator Fails to Submit Accurate Reports to IRB
|
An investigator from the FDA's Philadelphia District Office and a Medical Officer from
the FDA's Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research visited the headquarters of the
Institute for Human Gene Therapy at the University of Pennsylvania. The inspection was
conducted from November 20, 1999, to January 19, 2000. Based on information obtained
during the investigation, FDA determined that Mark L. Batshaw, M.D., Children's National
Medical Center, Washington, D.C., violated regulations governing the proper conduct of
clinical studies involving investigational new drugs.
The FDA issued a Warning Letter to Dr. Batshaw dated November 30, 2000, which
identified the following violations: failure to ensure that an investigation is conducted
according to the investigational plan; failure to assure that the Institutional Review
Board (IRB) would be responsible for the initial and continuing review of the clinical
study by failing to submit accurate reports regarding the safety of the study and failing
to accurately and completely identify changes to the protocol for the IRB's review and
evaluation; and failure to obtain informed consent in accordance with the provisions of 21
C.F.R. Part 50.
|
|
|
|
Blood
Warning Letter Issued for Failure to Screen Donors
FDA Finds Firm Storing Blood at Room Temperature
|
The FDA's Chicago District Office issued a Warning Letter on August 3, 2001, to Coral
Blood Services, Inc., Chicago, Illinois. This firm is an unlicensed blood bank that has
only been in operation since June 1, 2001. An FDA inspection of the firm on July 11 and
18, 2001, revealed deviations from 21 C.F.R. Parts 600 - 680. The Warning Letter cited the
firm for storing collected units of whole blood at room temperature for at least the
duration of the collection day.
In addition, the Warning Letter cited Coral Blood Services for its practice of
separating red blood cells from the whole blood several days after collection, and
processing at room temperature which causes the temperature of the blood to increase. In
addition, the firm was cited for not recording the answers to all of the questions
required to be asked of prospective donors, and for failure to elicit sufficient
information from donors to determine if they had traveled to areas at risk for malaria.
Warning Issued for Failure to Follow CGMPs for Blood Products
On August 27, 2001, the FDA's Florida District Office issued a Warning Letter to Lee
Memorial Health System, Ft. Myers, Florida. An FDA inspection of this unlicensed blood
bank on June 11 - 20, 2001, documented serious violations of the FD&C Act and CGMP
regulations for blood and blood components. For example, the firm failed to determine,
among other things, the suitability of persons to serve as whole blood donors; failed to
adequately train personnel and to maintain employee training records; failed to establish
and implement a written quality assurance program; failed to establish written procedures
for receiving and evaluating information on possible product deviations; failed to
establish written procedures for review and evaluation of post donation information; and
failed to maintain adequate written procedures for performing Rapid Plasma Regin test [a
seriologic test for syphilis] in accordance with the manufacturer's directions.
Firm Fails to Notify Physician of Donor Reaction
On March 29, 2001, the FDA's Seattle District Office issued a Warning Letter to the CEO
of SeraCare Inc., Los Angeles, California. The FDA conducted an inspection of one of the
firm's facilities on 2802 Hoyt Avenue, Everett, Washington, on February 5 - 9, 12 and 14,
2001. During the inspection FDA investigators documented serious violations of the
FD&C Act and 21 C.F.R. Parts 600-800. These deviations included the following: failure
to maintain and follow written Standard Operating Procedures to include all steps to be
followed in the collection, processing, testing, storage, and distribution of blood and
blood components. For example, the firm failed to notify the center physician/physician
substitute of a donor reaction as required by SeraCare's Standard Operating Procedures. In
addition, the firm failed to assure that all personnel have the training and experience
necessary for the competent performance of their assigned functions.
Hospital Blood Bank Receives Warning Letter
The FDA's Cincinnati District Office issued a Warning Letter to a hospital blood bank
at Aultman Health Foundation, Canton, Ohio. An FDA inspection of the facility from June
5-6, 2001, disclosed deviations from the FD&C Act and 21 C.F.R. Part 606. The FDA
investigator's findings included the following: failure to calibrate or properly calibrate
equipment used to determine donor suitability; failure to calibrate equipment used in
blood component preparation; failure to follow written Standard Operating Procedures;
failure to review all records and failure to investigate errors prior to the release of
blood products.
FDA Inspection Reveals Firm Failed to Maintain Accurate Records
The FDA's Atlanta District Office issued a Warning Letter to the Director, Quality
Assurance-Compliance, Seramed, Inc., d/b/a Aventis Bio Services, Knoxville, Tennessee, on
June 29, 2001. An FDA inspection on April 19-20 and May 30 - June 6, 2001, of the firm's
facility in Greenville, South Carolina, disclosed violations of the FD&C Act and 21
C.F.R. Parts 600-680. The investigator documented the following deviations: failure to
maintain and/or follow adequate written Standard Operating Procedures to include all steps
to be followed in the collection, processing, storage, and distribution of blood and blood
products; failure of personnel to have a thorough understanding of the procedures or
control operations they perform, and/or the necessary training or experience in their
respective functions; and failure to maintain complete and accurate records.
|
|
|
|
In-Vitro Diagnostic Test
Kits
Note: Jurisdiction of medical device review by the Center for Biologics Evaluation and
Research (CBER) and the Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) is governed by
the FDA Intercenter Agreement between CBER and CDRH (October 31, 1991).
CBER regulates medical devices related to licensed blood and cellular products by
applying appropriate medical device laws and regulations. The medical devices regulated by
CBER are intimately associated with the blood collection and processing procedures as well
as the cellular therapies regulated by CBER. CBER has developed specific expertise in
blood, blood products and cellular therapies and the integral association of certain
medical devices with those biological products supports the regulation of those devices by
CBER.
Warning Letter Issued to Medical Device Distributor
FDA Inspection Finds Firm Failed to Have Approval to Market IVDs
|
The FDA's Florida District Office issued a Warning Letter on July 9, 2001, to World
Diagnostics, Inc., Miami Lakes, Florida, a distributor of in-vitro diagnostic test kits.
An inspection at the firm located on 60th Avenue, Miami Lakes, in January/February 2001,
determined that the firm purchases and distributes the Smart Check TB, Smart Check Strep
Q, Smart Check Cotinine, Smart Check/Strip Opiates, Dengue IgM and IgG Double Spot, and
other in-vitro diagnostic test kits (IVDs). These IVDs are devices under the FD&C Act.
In addition, these IVDs are adulterated in that they are Class III devices and there are
no approved applications for premarket approval in effect and no approved applications for
investigational device exemptions.
The firm failed to conduct internal quality audits; failed to establish and maintain
procedures for receiving, reviewing and evaluating complaints by a formally designated
unit; and failed to establish and maintain an adequate organizational structure to ensure
that the devices are designed and produced in accordance with the Quality System
Regulation.
Firm Warned for Lacking MDR Reporting Procedures
The FDA's Chicago District Office issued a Warning Letter on June 11, 2001, to
TheraTest Laboratories, located in Chicago, Illinois. An inspection on February 12 - 14,
2001, determined that the firm manufactures in-vitro diagnostic devices. The inspection
disclosed violations of the Quality System Regulation for Medical Devices. The Warning
Letter cited the firm for the failure to control/monitor the production process and for an
absence of quality audit procedures, and design control procedures. The letter also cited
the firm for lacking Medical Device Reporting (MDR) procedures. |
|
|
|
Tissues
Warning Letter Issued to Tissue Eye Bank
Firm Fails to Quarantine Human Tissues Until Donor Screening is
Completed
|
On May 30, 2001, the FDA's Detroit District Office issued a Warning Letter to the
Indiana Lions Eye Bank, Inc., Indianapolis, Indiana. The FDA conducted an inspection of
the tissue bank from March 26, 2001, - April 3, 2001. During this inspection, the
investigator documented significant violations of the Public Health Service Act and 21
C.F.R. Part 1270. The Warning Letter cited the tissue bank for the following violations:
failure to follow written procedures for designating and identifying quarantined tissue;
failure to quarantine human tissues until donor screening has been completed for HIV,
Hepatitis B and Hepatitis C; failure to maintain accurate records which identify the
person performing the work, etc.; failure to have written procedures for all significant
steps in infectious testing; and failure to have written procedures for performing all
significant steps for obtaining, reviewing, and assessing the relevant medical records of
the donor readily available to personnel who may perform the procedures. |
|
|
|
Vaccines
Rabies Vaccine Recalled
Cracked Vials of Rabies Vaccine Result in Recall
|
In March 2001, the FDA's San Francisco District Office reported that Chiron Corp. of
Emeryville, California, was recalling certain lots of RabAvert brand Rabies Vaccine for
Human Use in 3cc glass vials because sterility may have been compromised as evidenced by
broken or cracked vials. Chiron Behring GmbH & Co., of Marburg, Germany, manufactured
the product. The firm received several consumer complaints of broken or cracked vials.
The problem was observed during preparation of vaccine and prior to patient injection
of vaccine. The firm initiated an internal investigation to determine the extent and the
root cause of the breakages. The firm indicated that for the 2 affected lots (261011 and
273011) some of the vials were packaged glass bottom to glass bottom. The firm's
investigation concluded that the glass to glass contact may have resulted in vial breakage
during shipment. The firm estimated they will recover 95 percent of the total product. The
FDA's San Francisco District Office monitored the recall to termination to assure proper
disposition of returned product.
Warning Letter and Recall for Hepatitis B Vaccine
Firm Warned For Returning Improperly Stored Vaccine to the
Market Place
|
United States v. Amscot Medical Labs, Inc., (S.D. Ohio) On August 2, 2001, the
United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio entered a Consent Decree of
Permanent Injunction prohibiting defendants, Amscot Medical Labs, Inc., and George
Kindness, M.D., Ph.D., from manufacturing, processing, packing, labeling, promoting, and
distributing a vaccine known as Theracine, any similar drug or any biologic product, or
any other drug that is a new drug. The government's Complaint for Permanent Injunction
alleged that defendants manufactured and distributed the Theracine vaccine for use in the
cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of cancer. The government further alleged that
defendants introduced into interstate commerce biological products for which a biologics
license application had not been approved, and that such products were adulterated in that
they were not manufacture d in compliance with CGMPs.
On September 6, 2001, the New England District Office issued a Warning Letter to the
President of Bindley Western Industries, Inc., Dublin, Ohio. The significant deviations
noted during the inspection and cited in the Warning Letter included the following:
returning to the marketplace drug products that had been subjected to improper storage
conditions; failure to assure that all prescription drugs were stored at appropriate
temperatures and under appropriate conditions; failure to assure that drug products were
held under conditions that are in conformance with storage requirements set for those
drugs; failure to consider the conditions under which a drug has been held, stored, or
shipped before or during its return; failure to establish, maintain, and to adhere to
written policies and procedures.
Consent Decree of Permanent Injunction Entered for Amscot Medical Labs
Firm Enjoined from Manufacturing and Distributing Unapproved
Drugs or Biological Products
|
United States v. Amscot Medical Labs, Inc., (S.D. Ohio) On August 2, 2001, the
United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio entered a Consent Decree of
Permanent Injunction prohibiting defendants, Amscot Medical Labs, Inc., and George
Kindness, M.D., Ph.D., from manufacturing, processing, packing, labeling, promoting, and
distributing a vaccine known as Theracine, any similar drug or any biologic product, or
any other drug that is a new drug. The government's Complaint for Permanent Injunction
alleged that defendants manufactured and distributed the Theracine vaccine for use in the
cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of cancer. The government further alleged that
defendants introduced into interstate commerce biological products for which a biologics
license application had not been approved, and that such products were adulterated in that
they were not manufacture d in compliance with CGMPs.
Under the Consent Decree, the defendants are prohibited from manufacturing and
distributing the Theracine vaccine, or any similar drug or biologic product, unless and
until they obtain appropriate premarket approval for such product and (1) hire a qualified
outside expert who certifies to FDA that defendant's facilities and methods of operation
are in conformity with CGMP; (2) submit a written report to FDA setting forth the actions
it has taken to ensure conformity with CGMP; (3) FDA representatives review and evaluate
the certification and report submitted and make inspections as deemed necessary; and (4)
defendant receives written authorization to resume manufacturing from the agency. The
Consent Decree also provides the government with the authority to require future shutdown
in the event of further violations, destruction of goods on hand, recall of distributed
articles, and inspectional costs.
Next Page
|
|