This report updates the Agencyís review performance on the FY 98 application submissions and evaluates its performance in reviewing FY 99 application submissions and meeting other PDUFA II goals. All but one of the FY 98 submissions have been reviewed and acted upon, and final performance relative to the goals can now be reported. Only a preliminary performance assessment on FY 99 submissions is possible at this time. For submission categories with a 10- or 12-month review goal, it is too early to measure review performance. For those submission categories with a review goal that is shorter than 10 months, performance on submissions received early in the fiscal year provides an early-indicator of final review performance. Unless otherwise noted, all performance data in this section are as of September 30, 1999.
This report continues the reporting conventions first described in the FY 1998 report:
Although many
of the Agencyís performance goals under PDUFA II are new and have no parallels
under PDUFA I, the goals relating directly to application review seek to
extend and improve on the gains made under PDUFA I. This report continues
to show both current performance and past performance relative to these
review goals. The report shows performance for the last five years.
CBER is in
the process of changing from counting PLAs and ELAs separately to combining
them as BLAs (Biologic License Applications). This report shows CBERís
workload and performance on PLAs and BLAs only (i.e., Product Applications).
To
simplify notation, it uses BLA as a generic term for both BLAs and PLAs.
Original and resubmitted ELAs have been dropped, both from workload counts
and performance measurements. These new counts are reflected in the workload
and performance data for the PDUFA I years, so trends into PDUFA II are
consistent.
In earlier
PDUFA Performance Reports, the "Workload" and "Performance" figures for
NDAs excluded original new product applications that fell under the PDUFA
definition of "human drug products" but which did not pay fees. Since these
applications are subject to the same performance goals as the fee-paying
applications, they are included in this report, both under "Workload" and
in the "Performance" figures. Workload figures from earlier years have
been adjusted to include these applications also.
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
| Priority |
6
months
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Standard |
12
months
10 months |
|
30 |
50 |
70 |
|
Workload -- Original submissions filed (Priority/Standard): |
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Performance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
| Class 1 |
6
months
4 months 2 months |
30 |
50 |
70 |
|
|
| Class 2 |
6
months
|
|
|
|
|
|
Workload-- Resubmissions received [Total (Class 1/Class 2)] |
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Performance
|
|
| Back to Contents | Next: Efficacy & Manufacturing Supplements |