| 2006P-0001 | Date of Approval for Lunesta (Eszopiclone) Tablets | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| FDA Comment Number : | EC5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Submitter : | Mr. Gregory Osment | Date & Time: | 02/02/2006 10:02:09 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Organization : | Mr. Gregory Osment | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Category : | Association | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Issue Areas/Comments | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| GENERAL | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| GENERAL | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The United States Department of Health and Human Services and the United States Patent and Trademark Office have no legal authority to approve a prescription drug patent, for what was mentioned as a synonym. A registered trademark is mandatory for each prescription drug, along with a patent.
There is no legal basis presented for doing the above, and no legal basis is available. No case law has been presented which supports this theory of approving a synonym as a prescription drug in a patent. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||