| 2006N-0292 | Unique Device Identification | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| FDA Comment Number : | EC9 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Submitter : | Mr. David Stiles, CBET | Date & Time: | 08/22/2006 09:08:36 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Organization : | Long Beach Memorial Medical Center | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Category : | Health Professional | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Issue Areas/Comments | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Developing a System of Unique Device Identifiers (UDI) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| How should a unique device identification system be developed? | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| May I suggust that you use a system in place, or develop the same identification system based on selected system. I would consider using the "Universal Medical Device Code" developed by ECRI. ECRI should also give the system to the FDA at no charge or allow you to use you groups (eg MedSun folks) to design your ID system. I would prefer to use an established standard blessed and approved by the FDA. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| What are the incentives for establishing a uniform, standardized | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Consistant reporting and identification based on excepted benchmarks and guidelines.
Standardized Computerized maintenancemanagement systems (CMMS). | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| What should be the role, if any, of FDA in the development and | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Because of the potencial of errors associated with misidentification, or HIPPA issues the FDA should have a major role in medical device RFID systems. There is no current standard on this system and we need FDA guidence on this issue. Perhaps look to AAMI. or IEEE for help. I really don't need the additional frequency and bandwidth issue to contend with on the various hybrid systems these manufacturers of RF devices are placing on medical centers. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||