| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
| 2006N-0292
|
| Unique Device Identification
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| FDA Comment Number :
|
| EC5
|
|
|
|
|
| Submitter :
|
| Mr. Kevin Ham
|
| Date & Time:
|
| 08/18/2006 03:08:49
|
|
|
|
|
| Organization :
|
| Directed Light
|
|
|
|
|
| Category :
|
| Device Industry
|
|
|
|
|
| Issue Areas/Comments
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Developing a System of Unique Device Identifiers (UDI)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| At what level of packaging (that is, unit of use) should UDIs be
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| see above
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Have you implemented some form of UDI in your product line?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| At my last job we implementated a UDI on a CHF class III device using laser marked silicone ID tags overmolded into the structure of the device. The information was only a serial number but this could be used for full traceability.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| How should a unique device identification system be developed?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Do what you are doing by reaching out to industry for answers. There are several technologies out there. See http://www.orbidcorp.com/ for an example.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Should unique device identifiers be considered for all devices?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| NO! Gloves were sited as an example in your article. Were you kidding? UDI's should only be required on implantable devices and/or those units that could cause death or serious injury if traceability would not otherwise be available.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| What are the barriers for establishing unique device
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Laser marking would be ideal for this application due to the ability to mark on a small sacle and avoid the use of inks which are often not durable enough for the human body. Unfortunately, these systems are a high cost item.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| What are the incentives for establishing a uniform, standardized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Desire for patient safety would have to offset the high process cost of machinery to enable UDI implementation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| What should be the role, if any, of FDA in the development and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| The FDA should develop the criteria defining what medical devices should have UDI's as well as exemption guidelines such as available footprint to mark (e.g: Class III larger than x.xx"). System may start out as voluntary and become mandatory at a later date?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| What solutions have you developed or could be developed for
|
|
|
|
|