| 2006D-0331 | Guidance for Institutional Review Boards, Clinical Investigators, and Sponsors; Exception from Informed Consent Requirements for Emergency Research | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| FDA Comment Number : | EC44 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Submitter : | Dr. Tom Aufderheide | Date & Time: | 10/25/2006 08:10:10 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Organization : | Dr. Tom Aufderheide | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Category : | Health Professional | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Issue Areas/Comments | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| GENERAL | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| GENERAL | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| I strongly support the exception to informed consent requirements as currently written. As a clinical researcher in this field with experience implementing three prior clinical trials using exception to informed consent under emergency circumstances, I believe 21 CFR 50.24 optimally balances the need to improve emergency care while protecting the rights of human subjects.
I also suggest consideration of a national IRB evaluating exception to informed consent protocols if it were implemented as an optional resource to the investigator. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||