| 2006D-0044 | Guidance for Industry on Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: Use in Medical Product Development to Support Labeling Claims | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| FDA Comment Number : | EC4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Submitter : | Mr. Allen Meyerhoff | Date & Time: | 04/07/2006 05:04:00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Organization : | Capitol Outcomes Research, Inc. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Category : | Health Professional | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Issue Areas/Comments | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| GENERAL | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| GENERAL | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| In the first paragraph of IV.D., the document indicates that measurement properties of an existing PRO instrument that has been revised with minor changes may be performed in a non-randomized study, but that more significant changes, such as use in a different patient population, may require a small, randomized study.
Being very familiar with use of PRO instruments and issues surrounding their psychometric properties, I am at an utter loss to understand what kind of research design would involve randomization in this context. I have seen many studies evaluating PRO instrument measurement properties, and they are either one-group cross-sectional, or better yet, one-group longitudinal designs. Accordingly, if one desires to assess psychometric properties of an existing instrument in a population different that the one the instrument was developed for, what instrument(s) would be randomized to what populations? Thank you. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||