| 2006D-0044 | Guidance for Industry on Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: Use in Medical Product Development to Support Labeling Claims | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| FDA Comment Number : | EC15 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Submitter : | Dr. Stephen McKenna | Date & Time: | 04/14/2006 12:04:48 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Organization : | Galen Research | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Category : | Other Organization | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Issue Areas/Comments | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| GENERAL | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| GENERAL | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Introduction
We are providing these comments from the perspective of disease-specific instrument developers with extensive experience in the field. 1. General Comments The guidance outlined by the FDA is broadly welcomed as a means of encouraging scientists to raise the standards of PRO outcomes research. The guidance quite rightly asserts that any PRO used as an endpoint in a clinical trial should meet certain quality standards and these are presented largely in terms of psychometric quality (specifically, reliability, validity and interpretability). However, there are a number of fundamental omissions in the quality standards presented; most notably in relation to the theoretical basis of instruments and the fundamental measurement properties of the instruments. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2006D-0044-EC15-Attach-1.DOC | ||||||||||||||||||||||||