|2005N-0279||Food Labeling; Gluten-Free Labeling of Foods; Public Meeting|
|FDA Comment Number :||EC442|
|Submitter :||Ms. Suzanne Bullock||Date & Time:||09/09/2005 06:09:52|
|Organization :||Ms. Suzanne Bullock|
|Category :||Individual Consumer|
| Dear FDA:
I am personally affected by the need for gluten-free foods, as are two of my children. The labeling of gluten-free foods is therefore of great importance to me. The purchase of these products, when specially manufactured, is extremely expensive already. The implementataion of a "zero- tolerance" standard would only serve to further increase these already exhorbitant prices, negatively impacting many families.
I encourage you to adopt a regulation on the use of "gluten-free" on product labels that is in line with that which has been used in Europe and other countries (including the USA via the Codex Alimentarius) for many years--20 PPM for products that contain naturally gluten-free ingredients, and 200 PPM for products that have been rendered gluten-free such as those that may contain Codex Alimentarius quality wheat starch. The formal adoption of these existing regulations will allow for the continued importation of excellent, safe European products that are labeled "gluten-free."
It is very important that you do not adopt a "zero tolerance" regulation in this matter because doing so will cause many gluten-free food companies to discontinue their use of the term "gluten-free" on their labels out of fear of litigation--which is counterproductive for all people with this disease (most, if not all, gluten-free food companies do not grow, transport or mill the gluten-free grains that they use as ingredients--a fact that will make them vulnerable to litigation if a zero tolerance level is adopted). Last, the inclusion of trace levels of gluten in the diets of those with celiac disease have been shown to be safe in many scientific studies, for more details please see:
Suzanne L. Bullock