| 2004D-0343 - Draft Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff; Hospital Bed System Dimensional Guidance to Reduce Entrapment; Availability|
|FDA Comment Number :||EC23|
|Submitter :||Mr. Larry LeForge||Date & Time:||12/10/2004 05:12:40|
|Organization :||Mary Free Bed Rehabilitation Hospital|
| Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the FDA draft guidance: Hospital Bed System Dimensional Guidance to Reduce Entrapment. I believe this draft guidance to be inappropriate to the scope of the issue. The numbers related to this issue indicate that there is 1 death per every 3.4 million admissions. Patients are more likely to die from an exploding microwave oven or terririst attact than from being entraped in a bed rail. I can see this guidance benefiting lawyers more than it will patients.
I understand and appreciate the intention of this document, to minimize the potential of patient entrapment in a hospital bed. But I feel that the introduction statement and Appendix F will focus attention on proactive testing of existing beds with little or no actual risk reduction. In fact, this focus will stretch currently scarce resources that would be better spent on patient assessment and modification of the bed environment if warranted based on patient size and/or condition.
As written, this guidance will create an expectation of hospitals and long term care facilities inspecting all of their existing (legacy) hospital beds for compliance with these dimensional limitations. My understanding is that pilot testing of existing beds has revealed that most if not all existing beds will not meet these dimensional limitations. So the extensive time and effort that will be required to determine that my 80 existing hospital beds will not pass is wasted with no risk reduction. The dimensional guidance has value to existing beds if it is clearly stated that the primary focus must first be clinical assessment of the patient physical condition to establish that they are vulnerable to the risk of bed entrapment. At that point, the focus of the clinical and support staff should be the assessment of the hospital bed system with a clear plan for addition or modification of that system to meet that specific patient's needs.
FDA must revise this draft document to clearly identify existing (legacy) beds are not inherently "unsafe" even though they do not meet the new dimensional limits established in this document. The focus on dimensional limits must be on new beds manufactured after the implementation of this document. The focus on legacy equipment should be patient assessment first, with risk mitigation efforts based on meeting that patient's need.
Larry P. LeForge, CHFM
Mary Free Bed Rehabilitation Hospital
235 Wealthy Street
Grand Rapids, MI 49503