| 2003N-0573 | Draft Animal Cloning Risk Assessment | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| FDA Comment Number : | EC967 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Submitter : | Mrs. Leona Fish | Date & Time: | 01/04/2007 11:01:11 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Organization : | Mrs. Leona Fish | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Category : | Food Industry | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Issue Areas/Comments | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| GENERAL | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| GENERAL | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| I want to all food that is from a cloned source to be CLEARLY and prominently labeled as such.
IF cloned food is (in your opinion safe) and harmless and IF you think the public doesn't care where their food originates (petri dish or the natural way) then it should be no problem to require labeling of the food source and allow the consumer to decide. What you determine today as harmless, may well turn out to be otherwise tomorrow! Cloning has NOT been around long enough to have any long term study data from which you are deciding the fate and health of the American consumers. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||