| 2003N-0573 | Draft Animal Cloning Risk Assessment | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| FDA Comment Number : | EC749 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Submitter : | Ms. d sarver | Date & Time: | 01/04/2007 10:01:53 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Organization : | Ms. d sarver | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Category : | Individual Consumer | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Issue Areas/Comments | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| GENERAL | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| GENERAL | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| You've made it extraordinarily difficult to find this. NO CLONED MEAT for me. I deserve a right to know. Meat should be labeled as packaged food is for country of origin and other nutritional elements. I don't think it should be cloned at all. My fallback position is that I, as a consumer, have a right to make educated choices in what I eat. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||