| 2003N-0573 | Draft Animal Cloning Risk Assessment | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| FDA Comment Number : | EC677 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Submitter : | Mr. Phil Dixon | Date & Time: | 01/04/2007 10:01:07 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Organization : | Mr. Phil Dixon | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Category : | Individual Consumer | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Issue Areas/Comments | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| GENERAL | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| GENERAL | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| If cloned meat is to be allowed I, as a consumer, would want to make sure it is labeled where I purchase it so I can differentiate between cloned and 'on the hoof' meat.
I see this as more important in the future because eventually the cost of cloning meat as opposed to raising it will differ. Consumers should be able to make the choice between the two. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||