| 2003N-0573 | Draft Animal Cloning Risk Assessment | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| FDA Comment Number : | EC455 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Submitter : | Mr. John W. Gilboux | Date & Time: | 01/03/2007 03:01:00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Organization : | N/A | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Category : | Individual Consumer | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Issue Areas/Comments | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| GENERAL | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| GENERAL | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| I vehemently oppose placing cloned meat products on the market without labeling them as "CLONED" or a similar desciptive label to alert people that the meat they are purchasing is cloned and not natural. The people should be aware of what they are eating. Why does the meat industry want their meat not to be labeled? Not labeling it is purely a marketing technique to have the public buy a product of unknown origin. Perhaps "Solyent Green" is near. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||