| 2003N-0573 | Draft Animal Cloning Risk Assessment | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| FDA Comment Number : | EC1105 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Submitter : | Ms. Tina Starewich | Date & Time: | 01/04/2007 12:01:11 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Organization : | Ms. Tina Starewich | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Category : | Individual Consumer | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Issue Areas/Comments | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| GENERAL | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| GENERAL | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (Actually, I'm a 'citizen'.)
How much must we citizens pay to support the economic hegemony of corporations? CLONING cattle? (Then regulating that, of course.) What's wrong? Are the cows sterile from pollutants or did they just lose interest in sex? Maybe the taxpayers should subsidize sexy lingerie for cows. Anything but making it cost effective for local producers to raise healthy cattle the natural way, right? That doesn't create enough profit for kickbacks and junkets, does it? Pttttht! | ||||||||||||||||||||||||