|2002N-0273||Animal Proteins Prohibited in Ruminant Feed|
|FDA Comment Number :||EC221|
|Submitter :||Ms. Tammie Crawford||Date & Time:||12/22/2005 03:12:36|
|Organization :||Carolina By Products|
|Category :||Animal Feed Industry|
Dec 14, 2005
Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305)
Food and Drug Administration
5630 Fishers Lane, Room 1061
Rockville, Maryland 20852.
Re: Docket No. 2002N-0273, Substances Prohibited From use in Animal Food or Feed
To Whom It May Concern:
This letter is in reference to FDA?s Docket No. 2002N-0273, the agency?s proposed rule and the invitation to comment on substances prohibited from use in animal food or feed.
We disagree with the conclusion that further action proposed in the rule is necessary, urge the FDA to seriously consider comments from the National Renderers Association (NRA) and the 2005 Rendering Industry Study by Informa Economics, and urge the agency to do in-depth economic and environmental impact studies based on current and representative data, before formalizing the proposed rule.
We continue to support scientifically based animal feeding regulations to restrict the use of certain animal proteins derived from mammalian tissues used in ruminant feeds. We agree that animal feed regulations need to be reviewed if new risks are identified or new, relevant science is brought to light. However, we agree with the NRA analysis of the facts and believe FDA?s preliminary conclusion to remove cattle brains and spinal cord and rendered dead animals from all animal feed is not warranted. We believe that this action aimed at removing a very minute risk from BSE will increase risks from other diseases, cause environmental degradation, and cost much more than can be justified.
The 1997 feed rule is working and compliance is extremely high. The USDA enhanced surveillance testing program found that only one indigenous cow tested positive for BSE out of more than 534,879 samples from high risk groups over the past 15 months, showing the incidence of BSE in the U.S. to be near zero. The National Cattleman?s Beef Association estimates an infection rate in the U.S. of one in more than 18 million cattle over 30 months of age?for all practical purposes it is statistically zero.
Applying the same rules as recommended in Europe is nonsense. The incidence in the U.S. is at least 500 fold lower than in the EU. The U.S. instituted preventive measures long before Europe, and the early action assured the infection was never established here. It is also worth noting that the rendering industry in Europe is heavily subsidized so that prohibited materials are picked up and processed avoiding a massive disposal problem.
We agree with NRA?s statement that the feasibility of removing brains and spinal cords from dead stock is very low with the exception of near perfect weather conditions,overall climate,distance between production and rendering locations, age, size, and condition of cattle, worker skill, and equipment and technology. Renderers will be forced to charge higher collection fees to cover the increased costs of material disposal, processing, and lost product revenues or end the practice of collecting dead cattle altogether. The magnitude of the disposal problem the proposed rule would cause is much larger than FDA estimates.
FDA describes the primary benefit of the proposed rule as ?elimination of the vast majority of the risk of spreading BSE to other cattle from intentional or unintentional use of non-ruminant feed for ruminants or cross-contamination of ruminant feed with non-ruminant feed or ingredients intended for non-ruminant feed.? The risks eliminated by the proposal are likely much smaller than the future risks of burying carcasses and disease agents on the farm at best, and more inappropriate methods at worse.
Respectfully Submitted By: Tammie Crawford