| 2003D-0391 - Draft guidances for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff; Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Dental Noble Metal Alloys and Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Dental Base Metal Alloys; Availability | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| FDA Comment Number : | EC1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Submitter : | Mr. William Argentino | Date & Time: | 11/16/2004 06:11:24 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Organization : | RPh | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Category : | Health Professional | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Issue Areas/Comments | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| GENERAL | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| GENERAL | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| I attended a 4 day pharmacy senimar last week and control of schedule II drugs was talked about. In particular tamper proof Rx forms that can't be changed. My question is: Has placing schedule II drugs in alphabetical order with all other drugs cut down on pharmacy theft since the thief must look through the entire stock to find a schedule II. Many pharmacy robbers know exactly what they are looking for so it seems a strong safe for sched.IIs would be better. | |||||||||||||||||||||||