From: Steve Raymond [sraymond@phtcorp.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2004 3:40 PM To: 'FDAdockets@oc.fda.gov' Cc: Richard LaFleur; Gerry Meyer Subject: Comment for FDA Docket Number 2004N0133 > Comment for FDA Docket Number 2004N0133 concerning potential changes to > Part 11. > > Section 11.300 concerning controls for identification codes/passwords > requires "Ensuring that identification code and password issuances are > periodically checked, recalled, or revised... > > In our experience in clinical trials the most common method of addressing > this requirement is to compel periodic changing of passwords This > practice conforms to the FDA Guidance "Computerized Systems Used in > Clinical Trials" section V. A. 4. statement: "Passwords ... should be > changed at established intervals." While changing a password seems to be > a reasonable way to address the possibility over time that a password > could become compromised, in practice we have observed that the task of > remembering multiple changing passwords, as might be required of a study > coordinator conducting several eClinical trials, is difficult. Users of > electronic systems in our opinion regularly resort to writing down their > passwords or to reliance on a simple and predictable scheme for adapting > passwords at each forced change. Such schemes would not offer much of an > impediment to guessing a present password were a past password to be > learned by an interloper. Furthermore, we believe users at a site who > trust each other frequently share passwords in order to share workloads. > Obviously such practices run counter to the intent of Section 11.300 to > ensure the security and integrity of electronic signatures based upon > identification codes in combination with passwords > > We believe that FDA should consider a clarification of 11.300(b) > specifically to mention the option of continuous use of a password > (Forever Password) that is periodically "checked" for integrity, but not > changed. Such "checks" could include presenting a comprehensive listing > of actions on electronic records performed under the password and/or a > "last login" listing to the password holder each time they use the system. > In the way that a credit card company uses transaction summaries so that > card holders can review charges prior to payment, such a process for > checking integrity has precedence for inspiring confidence and > "non-repudiation". The chief benefit is that when a user knows his or her > particular password can last "forever" if it is NOT compromised, he or she > will identify with it (like a signature) and will invest in thinking up a > good password. We believe also that users will work to keep such a valued > password from being disclosed even to trusted colleagues in order to avoid > the work of changing it. While we believe in the security of a Forever > Password, it may be that periodic recall is working in some instances as > well. We believe FDA should clarify that either approach, properly > executed, is acceptable. > > Stephen A. Raymond, PhD > Chief Scientific Officer and Founder > Richard LaFleur Director of Quality Compliance Gerald F. Meyer Regulatory Consultant (Former Acting Director CDER) > PHT Corporation > 500 Rutherford Ave. > Charlestown, MA 02129 > 617 973 1610 (Voice) 617 549 1229 (Mobile) > 617 973 1611 (FAX) > sraymond@phtcorp.com