From: EWFeucht@cs.com Sent: Monday, March 26, 2001 7:43 AM To: fdadockets@oc.fda.gov Subject: Docket 00N-1396 & Docket 00D-1598 Docket 00N-1396 & Docket 00D-1598 Dockets Management Branch (HFA-305) Food and Drug Administration 5630 Fishers Lane, Room 1061 Rockville, MD 20852 Dear Sirs or Madam, I strongly believe based on the scientific research currently available on the subject that your rules regarding approval, labeling and marketing of genetically engineered foods and products are severely insufficient to protect the American public and environment. You MUST consider the following points: * The FDA must require mandatory pre-market comprehensive environmental review. Unlike conventional pollutants, where a given amount of pollutant causes a limited amount of damage, a small number of mutant genes could have a population explosion and reproduce forever, causing unlimited and irreparable damage. * The FDA must require mandatory pre-market long-term health testing. GE products could be toxic, cause allergic responses, have lower nutritional value, and compromise immune responses in consumers. * The FDA must require mandatory labeling of GE products. Without mandatory labeling, neither consumers nor health professionals will know if an allergic or toxic reaction was the result of a genetically engineered food. Consumers would be deprived of the critical knowledge needed to hold food producers liable should any of these novel products be hazardous. * The FDA must end its cozy relationship with the industries it purports to be regulating. People have been allowed to work for a biotech company, then work for the FDA writing the regulatory rules on that company's product, then go back to working for the company. Ninety-two percent of FDA advisory committee meetings had at least one conflict of interest. Failure to control this growing threat could result in the poisoning of the earth's gene pool, weakening of the ecosystem and worldwide boycotts of US produce. Have some sense! Erick Feucht Sandy Hook, CT