From: mcharlot [mcharlot@mindspring.com] Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2001 1:12 PM To: fdadockets@oc.fda.gov Subject: "Docket 00N-1396 & Docket 00D-1598" Dear Sir/Madam: The people I know, family, friends and neighbors, are of the opinion that: YOU, * The FDA must require mandatory pre-market comprehensive environmental review. Unlike conventional pollutants, where a given amount of pollutant causes a limited amount of damage, a small number of mutant genes could have a population explosion and reproduce forever, causing unlimited and irreparable damage. YOU, * The FDA must require mandatory pre-market long-term health testing. GE products could be toxic, cause allergic responses, have lower nutritional value, and compromise immune responses in consumers. YOU, * The FDA must require mandatory labeling of GE products. Without mandatory labeling, neither consumers nor health professionals will know if an allergic or toxic reaction was the result of a genetically engineered food. Consumers would be deprived of the critical knowledge needed to hold food producers liable should any of these novel products be hazardous. YOU, * The FDA must end its cozy relationship with the industries it purports to be regulating. People have been allowed to work for a biotech company, then work for the FDA writing the regulatory rules on that company's product, then go back to working for the company. Ninety-two percent of FDA advisory committee meetings had at least one conflict of interest. Your Agency is responsible for supporting and maintaining the Public Health and implementing laws safeguarding the wellbeing and the informed food choices of the American People. The American People are better informed than you would think, and we insist that you act according to the purpose for which you are paid by the People (Government through our taxes), and for which this Agency was created in the first place. Sincerely, Charlotte Nakosteen Santa Barbara California ******************* Charlotte Nakosteen mcharlot@sb.net