From: Sylvia Valentine [sylviavalentine@hotmail.com] Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2001 12:40 PM To: fdadockets@oc.fda.gov Subject: Docket 00N-1396 & Docket 00D-1598 Dear Commissioner, The proposed rules: * Do not require mandatory pre-market safety testing * Do not require pre-market environmental review * Do not require mandatory labeling of GE foods * Restrict voluntary labeling of non-GE foods * Require a mere letter of notification prior to the   marketing of a GE food * Fail to ensure public access to adequate information   for independent review * Are supported by industry and opposed by consumer groups Please see my views below! * The FDA must require mandatory pre-market comprehensive   environmental review. Unlike conventional pollutants,   where a given amount of pollutant causes a limited amount   of damage, a small number of mutant genes could have a   population explosion and reproduce forever, causing   unlimited and irreparable damage. * The FDA must require mandatory pre-market long-term health   testing. GE products could be toxic, cause allergic   responses, have lower nutritional value, and compromise   immune responses in consumers. * The FDA must require mandatory labeling of GE products.   Without mandatory labeling, neither consumers nor health   professionals will know if an allergic or toxic reaction   was the result of a genetically engineered food. Consumers   would be deprived of the critical knowledge needed to hold   food producers liable should any of these novel products   be hazardous. * The FDA must end its cozy relationship with the industries   it purports to be regulating. People have been allowed to   work for a biotech company, then work for the FDA writing the   regulatory rules on that company's product, then go back to   working for the company.  Ninety-two percent of FDA advisory   committee meetings had at least one conflict of interest. _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com