From: panacea_mm@yahoo.com
Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2001 2:01 PM
To: fdadockets@oc.fda.gov
Cc: panacea_mm@yahoo.com
Subject: Oppose FDA's New Regulations on Genetically Engineered Food

Michael Marsolek
6802 N. Wolcott, 3B
Chicago, IL  60626

panacea_mm@yahoo.com


RE: Docket No. 00N-1396, and 00D-1598

Dear FDA,
 
I am outraged by your new policies on genetically engineered (GE) foods. Despite overwhelming consumer demand, your agency still fails to require safety testing and mandatory labeling for GE foods. Your "notification" policy is an insult to consumers, and irresponsibly ignores strong scientific evidence of numerous potential health and environmental risks to GE foods. You should be aware that these foods could be toxic, could cause allergic responses, could have lower nutrition value, could compromise immune responses in consumers, and could cause irreparable damage to the environment. 

I am also greatly opposed to your new "voluntary labeling" policy, which denies consumers a basic right to know. Without mandatory labeling, neither consumers nor health professionals will know if an allergic or toxic reaction was the result of a genetically engineered food. Consumers will also be deprived of the critical knowledge they need to hold food producers liable should any of these novel foods prove hazardous.  I understand that the corporations are worried that placing GE stickers on foods will have the same effect as putting a poison sticker on food, they are worried people will be paranoid without having the information.  However, this is a democracy, and if I want to be paranoid I have that right, and your agency does not have the right to deny me that.  Your stance is completely anathema to the foundation of this country.

Your proposed rules ignore serious concerns, and appear to be a decision made to convenience industry at the expense of public health and the environment. I will not accept your attempt to make me a guinea pig of these untested foods, and I trust you will take my concern along with the thousands of others into serious consideration.

Sincerely,



Michael Marsolek