Notes
Slide Show
Outline
1
Raltegravir
NDA 22-145
  • Sarah M. Connelly, MD
  • Division of Antiviral Products
  • Advisory Committee Meeting
  • September 5, 2007
2
Raltegravir: Overview

  • Efficacy review


  • Resistance data


  • Safety review


  • Conclusions
3
Efficacy Review
4
Efficacy: Overview
  • Trial design: treatment-experienced
    • Pivotal Phase 3 : Protocols 018 and 019
    • Phase 2 dose finding: Protocol 005

  • Demographics and Baseline Characteristics


  • Week 16 and 24 analyses


  • Subgroup analyses
    • PSS
    • Number of protease inhibitors in OBT
    • Enfuvirtide, darunavir use

5
Efficacy: Phase 3 Trial Design
Protocols 018 and 019
  • Raltegravir 400 mg bid + OBT vs   Placebo + OBT


  • Identical design at different geographic locations


  • Inclusion criteria:
    • Treatment-experienced
    • HIV-1 RNA>1,000 copies/mL
    • Resistant to > 1 drug from each: NNRTI, NRTI, PIs


  • 2:1 randomization


  • Primary Efficacy Endpoint:
    • Week 16 % subjects with HIV-1 RNA < 400 copies/mL


  • Virologic failure > Week 16 could enter open-label
6
Efficacy: Phase 2 Dose Finding
Protocol 005
  • Treatment-experienced


  • 200, 400, 600 mg raltegravir bid versus placebo
    • Each in combination w/ OBT
  • Subject inclusion criteria:
    • HIV-1 RNA > 5,000 copies/mL
    • CD4 > 50 cells/mm3
    • Resistant to > 1 drug from each: NNRTI, NRTI, PIs


  • Duration:  At least 24 weeks double-blind


7
Efficacy: Demographics
8
Efficacy: Baseline Characteristics
9
Efficacy: Baseline Characteristics
10
Efficacy: Week 16 Analysis
11
Efficacy: Week 24 Analysis*
12
Efficacy: Subgroup Analyses
HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL at Week 16
13
Efficacy: Subgroup Analyses
HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL at Week 16
14
Efficacy: Summary
  • Raltegravir + OBT displays significantly greater antiviral activity as compared to OBT alone in treatment-experienced subjects
    • Week 16 HIV-1 RNA <400 copies/mL


  • Supported by
    • Week 16 HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL
    • Δ CD4 from baseline
    • Week 24 data
    • Subgroup analyses
15
Resistance Data
16
Microbiology Resistance Data
Protocols 005, 018 and 019
  • Paired sequence analysis of baseline and on-treatment samples from 77 subjects with evidence of virologic failure
    • 75/77 (97%) genotypic mutations in the HIV-1 integrase coding region


  • 3 key mutations, Y143C/H/R, Q148H/K/R, or N155H
    • Observed in 65/75 subjects (87%)
    • Detected as early as Day 27
    • ↓ susceptibility in cell culture to raltegravir
      • Q148 H/K/R 24 to 46-fold
      • N155H 13-fold


17
Microbiology Resistance Data
  • Each of 3 key mutations usually accompanied by > 1 additional mutation:
    • L74M/R, E92Q, T97A, E138A/K, G140A/S, V151I, G163R, H183P, Y226C/D/F/H, S230N/R, and D232N


    • G140A/S/Q148H/K/R double mutation most frequent (35%, 27/77)
      • ↑resistance 257 to 521-fold

    • E92Q /N155H double mutation (9%, 7/77)
      • ↑resistance 64-fold
18
Safety Review
19
Safety Overview

  • Mortality


  • Discontinuations due to Adverse Events (AEs)


  • Serious AEs


  • Common AEs


  • Select AEs
    • Malignancy
    • AIDS defining conditions
    • Rash
    • Hepatic events


    • Creatine kinase
    • Renal events
    • Subgroups:
      • OBT (+)atazanavir
      • HBV/HCV co-infection

20
Mortality
  • 16 deaths through Safety Update Report data
    • 12 during double-blind (DB) phase
    • 1 death due to conditions present at screening
    • 1 death “post-study”; last raltegravir dose not confirmed
  • No deaths in treatment-naïves
21
Mortality


22
Mortality
  •        Analysis of Baseline Characteristics











  • Subjects who died were more advanced at baseline


23
Mortality: Similar to Salvage Trials
24
Mortality: Summary

  • Mortality rates and causes of death appear similar to those observed in other clinical trials enrolling similar subject populations


  • All deaths considered unrelated to study therapy by investigators


  • Our review of the cases supports investigator assessment


25
Study Discontinuations
26
Study Discontinuations Associated with AEs
27
Serious Adverse Events (SAE)

  • 20.7% raltegravir vs 22.5% control
    • Pneumonia most common (1.2% and 1.3%, respectively)


  • Review of investigator assessed drug-related SAEs
    • 16 drug-related SAEs in 13 subjects
    • Raltegravir N=8 (1.1 %, 8/755)
    • Gastritis, Renal failure (2), Hepatitis complicated by IRS and treatment for thyrotoxicosis, Herpes simplex, Hypersensitivity


  • 14 subjects discontinued due to SAE (1.3%)


28
Common Adverse Events: Treatment-Experienced
  • 438 raltegravir and 247 placebo subjects with > 1 AE


  • Majority mild to moderate in intensity


  • Most common AEs occurring in  > 10%, observed with similar frequency in each study arm :
    • Diarrhea
    • Injection site reactions (due to enfuvirtide use)
    • Nausea
    • Headache


29
Common AEs
  • Clinical AEs reported more frequently
  • (≥ 2% difference) in raltegravir-treated subjects


30
Focused Analyses of AEs of Interest
  • Malignancy
  • AIDS Defining Conditions
  • Rash
  • Hepatic Events
  • Creatine Kinase
  • Renal events
  • Concomitant atazanavir
  • HBV/HCV Co-infection
31
Malignancy
  • 21 malignancies in 20 subjects through SUR







  • No malignancies observed in placebo-treated subjects at time of SUR
32
Malignancy - July Update
  • 36 malignancies in 31 subjects














33
Malignancy: Types
  •       Raltegravir-treated subjects
    • Squamous cell ca: anogenital N=7
      • Anal (N=3)
      • Carcinoma in situ (N=4)
    • Squamous cell carcinoma: skin N=6
    • Kaposi’s sarcoma N=5
    • Lymphoma N=4
    • Basal cell carcinoma N=3
    • Hodgkin’s disease N=2
    • Rectal cancer N=1
    • Hepatocellular carcinoma N=1
    • Squamous cell carcinoma: other N=1

  •        Onset 25 – 557 days







  •      Control subjects
    • Squamous cell carcinoma: anogenital N=2
      • Anal (N=2)
    • Lymphoma N=1
    • Basal cell carcinoma N=1
    • Squamous cell carcinoma: other N=1
    • Metastatic neoplasm N=1






  •       Onset >200 days
34
Malignancy: July Update
Phase 2 and 3: Double Blind Phase
35
Malignancy: July Update
Treatment-Experienced Protocols
36
Malignancy: Summary
  • Identified malignancies expected in this heavily-treatment experienced population


  • No clear pattern to types of malignancies observed


  • Initial imbalance diminished with longer follow up



37
AIDS Defining Conditions (ADCs)
  • Determined by blinded external adjudicator in Phase 3 studies
  • 32 subjects with 40 ADCs
    • 15 presumptive, 25 definitive
    • Majority during double-blind treatment period (N=34)


38
Rash Events: Phase 1
  • 17/334 (5.1%) reported rash


  • Mild intensity


  • Discontinuations for rash only occurred in setting of DRV/r co-administration


    • Raltegravir - DRV/r interaction study
    • 2 period study: raltegravir alone → raltegravir + DRV/r
    • Healthy adults
    • 4 discontinuations due to rash, one SAE
      • All taking raltegravir + DRV/r for ≥ 9 days at rash onset

39
Rash Events: Phase 2 and 3

  • 71 subjects with 73 rash events, double-blind period





  • No study discontinuations due to rash
    • 4 subjects interrupted study therapy (3 raltegravir,1 placebo), all resumed


  • Raltegravir-treated subjects:
    • Median (mean) onset 45 days (78 days)
    • Median (mean) resolution 20 days (41 days)

40
Rash Events: Phase 2 and 3
  • 1 “severe” rash in raltegravir-treated subject
    • OBT: abacavir, EFV, 3TC
    • Rash resolved w/o drug interruption


  • 27 rashes assessed as drug-related:
    • 2.4% (N=17) raltegravir vs 3.1% (N=10) control
    • 3 in raltegravir arm resolved with discontinuation of OBT component (abacavir, fosamprenavir, ENF)

  • Open-Label
    • 1 rash 16 days after starting raltegravir with unchanged OBT
    • Rash resolved w/o drug interruption





41
Hypersensitivity
  • 14 hypersensitivity events in 10 subjects, double-blind period







  • 2 SAEs: both in raltegravir-treated subjects
    • Resolution after discontinuation of darunavir; resumed raltegravir
    • Multiple hypersensitivity episodes and treatment interruptions with discontinuation of darunavir, ENF, and TMP/SMX; back on raltegravir as of Day 180
42
Rash AEs: Summary
  • Majority of rash events in raltegravir-treated subjects were mild to moderate in intensity


  • No rash event resulted in study discontinuation in the Phase 2 and 3 development program


  • Clear pattern of rash has not been established and most are self-limited


  • Many of the rash events confounded by use of concomitant medications associated with rash:
    • Darunavir, abacavir
    • All reported rashes in drug-drug interaction Protocol 029, for example, occurred after darunavir was added to raltegravir


43
Hepatic Events: Phase 2 and 3

  • No dose-response relationship observed
  • 5 SAEs
    • Raltegravir (N=4)
      • Hepatocellular carcinoma
      • Portal HTN/varices
      • Hepatitis in setting of IRS and treatment for thyrotoxicosis
      • Pneumonia w/ elevated hepatic enzymes on DRV/r
    • Placebo (N=1)
      • Hepatitis due to TPV/r








44
Hepatic Events: Lab Data
45
Hy’s Law
46
Screening for Hy’s Law Cases
  • Definition for potential Hy’s Law cases
    • AST and/or ALT > 3x ULN
    • Total bilirubin > 2x ULN
    • No evidence of obstruction (~normal Alk phos)
    • No evidence of another cause


  • Phase 2 and 3 SUR datasets examined
    • 6 subjects meeting initial laboratory screening criteria
47
Evaluation of Hy’s Law: No Cases
  • 1. Protocol 005 200 mg raltegravir Double Blind Continued study therapy
  • OBT: Atazanavir/r, ddI, 3TC
  • Hx ↑bilirubin, transaminases 2003; splenomegaly, steatosis 2000


  • 2. Protocol 005 200 mg raltegravir OLPVF Continued study therapy
  • OBT: Atazanavir, LPV/r, abacavir, 3TC
  • Hx hyperbilirubinemia 2004


  • 3. Protocol 018 400 mg raltegravir Double Blind Continued study therapy
  • OBT: DRV/r, abacavir, TDF
  • (+)HCV -> transient reactivation


  • 4. Protocol 018 400 mg raltegravir Double Blind, Post-Tx Interrupted Day 32 - 66
  • OBT: DRV/r, indinavir, 3TC, AZT
  • (+)Grade 2 Alkaline Phosphatase
  • Occurred in setting of acute thyrotoxicosis tx with PTU (Day 36); bronchopneumonia (Day 102)
  • 5. Protocol 019 400 mg raltegravir Double Blind Interrupted Day 168 - 174
  • OBT: DRV/r, TDF + FTC (*discontinuation on Day 33)
  • (+)HBV ->reactivation with HBV DNA 84,000,000 IU/mL


  • 6. Protocol 019 400 mg raltegravir Double Blind Continued study therapy
  • OBT: Atazanavir, DRV/r, TDF + FTC
  • (+)HBV, baseline bilirubin 3.4




48
Creatine Kinase (CK)
  • 63 subjects experienced Grade 2 - Grade 4 CK elevations


49
CK AEs

  • Elevations were transient and resolved without drug interruption


  • No SAEs or study discontinuations were associated with elevated CK levels


  • No apparent association with concomitant use of lipid-lowering agents/PIs and increased CK


50
Renal AEs: Phase 2 and 3
  • 22 Renal AEs occurred in 18 subjects















51
Renal SAEs
  • 9 Renal SAEs, all double-blind period


  • Calculi, nephrolithiasis 1 raltegravir, 1 placebo
    • Raltegravir (+)hx kidney stones
    • Placebo (+)indinavir


  • Nephrotic syndrome 1 raltegravir
  • Focal glomerulosclerosis
    • (+)HCV, HTN, Proteinuria


  • Renal failure 3 raltegravir, 2 placebo
    • Raltegravir:
      • 1 (+)HBV/HCV, hx renal insufficiency, (+) tenofovir - discontinued
      • 1 (+)HTN, DM, tenofovir.  Occurred in setting of clinical dx c. difficile, CHF
      • 1 (+)tenofovir.  Death attributed to suspected sepsis.
  • Nephropathy 1 raltegravir
    • (+)tenofovir – discontinued
52
AEs in Subjects with OBT (+)Atazanavir
  • 116 subjects received atazanavir
    • 78 raltegravir, 38 placebo
  • AEs >5% raltegravir-treated subjects on atazanavir


53
HBV/HCV Co-Infected Subjects
  • No study discontinuations due to ↑AST/ALT or bilirubin


54
AEs associated with higher (top 10%) raltegravir plasma concentration
  • Selected AEs within +/- 2 days of higher raltegravir level
  • No SAEs, no study discontinuations
  • No temporal correlation between AEs and higher raltegravir plasma concentration
55
Conclusion
56
Conclusion of Raltegravir Review
  • Robust antiviral activity with no safety signals identified


  • Relatively few subjects discontinued due to AEs


  • Malignancy: Initial imbalance diminished with longer follow up


  • Safety database limited by small population, short follow up
    • Longer term (48+ weeks) follow up with smaller Phase 2 studies

57