|
|
|
Blood Products Advisory Committee |
|
March 10, 2006 |
|
Elliot P. Cowan, Ph.D. |
|
Chief, Product Review Branch |
|
Division of Emerging and Transfusion Transmitted
Diseases |
|
FDA/CBER/OBRR |
|
|
|
|
|
FDA sought advice from BPAC regarding the
conditions necessary to support approval of a home-use HIV test kit. |
|
In particular, we asked the Committee to
consider what studies are needed to validate |
|
test accuracy |
|
test interpretation and |
|
medical follow-up |
|
based on the provision of informational
material in place of a trained test operator and counselor. |
|
|
|
|
Proposal by OraSure Technologies |
|
Discussion of changes in HIV testing practices
and counseling recommendations |
|
Role of quality systems for diagnostic tests |
|
Psychological and social issues associated with
HIV testing and OTC home-use tests |
|
Overview of OTC review process at FDA |
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits |
|
Anonymous testing potentially leads to more
people knowing their HIV status |
|
Earlier diagnosis and therefore earlier
intervention |
|
Empowerment of consumers in healthcare decisions |
|
Potential impact on behavior and public health |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risks |
|
Incorrect test results due to improper
performance of the test or incorrect test interpretation has the potential
for significant risk of harm to patients and public health |
|
Inappropriate use of test or test result |
|
Misinterpretation (relying on test to provide
accurate result after a very recent exposure) |
|
Potential adverse outcomes after obtaining a
test result without live counseling |
|
Inability to reach individuals for follow-up and
to perform partner notification |
|
Coercive testing |
|
Testing by minors |
|
|
|
|
|
A home-use HIV test kit should be no less
accurate than tests approved for use under CLIA waiver |
|
Home-use HIV test kits should have high
analytical sensitivity and specificity |
|
FDA could be flexible on performance levels in
the intended use population |
|
If requirements for performance are
unattainable, then the availability of a home use test kit would be
jeopardized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinical trial could be performed in two phases
(observed and unobserved) |
|
The clinical trial should look not only at
performance of test, but also at the effectiveness of the instructions for
use |
|
Critical for users to understand limitations of
test, especially concerning window period |
|
Linkage to counseling and medical follow-up is
critical |
|
|
|
|
|
FDA seeks the advice of the Committee on
proposed studies that would be needed to validate a home-use HIV test kit
with regard to |
|
test
accuracy |
|
test
interpretation |
|
medical
follow-up |
|
based on the provision of informational material
in place of a trained test operator and counselor. |
|
|
|
|
Studies to identify potential users of the test |
|
Phase I studies |
|
Phase II studies |
|
Phase III studies |
|
Additional recommendations on informational
materials, counseling, testing, and referral |
|
|
|
|
Potential users of the test should be identified
by means of qualitative research |
|
Clinical trial study populations should reflect
the demographics of those users identified in these studies |
|
|
|
|
|
Objectives |
|
To establish the inherent sensitivity and
specificity of the test |
|
To demonstrate that the test is capable of
withstanding operational stress |
|
Performed by individuals trained in the use of
the test |
|
|
|
|
Studies similar to those required for HIV tests
for professional use |
|
Expected results: comparable to approved professional use tests |
|
Additional analytical studies not necessary for
previously FDA approved test |
|
|
|
|
Conduct thorough hazard analysis |
|
Evaluate ability of test to withstand potential
sources of error |
|
Device should be designed with procedural
control that is sensitive to all applicable system errors |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Objective:
To evaluate in a controlled setting |
|
Effectiveness and safety of sample collection by
untrained potential users |
|
Ability of untrained potential users to perform
test properly |
|
Ability of untrained potential users to read and
interpret test results |
|
Performance of test in hands of untrained
potential users |
|
Reactions to test results by untrained potential
users |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Observational studies |
|
Untrained users perform test by themselves while
being observed by individuals trained in the use of the test |
|
Actual testing setting should be simulated as
closely as possible, physically separating the trained tester from the test
subject |
|
|
|
|
Monitor the ability of study participants to
properly collect a test specimen |
|
Note any deviations from the procedure described
in the test kit, along with impact on the test result |
|
|
|
|
Monitor study participants for their ability to
follow the instructional materials on the running of the test after the
specimen is collected |
|
Note any deviation from the instructional
materials |
|
|
|
|
Interpretation of self-testing |
|
Interpretation of testing of weak reactive and
negative specimens |
|
Interpretation of examples of test results |
|
|
|
|
|
Interpretation of self-testing |
|
Ability to correctly interpret own test results
and identify any follow-up actions that should be taken consistent with the
informational materials provided with test kit |
|
Compare results of testing by untrained
potential users to results of testing by trained personnel using
appropriate statistical methods |
|
|
|
|
|
Interpretation of testing of weak reactive and
negative specimens |
|
120 aliquots of weak reactive and 120 aliquots
of negative specimen, evaluated by 240 study participants |
|
Expected performance is a point estimate of at
least 95% for the weak reactive specimen and 99% for the negative specimen |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interpretation of examples of test results |
|
Study participants, whose HIV status was not
known prior to testing, will be evaluated for their ability to correctly
interpret a set of test results (non-reactive, strongly reactive, weakly
reactive, invalid) |
|
Expected lower bound of 95% CI for % agreement |
|
>98% for non-reactive, strongly reactive, and
invalid |
|
95% for weakly reactive |
|
|
|
|
The number of untrained users participating in
these studies should be sufficient to demonstrate that the lower bound of
the two-sided 95% confidence interval is at least 95% for both sensitivity
and specificity |
|
At least three geographically diverse clinical
trial sites with a high prevalence of HIV infection |
|
Known HIV-positive individuals may be included
in this part of the clinical trial, but we propose that at least 10
HIV-positive individuals will be identified from testing by/of the
untrained potential users who are unaware of their HIV status |
|
|
|
|
|
Objective:
Validation of adequacy of informational materials to: |
|
Inform the study participant about the
limitations of the test |
|
Inform the study participant about the need to
confirm a reactive test result |
|
Inform the study participant about the
availability of resources for counseling and medical follow-up |
|
Have the study participant properly dispose of
test-related waste |
|
|
|
|
|
Monitor untrained potential users of the test
for their reactions following interpretation of the test result |
|
E.g., interview, questionnaire |
|
Assess likelihood of appropriate follow-up by
study participant |
|
Use cognitive evaluation to assess responses |
|
Note adverse reactions and take appropriate
action |
|
|
|
|
Phase II will include reference testing by
trained users |
|
Collect follow-up specimen from individuals with
reactive test results for confirmatory testing |
|
Informed consent should indicate that study
participant may or may not be observed |
|
|
|
|
|
Objective: |
|
To evaluate the home-use HIV test kit in an
unobserved and uncontrolled (intended use) setting |
|
Multiple options for the conduct of Phase III
studies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Objectives: |
|
Evaluate test performance of the test
(sensitivity and specificity) in the hands of untrained potential users |
|
Evaluate reactions of study participants to
their test results |
|
Validate ability of informational materials to: |
|
Communicate the proper use of the test |
|
Communicate test limitations |
|
Have study participant seek follow-up testing
and referral to care |
|
Effectively provide a route to counseling |
|
Validate the counseling system |
|
|
|
|
The number of untrained users participating in
these studies should be sufficient to demonstrate that the lower bound of
the two-sided 95% confidence interval is at least 95% for both sensitivity
and specificity |
|
At least three geographically diverse clinical
trial sites with a high prevalence of HIV infection |
|
Known HIV-positive individuals may be included
in this part of the clinical trial, but propose that at least 10
HIV-positive individuals will be identified from testing by/of the
untrained potential users who are unaware of their HIV status |
|
|
|
|
|
Limited to evaluating the ability of the
informational materials to communicate |
|
Proper use of the test |
|
Test limitations |
|
Have the test subject seek follow-up testing and
referral to care |
|
Effectively provide a route to counseling |
|
Validate the counseling system |
|
Sensitivity and specificity would be determined
from the Phase II studies |
|
Assumes that test performance derived from Phase
II studies reflects test performance in potential use settings |
|
|
|
|
Phase III studies not necessary |
|
Assumes that Phase II studies will be sufficient
to establish test performance in potential use settings and validate
effectiveness of the informational materials |
|
|
|
|
Labeling to clearly communicate need to read
informational materials prior to conducting test |
|
The informational materials should be easy to
comprehend by potential users of test |
|
Informational materials must clearly communicate
expected performance of test kit based on clinical studies, including
number of false positive and false negative results observed |
|
|
|
|
Informational materials must clearly communicate
the limitations of window period testing |
|
Test manufacturer should be prepared to offer
users advice and referral mechanisms to obtain proper medical follow-up of
test results |
|
Informational materials must clearly communicate
actions to be taken in the event of a reactive test result |
|
|
|
|
Clear and convenient methods for follow-up
testing and referral must be established and communicated in informational
materials |
|
Counseling must be accessible by means
appropriate to potential desired users, be available at any time, and
counseling information must be clearly communicated in informational
materials |
|
|
|
|
Does the Committee concur with FDA’s proposed
criteria for test performance (analytical and clinical sensitivity and
specificity) for home-use HIV test kits? |
|
Does the Committee concur with FDA’s proposal
for the Phase II study? |
|
For Phase III studies, which of the options
presented does the committee recommend? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Does the Committee concur with FDA’s proposed
content needed for informational materials provided with home-use HIV test
kits and the steps that should be taken to validate the adequacy of those
informational materials to communicate or provide pathways to adequately
address issues including: |
|
Accuracy of testing |
|
Correct test interpretation |
|
The importance of supplemental testing for
confirmation of positive results |
|
Management of psychological and social issues |
|
Availability of counseling |
|
Medical referral |
|
|
|
|
If the Committee does not concur with any of the
proposals in Questions 1-4, what additional information/modification would
be needed to support approval of a home-use HIV test kit? |
|