|
|
|
|
|
|
|
>1 Million currently infected with HIV |
|
40,000 new HIV infections in the US every year (CDC,
2004) |
|
>250,000 of those infected unaware of their
status (25-33% of all positives) (CDC,
2003;CDC, 2001) |
|
30% of positives, 40% negatives don’t return for
standard antibody test results |
|
Knowledge of HIV infection decreases behavior
that can result in HIV transmission (Liddicoat et al., 2004) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferable - Studies have shown self-testing is
preferable to people at risk who have never tested (Spielberg JAIDS 2003) |
|
Better Access - Self-testing is 25 times more
acceptable than home specimen collection, so access to acceptable testing
would be substantially improved (Spielberg JAIDS 2003) |
|
Overcoming stigma - People with stigma who avoid
clinics may be more likely to test. |
|
Likely safe - Post-Marketing studies of home
specimen collection showed that the vast majority of people with positive
test results accepted referrals or were already in care. (Branson JAMA
1998) No studies have shown increased risk of suicide with HIV testing. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Can people perform the test accurately? |
|
Will people understand the meaning of their test
results? (preliminary, need for confirmation) |
|
Will people who positive results follow up for
counseling, confirmation, and medical care. |
|
What type of education/counseling will be
necessary to ensure accuracy, safety and follow up for confirmatory
testing. |
|
Pre-test counseling – Brochure vs. Computer |
|
Post-test counseling – 24 hour telephone
counseling |
|
How much will people be willing to pay? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Study of 240 people with HIV |
|
Tests performed with written instructions |
|
Difficulties observed, revisions to instructions
made for 7 waves of n=20 |
|
Accuracy evaluated with final instructions N=100 |
|
Preferences assessed N=240 |
|
Willingness to pay assessed N=240 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recruit from populations where marketing is
planned (drugstores, internet, high-risk outreach venues). |
|
How sensitive does an OTC test need to be for
the benefit to outweigh the risk? |
|
Benefit - Number of HIV positive people learning
their status who would not have tested without an OTC test |
|
Risk – If lower sensitivity, number positive
people who would have tested at a clinic but instead used an OTC test |
|
|
|
|
With sensitivity > 80 % the benefits of an
OTC HIV test would outweigh the risks if for every one first-time tester
who tested positive using an OTC < 5 people with HIV switched from
clinic-based testing to OTC. |
|
Conservatively assuming that >25% (HSC 49%, Branson,
JAMA 1998) of the testers will be first-time testers, there will likely be
a ratio of 1 new tester : < 4-5 switchers. |
|
In the least favorable circumstances OTC
sensitivity was 94% so it is likely that the benefits will outweigh the
risks for an OTC rapid HIV test. |
|
|
|
|
|
Post Marketing Studies - Conduct post-marketing
studies to determine actual uptake among those who have never tested vs.
switchers, safety, post-test behaviors and follow up for care. |
|
Integrate into existing CDC National Behavioral
Surveillance |
|
Conduct a follow up assessment of a subset of
customers |
|
|
|
|
Concerns about the risks of self-testing remain
unproven. |
|
The benefits of an over-the-counter HIV test
very likely outweigh the risks. |
|
FDA should move forward quickly to encourage
clinical trials for an OTC rapid HIV test. |
|
Short of a vaccine, a widely accessible
inexpensive OTC HIV test is the only intervention currently available that
could feasibly change the course of the epidemic. |
|
Fast-track the approval - There is no time to
waste. |
|
|
|