Notes
Outline
Over The Counter HIV Testing
A Technology Whose Time has Come
My Background
Need
>1 Million currently infected with HIV
40,000 new HIV infections in the US every year (CDC, 2004)
>250,000 of those infected unaware of their status (25-33% of all positives)  (CDC, 2003;CDC, 2001)
30% of positives, 40% negatives don’t return for standard antibody test results
Knowledge of HIV infection decreases behavior that can result in HIV transmission (Liddicoat et al., 2004)
Why an OTC Rapid Test
Preferable - Studies have shown self-testing is preferable to people at risk who have never tested (Spielberg JAIDS 2003)
Better Access - Self-testing is 25 times more acceptable than home specimen collection, so access to acceptable testing would be substantially improved (Spielberg JAIDS 2003)
Overcoming stigma - People with stigma who avoid clinics may be more likely to test.
Likely safe - Post-Marketing studies of home specimen collection showed that the vast majority of people with positive test results accepted referrals or were already in care. (Branson JAMA 1998) No studies have shown increased risk of suicide with HIV testing.
Questions to be Answered
Can people perform the test accurately?
Will people understand the meaning of their test results? (preliminary, need for confirmation)
Will people who positive results follow up for counseling, confirmation, and medical care.
What type of education/counseling will be necessary to ensure accuracy, safety and follow up for confirmatory testing.
Pre-test counseling – Brochure vs. Computer
Post-test counseling – 24 hour telephone counseling
How much will people be willing to pay?
Preliminary Study of Self-Testing
Study of 240 people with HIV
Tests performed with written instructions
Difficulties observed, revisions to instructions made for 7 waves of n=20
Accuracy evaluated with final instructions N=100
Preferences assessed N=240
Willingness to pay assessed N=240
Accuracy of Self-Tests (N=100)
Preferences (N=240)
Willingness to Pay For Self-Test:
Clinical Trial Considerations
Recruit from populations where marketing is planned (drugstores, internet, high-risk outreach venues).
How sensitive does an OTC test need to be for the benefit to outweigh the risk?
Benefit - Number of HIV positive people learning their status who would not have tested without an OTC test
Risk – If lower sensitivity, number positive people who would have tested at a clinic but instead used an OTC test
Clinical Trial Considerations
With sensitivity > 80 % the benefits of an OTC HIV test would outweigh the risks if for every one first-time tester who tested positive using an OTC < 5 people with HIV switched from clinic-based testing to OTC.
Conservatively assuming that >25% (HSC 49%, Branson, JAMA 1998) of the testers will be first-time testers, there will likely be a ratio of 1 new tester : < 4-5 switchers.
In the least favorable circumstances OTC sensitivity was 94% so it is likely that the benefits will outweigh the risks for an OTC rapid HIV test.
Clinical Trial Considerations
Post Marketing Studies - Conduct post-marketing studies to determine actual uptake among those who have never tested vs. switchers, safety, post-test behaviors and follow up for care.
Integrate into existing CDC National Behavioral Surveillance
Conduct a follow up assessment of a subset of customers
Summary
Concerns about the risks of self-testing remain unproven.
The benefits of an over-the-counter HIV test very likely outweigh the risks.
FDA should move forward quickly to encourage clinical trials for an OTC rapid HIV test.
Short of a vaccine, a widely accessible inexpensive OTC HIV test is the only intervention currently available that could feasibly change the course of the epidemic.
Fast-track the approval - There is no time to waste.