|
1
|
- Lisa K. Naeger, Ph.D.
- Kimberly Struble, Pharm.D.
- Division of Antiviral Drug Products
- Food and Drug Administration
|
|
2
|
|
|
3
|
- TPV showed <4-fold decreased susceptibility against 90% (94/105) of
HIV-1 isolates resistant to APV, ATV,
- IDV, LPV, NFV, RTV, or SQV.
- TPV-resistant viral molecular clones showed decreased susceptibility to
all currently available protease inhibitors except SQV.
|
|
4
|
- Baseline genotype/phenotype and virologic outcome analyses
- Development of resistance on TPV treatment
|
|
5
|
- Baseline genotype/phenotype and virologic outcome analyses
- Development of resistance on TPV treatment
|
|
6
|
|
|
7
|
- Proportion of Responders (confirmed 1 log10 decrease)
- Median DAVG24
- Median change in HIV RNA from Baseline at Week 2, 4, 8, 16, 24
|
|
8
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
10
|
- Number of Baseline PI Mutations
- Type of Baseline PI Mutation
- Baseline TPV Phenotype
|
|
11
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
15
|
- Number of Baseline PI Mutations
- Type of Baseline PI Mutation
- Baseline TPV Phenotype
|
|
16
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
18
|
- Number of Baseline PI Mutations
- Type of Baseline PI Mutation
- Baseline TPV Phenotype
|
|
19
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
23
|
- TPV is a protease inhibitor with antiviral activity against multi
PI-resistant clinical HIV-1 isolates.
- The most common protease mutations that developed in >20% of isolates
from treatment-experience subjects who failed on TPV/r treatment were
- L10I/V/S, I13V, L33V/I/F,
M36V/I/L, V82T or L, and I84V.
- The resistance profile in treatment-naive subjects has not yet been
characterized.
|
|
24
|
- Virologic response rates in TPV/r-treated subjects were reduced when:
- isolates with substitutions at positions I13, V32, M36, I47, Q58, D60
or I84 and substitutions V82S/F/I/L were present at baseline.
- the number of baseline PI mutations was 5 or more.
- Subjects taking T20 with TPV/r were able to achieve >1.5 log10
reductions in viral load through 24 weeks
- the baseline phenotype for TPV was >3.
- Consistent observations were made in each of the analyses conducted by
multiple endpoints.
- 20% more responders in the TPV/r arm compared to CPI/r
- Greater reductions in viral load in TPV/r arm vs. CPI/r arm
|