|
|
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES Public
Health Service
![]()
Food and Drug Administration
1401 Rockville Pike
Rockville, MD 20852-1448
83rd Meeting -
July 21, 2005
Gaithersburg Holiday Inn, 2
Montgomery Village Avenue, Gaithersburg, MD 20877
Topic
III: Prophylaxis of Dextran-Induced
Anaphylactoid Reactions (DIAR) by Dextran 1 Pre-Administration
ISSUE:
The
FDA seeks advice from the Committee regarding informing the medical community
of the risk of dextran-induced anaphylactoid reactions (DIAR) associated with
the use of Dextran 40 and Dextran 70 and the benefit of prophylaxis with
Dextran 1.
BACKGROUND:
Two intravenous dextran solutions, Dextran 40 and Dextran 70, have been marketed in the U.S. for more than 40 years. They are approved for plasma volume expansion in the treatment of hypovolemic shock, as a component of the pump prime for cardiopulmonary bypass, and for postoperative thromboembolic prophylaxis. Because they reduce platelet aggregation and promote blood flow in the microcirculation, dextran solutions are commonly used by plastic and ENT surgeons for patients undergoing plastic reconstruction skin flaps and by vascular surgeons for patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy.
The occurrence of dextran-induced
anaphylactoid reactions (DIAR) ranging in severity from mild erythema (Grade I)
to mild hypotension (Grade II), severe hypotension and bronchospasm (Grade
III), cardiorespiratory arrest (Grade IV), and death (Grade V) have been well
recognized since the 1960s. Grade III-V
reactions are initiated by cross-linking of dextran-specific IgG with dextran
molecules; binding of IgG complexes to receptors located on the membrane
surface of mast cells and basophils triggers them to release potent vasoactive
mediators that cause circulatory collapse and severe bronchoconstriction. The mechanism(s) underlying Grade I and II
reactions is (are) not clear.
In the early 1970s, researchers studying a canine
model of DIAR discovered that administration of hapten, Dextran 1 (molecular weight 1000), immediately before
administration of Dextran 40, greatly reduced the incidence of severe
hypotension.1 Shortly thereafter, a series of prospective, very
large (N=76,290), multicenter clinical trials were undertaken in Scandinavia
that compared the incidence of severe DIAR in Dextran 40/Dextran 70 subjects
receiving Dextran 1 versus the incidence of severe DIAR in a pre-Dextran 1 era,
historical control cohort;2-4 individuals in the control cohort came
from the same Swedish, Finnish, and Norwegian hospitals as in the prospective
trials.5 These studies
reported that pre-injecting 20 mL Dextran 1 reduced the incidence of severe
DIAR from a control event rate of 25 cases/100,000 units Dextran 40/Dextran 70
to 3/100,000 units. Publication of
these findings soon led to licensure of Dextran 1 in Sweden and other
countries, e.g., Dextran 1 was approved in the U.S. in 1984. The labeled indication for Dextran 1 is for
prophylaxis of DIAR. According to a
postmarketing surveillance study that compared historical control data with
data from dextran manufacturers and from the World Health Organization database
INTDIS for the period 1983-1992, introduction of Dextran 1 into clinical
practice was associated with a 35-fold reduction in the incidence of severe
DIAR and a 90-fold reduction in the incidence of lethal DIAR.6
DISCUSSION:
Three manufacturers currently market Dextran 40
and/or Dextran 70 in the U.S.: Baxter, B. Braun, and Hospira; the only
manufacturer of Dextran 1 is Meda AB.
FDA review and evaluation of the labeling for the Dextran 40 and 70
products revealed that the recommendation to pre-inject Dextran 1 to reduce the
incidence of severe DIAR was present in the labeling of the first Dextran 40
product marketed in the U.S. (by Pharmacia), but NOT in the labeling of
products marketed subsequently by Baxter, B. Braun, and Hospira. Our review of the Adverse Events Reporting
System (AERS) database showed that 90 cases of severe DIAR had been reported
for the period 1969-2004. For most of
the reported cases, we do not know whether or not the patients were pretreated
with Dextran 1. Since AERS is a passive
reporting system, the actual incidence of severe DIAR is likely to be higher,
especially since Dextran 40 and Dextran 70 have been approved for decades. Based on our review of the published
literature and on reports received in the AERS safety database, we believe that
steps should be taken to better inform the medical community regarding the risk
of DIAR associated with the use of Dextran 40 and Dextran 70, and the benefit
of prophylaxis with Dextran 1. Towards that end, we have engaged the product
manufacturers in a dialogue to discuss their findings and interpretations
regarding this safety issue and to solicit proposals for dissemination of
appropriate medical information. We
will invite the manufacturers to present their perspectives and proposals at
the BPAC meeting, and we will entertain a discussion on the most appropriate
response to this concern.
QUESTIONS FOR THE COMMITTEE:
Please
discuss what revisions to the product labeling for Dextran 40 and Dextran
70 would be most appropriate to address
the risk of DIAR and the relevance of pre-treatment with Dextran 1. In particular, please comment
a.
whether
a class labeling change is warranted, and
b.
what
other forms of risk communication FDA should consider to alert the medical
community about the risk of DIAR.
REFERENCES:
1.
Richter,
W. Built-in hapten inhibition of
anaphylaxis by the low molecular weight fractions of a B 512 dextran fraction
of MW 3400. Int Arch Allergy
1973;45:930
2.
Ljungstrom
K-G, Renck H, Hedin H, et al.
Prevention of dextran-induced anaphylactic reactions by hapten
inhibition. I. A Scandinavian
multicenter study on the effects of 10 mL Dextran 1, 15%, administered before
Dextran 70 or Dextran 40. Acta Chir
Scand 1983;149:341-348
3.
Renck
H, Ljungstrom K-G, Rosberg B, et al.
Prevention of dextran-induced anaphylactic reactions by hapten
inhibition. II. A comparison of 20 mL
Dextran 1, 15%, administered either admixed to or before Dextran 70 or Dextran
40. Acta Chir Scand
1983;149:349-353
4.
Renck,
H, Ljungstrom K-G, Hedin H, et al.
Prevention of dextran-induced anaphylactic reactions by hapten
inhibition. III. A Scandinavian
multicenter study on the effects of 20 mL Dextran 1, 15%, administered before
Dextran 70 or Dextran 40. Acta Chir
Scand 1983;149:355-360
5.
Ljungstrom
K-G, Renck H, Strandberg K, et al.
Adverse reactions to dextran in Sweden 1970-1979. Acta Chir Scand
1983;149:253-262
6.
Hedin
H, Ljungstrom K-G. Prevention of
dextran anaphylaxis. Ten years
experience with hapten dextran. Int Arch Allergy Immunol
1997;113:358-359