Addendum to Roche the January 25, 2004 Roche Advisory Committee
Briefing Document
This Addendum Report is being submitted on behalf of all
the FDA approved generic manufacturers and distributors of Isotretinoin
Capsules to provide comments on the proposal for an enhanced risk management program for
the prevention of pregnancy as outlined in the January 25, 2004 Roche Advisory Committee Briefing
Document. Generic isotretinoin
capsules were first introduced to the US market in December 2002. Today, there are three generic companies
distributing a therapeutically equivalent (AB rated) version of isotretinoin
capsules in addition to Roche’s Accutane®.
|
Product |
Company
|
Risk
Management Program |
ANDA
No. |
Approval
Date |
|
Amnesteem® |
Mylan/Bertek
– Distributor Genpharm
|
S.P.I.R.I.T.1 |
75-495 |
Nov. 2002 |
|
Sotret® |
Ranbaxy
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. |
I.M.P.A.R.T.2 |
76-041 76-503 |
December
2002 June
2003 |
|
Claravis® |
Barr
Laboratories |
A.L.E.R.T.3 |
76-135 76-356 |
April
2003 April
2003 |
1System to Prevent Isotretinoin-Related
Issues ofand
Teratogenicity.
2Isotretinoin Medication
Program Alerting you to the Risks of Teratogenicity.
3Adverse Event Learning and
Education Regarding Teratogenicity.
As
part of the FDA requirements for the approval of an ANDA for isotretinoin capsules,
the generic product must have the same or equivalent labeling and risk
management program as the innovator product.
Therefore, all the generic products have risk managements
programs that are the same as Roche’s S.M.A.R.T. program.
FDA
called a meeting on December 10, 2003 of all manufacturers and distributors of
isotretinoin capsules to discuss the Agency’s findings and concerns with the
current isotretinoin risk management program for the prevention of pregnancy. FDA informed the companies of the planned
joint meeting of the Drug Safety and Risk Management Advisory Committee and the
Dermatologic and Ophthalmic Drugs Advisory Committee on February 26 and 27,
2004 to discuss the effectiveness of the isotretinoin risk management program for
the prevention of fetal exposure to Accutane and its generic equivalents, and
consider whether changes to this isotretinoin risk management program would be
appropriate. During the December 10th
meeting, FDA suggested that, ideally, the companies should work together to
develop a consensus proposal to enhance the current risk management program.
They also strongly suggested that any proposal contain a plan for a single
repository or registry for data collection to permit meaningful analysis of
data (Note- there are currently two separate voluntary registries surveys that collect information on
female patients being treated with isotretinoinfor female
patients. Roche maintains one surveyregistry, and
the Slone Institute at Boston University maintains the other registry survey under contract
by the generic companies.) FDA informed the companies that an industry proposal
was due to the Agency on January 26, 2004 to assure adequate lead-time for FDA
review and dissemination to Advisory Committee members. This proposal would then be presented at the
Advisory Committee Meeting in February.
The Agency primarily focused
on the fact that the absolute number of pregnancies reported the year prior to
the initiation of the current S.M.A.R.T.
Program and those reported during the first year after its full
implementation were about the same.
Because there is no way to determine the actual rate of pregnancies or
to know how completely pregnancies were reported, it is not possible to
determine whether the implementation of the S.M.A.R.T. risk management program
resulted in increased pregnancy reporting or that the program failed to
decrease the number of fetal exposures.
However, at FDA’s
request, all of the generic companies and Roche agreed to discuss and propose enhancements to the
current risk management program as a way to further reduce the
potential for fetal exposure to isotretinoin.
believe that program
enhancements to the current risk management program would be beneficial in
reducing fetal exposure.
Realizing
that there was very little time for all the companies, the generics and Roche,
to reach consensus, immediately following the FDA meeting, the companies met and agreed to work together to develop one
proposal for submission to the Agency.
Representatives of all companies met on two additional occasions to develop a single
consensus proposal. During these
meetings, the companies developed a unified program by reaching consensus on
sixteen points creating the core concepts and processes for developing a
foundation for the enhanced risk management program for the prevention of
pregnancy (See Attachment 1). The key
components of the enhanced risk management program are the following:
·
Mandatory
prescriber registration.
·
Mandatory
registration of all female patients receiving a prescription for isotretinoin.
·
Prescriber
attestation of patient education/qualification in the system for each
isotretinoin prescription.
·
Mandatory
reporting to the system of the results of a pregnancy test (for female patients
of childbearing potential) conducted by an accredited laboratory within an
appropriate time frame.
·
Mandatory
use of a Qualification Sticker on each isotretinoin prescription (Note- sticker
would designate male or female patient).
·
Dispensing
of isotretinoin to female patients only if a current negative pregnancy test
(for females of child bearing potential) is recorded in the system and the
system provides an appropriate authorization number prior to dispensing or for
a male patient if the appropriate authorization sticker is affixed to the
prescription.
·
Requires
the pharmacist to access the registry system to confirm an authorization to
dispense the drug for each and every prescription for a female patient
·
Mandatory
identification of product.
·
Centralized
mechanism for reporting and follow-up of pregnancies.
On
January 16, 2004, Roche, on behalf of all of the companies, sent a draft
process flow diagram (See Attachment 2) and a high level description containing
the sixteen consensus points for the proposed pregnancy risk management program
(See Attachment 1) to the Agency. The
companies and FDA participated in a teleconference on January 23, 2004 to
discuss the Agency’s comments on the consensus proposal. The primary comments from the Agency on the
proposal concernedfocused on three areasissues:
(l) Registration of male patients in addition to
female patients versus only female patients;
(2) Patient interaction with the educational and
risk management evaluation component of the program; and
(3) A firmer link between the registry and the
pharmacist - perhaps through pharmacy registration.
Immediately
following the FDA/Company teleconference, the companies met via teleconference
to discuss the Agency comments and determine next steps. All companies continue
to support the 16-point consensus proposal as submitted to FDA on Jan. 23,
2004; however, there was not consensus on how to address the three issues the FDA raised during the
teleconference. Since the
briefing document was due to
be sent to FDA that day, there was inadequate time for the companies to discuss
and reach consensus on how to address the Agency’s January 23, 2004 comments. Because of this, Roche decided to submit a separate briefing
document that included the original sixteen-point consensus proposal agreed to by all
companies along with their own plan to address the three issues raised in the
FDA teleconference.
to resolve the differences
between Roche and the generic companies on the approach to address the Agency’s
comments. Therefore, Roche decided to submit a
separate briefing document that included the original sixteen-point consensus
proposal but also added additional points to address the three issues raised in
the FDA teleconference.
All companies continue
to support the 16-point consensus proposal as submitted to FDA on January 16, 2004; however, we
have not yet reached consensus on how to address the three
issues the FDA raised during the January 23, 2004 teleconference. The generic companies
firmly agree that enhancements to the current isotretinoin risk management
program are appropriate. We
continue to support the overall proposal as submitted in the Roche briefing
document with the exceptions of the three issues described above.
Due to the limited
meeting time available to the companies between the Jan. 23, 2004 FDA
teleconference and the Jan. 26, 2004 submission date, the companies were not
able to adequately discuss the proposals to address the Agency’s comments on our original consensus sixteen-point
proposal in order to reach a consensus. With respect to three issues raised
during the FDA/Company teleconference, T the
generic companies have taken them these three issues under advisement and
request that they be addressed at the advisory committee meeting in the context of the reason for the Agency’s
requested enhancements to the existing isotretinoin risk management program, i.e., the reduction of
fetal exposure.
changes proposed to the
isotretinoin risk management program.