|
1
|
- Joel Morganroth, M.D.
- Clinical Professor of Medicine
- University of Pennsylvania
- Chief Scientist, eResearchTechnology
|
|
2
|
- Increased risk of torsades de pointes (potentially fatal polymorphic
ventricular tachycardia) as QTc interval increases - not all cases had
QTc >500 msec
|
|
3
|
|
|
4
|
- Terodiline GU
- Terfenadine Antihistamine
- Astemizole Antihistamine
- Sertindole CNS
- Grepafloxacin Antibiotic
- Droperidol CNS
- Cisapride GI
|
|
5
|
- Mean change in QTc at clinical dose:
- 6 msec (retrospectively detected by digital manual ECG analysis after
marketing)
- Mean change in QTc at Tmax (Mean max change) - 18 msec
- Max change in the presence of a metabolic inhibitor (ketoconazole) –
50-100 msec
- Benefit: reduce minimal symptoms
- Risk: death
- Result: Removed from the Market
|
|
6
|
- CNS: ziprasadone, thioridazine, risperidone
- Antibiotics: clarithromycin, ketoconazole, fluconazole, moxifloxacin
- Neoplastic Agents: arsenic, tamoxifen
- Anti-rejection: tacrolimus
- Class I and III Antiarrhythmic Agents: quinidine, sotalol, amiodarone
|
|
7
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
11
|
- QTc is the QT corrected for heart rate (QT decreases as the heart rate
increases)
- How to correct is the subject of FDA-TPD guidance:
- Bazett formula (QT/RR0.5)
- Undercorrects at low heart rates-most limitations
- Fridericia formula (QT/RR0.33)
- Least limitations of the fixed exponent correction
- Population Based – find exponent for placebo treated and baseline QT
and RR ECG data for a “disease”
- Recommended for ISS ECG Analysis
- Individual Based – find exponent for each subject using at least 50-100
ECGs at baseline (pre treatment)
- Most accurate – best considered for definitive Phase I ECG Trial
|
|
12
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
14
|
- Mean Change* of QTc Duration
- (Degree of outliers equally important)
- < 5 msec - probably no concern
- 5 - 10 msec - increasing concern
- 10-20 msec - uncertain concern
- > 20 msec - definite
concern
- BUT DEPENDS ON RISK-BENEFIT OF THERAPY
|
|
15
|
- Preclinical Data provides Clues but Trumped by Adequate Clinical Data
- Thorough Phase I ECG Trial Now Recommended to Judge Intensity of ECGs
in Phase II and III
- Phase II and III ECG Data in the Target Population
- Integrated Summary of Cardiac Safety Should Provide Most Robust Analysis
|