|
|
|
Lynne M. Mofenson, M.D. |
|
Pediatric, Adolescent and Maternal AIDS Branch |
|
National Institute of Child Health and Human
Development |
|
National Institutes of Health |
|
Department of Health and Human Services |
|
|
|
|
|
Perinatal transmission in the U.S.: |
|
PACTG 076 - mechanism efficacy |
|
Risk factors for transmission in antiretroviral
era |
|
Transmission in the post-076 era |
|
Challenges |
|
Perinatal transmission global basis |
|
Short-course antiretroviral prophylaxis trials
results and relevance to U.S. |
|
Challenges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
In U.S., ~6,000-7,000 HIV-infected women give
birth annually. |
|
Prior to 1994, ~25% of infants born to HIV+
mothers became infected. |
|
Thus, 1,500-1,750 infants newly infected with
HIV were born each year before 1994. |
|
More than 16,000 HIV-infected children born in
the U.S. since the beginning of the epidemic. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect on viral load: In PACTG 076, change in HIV RNA accounted for only 17% of
observed AZT efficacy (Sperling et al. NEJM 1996;335:1621-9). |
|
Two other important mechanisms through which AZT
reduces transmission: |
|
Pre-exposure prophylaxis of infant (through
transplacental AZT passage). |
|
Post-exposure prophylaxis of infant (through
continued AZT administration to the infant after birth). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Meta-analysis of 7 prospective cohorts/trials. |
|
44 cases transmission among 1,202 HIV+ women
with delivery HIV RNA <1,000. |
|
Transmission differed by receipt of AZT: |
|
Mothers receiving AZT: 8/834, 1.0% |
|
Mothers not receiving AZT: 36/368, 9.8% |
|
Multivariate analysis (adjusting for maternal
CD4 count, mode delivery and infant birth weight), AZT independently
reduced transmission. |
|
Data show importance of infant pre- and
post-exposure prophylaxis in addition to lowering maternal viral load as
mechanism prevention. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chuachoowong R et al. J Infect Dis 2000;181:99-106 |
|
Quantified CVL HIV RNA at 38 weeks gestation in
310 women in Thai short-course AZT trial. |
|
Presence CVL RNA associated with 3.4-fold
increase in transmission; effect independent of plasma RNA, and greatest
when plasma RNA low. |
|
AP AZT was associated with median 0.8 log
decrease in HIV RNA in CVL. |
|
Tuomala RE et al. J Infect Dis 2003;187:375-84 |
|
Assessed cell-associated HIV DNA in CVL in 78
women receiving antiretroviral therapy (65% AZT alone, 33% combination
therapy). |
|
Detection/titer of CVL DNA associated with
transmission; 2.3-fold increase for each 1 log increase DNA. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 1994: PACTG 076 results announced |
|
Aug 1994: U.S. Public Health Service guidelines
for use AZT to prevent transmission published. |
|
July 1995:
U.S. Public Health Service guidelines for prenatal HIV counseling
and testing. |
|
Periodic updates to guidelines when new
information becomes available: |
|
Latest update prophylaxis guidelines: Nov 2002 |
|
Latest update testing guidelines: Nov 2001 |
|
|
|
|
|
Maternal plasma HIV RNA >1,000: |
|
HAART |
|
Elective C/S if >1,000 near delivery |
|
Maternal plasma HIV RNA <1,000: |
|
HAART or use of PACTG 076 AZT alone |
|
No treatment prior to labor: |
|
Intrapartum-postpartum AZT; AZT/3TC; nevirapine;
or AZT/nevirapine |
|
No treatment prior to or during labor: |
|
Infant prophylaxis for 6 weeks with combination
regimen or AZT alone |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mother to child transmission has been reduced to
<2% in the U.S. |
|
Number of infected infants born each year in
U.S. has decreased from 2,000 before 1994 to under 300-400 currently. |
|
Reduction transmission secondary to: |
|
Enhanced prenatal HIV counseling and testing. |
|
Recognition of the importance of viral load in
transmission, and increase in use of HAART by pregnant women. |
|
Increase in elective cesarean delivery. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining significant barriers to elimination of
perinatal HIV in U.S.: |
|
Continued HIV transmission to women,
especially adolescents, who have
high rates of unintended pregnancy. |
|
Lack of prenatal care, particularly in women who
are illicit drug users (15% of HIV-infected women lack prenatal care). |
|
Failure to identify HIV infection during
pregnancy. |
|
Antiretroviral drug resistance. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Frequency of antiretroviral resistance mutations
among newly infected persons increasing: |
|
Grant et al. JAMA 2002;288:181-8 (San Francisco) |
|
From 1996-97 to 2000-01(N=225) |
|
NRTI: 25% to 21% |
|
NNRTI: 0% to 13% |
|
PI: 3% to 8% |
|
Resistance correlated with viral response |
|
Little et al. NEJM 2002;347:385-94 (10 cities) |
|
From 1995-98 to 1998-2000 (N=377) |
|
Any: 8%
to 23% |
|
Multidrug: 4% to 10% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
more pregnant women are now
treatment-experienced. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mofenson L et al. AIDS Conf 2002 |
|
PACTG 185 (86% AZT, 14% combo NRTI),
case-control study of 24 transmitters, 72 controls |
|
At delivery: |
|
AZT resistance: 25% transmitters vs 11% controls
(p=0.14) |
|
Any NRTI resistance: 46% transmitters, 25%
controls (p=0.15) |
|
Welles S et al.
AIDS 2000;14:253-71 |
|
WITS, case-control study of 142 pregnant women |
|
Prevalence AZT resistance, 24% |
|
Multivariate analysis, genotypic AZT resistance
associated with 5.1-fold increased risk transmission |
|
At present, most cases of antiretroviral failure
with transmission despite antiretroviral prophylaxis are not due to drug
resistance, but this may change as resistance becomes more frequent. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Globally, >2 million HIV-infected women give
birth annually, most in resource-poor countries, where regimens used in US
are too complex and expensive to use. |
|
Transmission rates in breastfeeding women
without antiretroviral prophylaxis are between 25-40%. |
|
About 2,000 children become infected daily; in
2002, an estimated 800,000 infants were newly infected with HIV. |
|
An estimated 3.2 million children were living
with HIV in 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Following PACTG 076: |
|
Need to develop shorter, less expensive regimens
more applicable to resource-limited settings. |
|
Studies first focused on modifications of
AZT-alone prophylactic regimens. |
|
Studies also explored whether short-course
combination regimens might have improved efficacy. |
|
Studies asked if similar efficacy to combination
could be achieved with alternative drugs that were less expensive and could
be used in simple regimens. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-course AZT prophylaxis is effective. |
|
Longer (28 weeks) antepartum treatment is more
effective than shorter (36 weeks) antepartum therapy, showing that a
significant proportion of in utero infection occurs between 28 and 36
weeks. |
|
Efficacy of prophylaxis is diminished by
breastfeeding, but still persists at 24 months with short-course AZT. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After short-course AZT found effective,
researchers then asked if short-course combination regimens would be more
effective than AZT alone. |
|
AZT/3TC prophylaxis appears more effective than
AZT alone. |
|
3-part AP/IP/PP drug prophylaxis is more
effective than IP/PP alone. |
|
IP-only not effective, showing importance of
post-exposure prophylaxis component. |
|
Efficacy diminished by breastfeeding and did not
persist at 18 mos for the IP/PP AZT/3TC regimen. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research asked whether alternative drugs (like
nevirapine) might provide efficacy similar to short combination regimens. |
|
When only IP/PP prophylaxis is given,
single-dose NVP is superior to IP/PP AZT alone, and similar to IP/PP
AZT/3TC. |
|
Efficacy diminished by breastfeeding, but while 2-part AZT/3TC was not effective
at 18 months, NVP retained efficacy. |
|
Addition of single-dose NVP to short-course AZT
appears to improve efficacy. |
|
However, adding NVP to standard regimens used in
U.S. does not offer additional benefit. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Many women may not present until in labor and
only infant prophylaxis may be possible. |
|
Epidemiologic data suggest infant AZT for 6
weeks after birth reduces transmission. |
|
Infant prophylaxis must begin within 24-48 hours
after birth to be effective when the mother has not received AP/IP drug. |
|
Preliminary data suggest: |
|
Single dose NVP given to the infant at birth may
have efficacy similar to AZT. |
|
Single dose NVP plus AZT may have better
efficacy than NVP alone if mother hasn’t received single dose IP NVP. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shorter, less expensive regimens than PACTG 076
have been found to be effective in reducing in utero and intrapartum
transmission by 41-63%. |
|
Although breastfeeding decreases the overall
efficacy, most trials still show a significant decrement at 18-24 months. |
|
New approaches, including infant or maternal
prophylaxis are targeted at reducing postnatal transmission. |
|
Implementation of known effective regimens is
now key. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|