Table of Contents
Evaluation of Written Prescription Information Provided in Community Pharmacies: A National Study
Study done in cooperation with...
National Expert Panel
Panelists
Past Studies
How does this study differ?
Primary Aims of Study
Secondary Aims of Study
Objectives for Today
Study Design
Sampling of Pharmacies
Observer Protocol
Standard Scenario
Observer Protocol (cont.)
Expert Evaluation Forms
Eight Criteria from 1996 Action Plan for Useful Information
Eight Criteria from 1996 Action Plan for Useful Information
Scoring Method for Expert Forms
Scoring Categories
Inter-rater Reliability
Expert Rating Process
Consumer Evaluation Form
Scoring Categories for Consumer Form
Three Legibility Items
Six Comprehensibility Items
Three Summary Items
Test-Retest Reliability
Consumer Rating Process
Rater Characteristics
% Patient-Observers Given Any Written Information
Expert Ratings, All Criteria (n=1,367 leaflets)
Expert Ratings by Criterion
Highest Expert Ratings - Criterion 7 Scientifically Accurate, Unbiased, Up-to-date
Moderate Expert Ratings - Criteria 1 & 3
Low Expert Ratings - Criteria 5 & 6
Lowest Expert Ratings - Criteria 2 & 4
Lowest Expert Ratings - Criterion 8Legibility/Comprehensibility
Consumer Ratings, All Items (%)
Consumer Scores by Item
Consumer Scores on Readability & Understandability Items
Consumer Scores on Usefulness Item
Expert Versus Consumer Ratings
Expert Rating of Usefulness by Consumer Rating of Usefulness Item (n=339 atenolol leaflets)
Conclusions -- Part I
Results -- Part IIWhat factors might influence leaflet ratings?
Leaflet Ratings by Consumer Characteristics
Leaflet Distribution and Ratings by Pharmacy Type
Expert Ratings by Leaflet Length
Consumer Ratings by Leaflet Length
Consumer Ratings by Font Size
Consumer Ratings of Readability by Font Size
Data Vendors Examined
Leaflet Length by Vendor
Results By Data Vendor
Expert Ratings by Vendor
Ratings of Atenolol Leaflets by Vendor
Ratings of Atenolol Leaflets by Vendor
Consumer Ratings by Vendor
Consumer Ratings of Atenolol Leaflets by Vendor
Data Vendor by Pharmacy Type
Analysis of Vendor 1 Leaflets
Results
Expert Ratings by Leaflet Version
Expert Ratings by Leaflet Version
Additions/Deletions from Prototypes
Ratings of Distributed Versus Prototype Leaflets -- Atenolol Version 1
Ratings of Distributed Versus Prototype Leaflets -- Atenolol Version 2
Ratings of Distributed Versus Prototype Leaflets -- Atenolol Version 3
Conclusions (1)
Conclusions (2)
Conclusions (3)
Examples
|