Skip Navigation
FDA Logo links to FDA home page
U.S. Food and Drug Administration
HHS Logo links to Department of Health and Human Services website

FDA Home Page | Search FDA Site | A-Z Index | Contact FDA

Office of Management
Budget Formulation and Presentation

horizonal rule

FY 2007 Table of Contents

HUMAN DRUGS

FY 2005 Actual

FY 2006 Enacted 1/

FY 2007 Estimate

Increase or Decrease

Program Level

$482,134,000

$517,557,000

$534,961,000

+$17,404,000

Center

396,036,000,2,220

$431,705,000

$448,961,000

+$17,256,000

FTE

$86,098,000

2,360

2,382

+22

Field

698

$85,852,000

$86,000,000

+$148,000

FTE

664

659

(5)

Program Level FTE

2,918

3,024

3,041

17

Budget Authority

$291,484,000

$297,716,000

$305,003,000

+$7,287,000

Center

$210,481,000

$217,797,000

$225,209,000

$7,412,000

Field

$81,003,000

$79,919,000

$79,794,000

-$125,000

Critical Path

$750,000

$6,690,000

+$5,940,000

Drug Safety

$26,900,000

$36,531,000

$40,095,000

+$3,564,000

Cost of Living

$4,874,000

+4,874,000

Strategic Redeployment

($7,091,000)

($7,091,000)

FTE

(20)

(20)

Budget Authority FTE

1,837

1,914

1,906

(8)

User Fees

$190,650,000

$219,841,000

$229,958,000

+$10,117,000

Center PDUFA

$185,555,000

$213,908,000

$223,752,000

+$9,844,000

Field PDUFA

$5,095,000

$5,933,000

$6,206,000

+$273,000

User Fee FTE

1,081

1,110

1,135

+25

   1/  Includes a one percent rescission.

 

Historical Funding and FTE Levels

Fiscal Year

Program Level

Budget Authority

User Fees

Program Level FTE

2003 Actual

$403,848,000

$274,073,000

$129,775,000

2,696

2004 Actual

$396,491,000

$229,372,000

$167,119,000

2,190

2005 Actual

$482,134,000

$291,484,000

$190,650,000

2,918

2006 Enacted

$517,557,000

$297,716,000

$219,841,000

3,024

2007 Estimate

$534,961,000

$305,003,000

$229,958,000

3,041

Statement of Budget Request

The Human Drugs Program is requesting $534,961,000 in program level resources for accomplishing its mission activities including:

Program Description

The Human Drugs Program is responsible for ensuring that America's supply of brand name, over the counter, and generic drugs is adequately available, safe and effective, and of the highest quality.  The process for approving drug products begins with the companies who must first test their products.  CDER monitors their clinical research to ensure that people who volunteer for studies are protected and that the quality and integrity of scientific data are maintained.  CDER assembles a team of physicians, statisticians, chemists, pharmacologists, and other scientists to review the company's data and proposed use of the drug. If the drug is deemed effective and if health benefits outweigh its risks, the drug is approved for sale. CDER does not actually test the drug when the Center reviews the company's data. By setting clear standards for the evidence FDA needs to approve a drug, the Agency helps medical researchers bring new drugs to American consumers more rapidly.

Once a drug is approved for sale in the United States, FDA continues to monitor the use of marketed drugs for unexpected health risks. If new, unanticipated risks are detected after approval, steps are taken to inform the public and change how a drug is used or, if necessary, even remove a drug from the market. CDER also monitors product manufacturing changes to make sure that changes to the way drug products are made do not adversely affect the safety or efficacy of the medicine. CDER evaluates reports about suspected problems from manufacturers, health care professionals, and consumers. Sometimes, manufacturers run into production problems that might endanger the health of patients who depend on a drug. CDER tries to make sure that an adequate supply of drugs is always available.

In addition to setting standards for safety and effectiveness testing, CDER also sets standards for drug quality and manufacturing processes.  FDA works closely with manufacturers to see where streamlining can cut red tape without compromising drug quality. As the pharmaceutical industry has become increasingly global, CDER is involved in international negotiations with other nations to harmonize standards for drug quality and the data needed to approve a new drug. This harmonization will go a long way toward reducing the number of redundant tests manufacturers do and help ensure drug quality for consumers at home and abroad.

Accurate and complete information are vital to the safe use of drugs. Drug companies have historically promoted their products directly to physicians. More and more frequently now, they are advertising directly to consumers. While the FTC regulates advertising of over-the-counter drugs, CDER oversees the advertising of prescription drugs.

FDA conducts and collaborates on focused laboratory research and testing. Research maintains and strengthens the scientific base of CDER's regulatory policy-making and decision-making.  Most recently, and consistent with the Agency's Critical Path Initiative, FDA is focusing on new ways to review drug quality, safety, and performance; evaluate improved technologies; validate new approaches to drug development and review; and develop regulatory standards and consistency.

The field component, the Office of Regulatory Affairs (ORA), supports the Human Drugs Program by conducting risk-based domestic and foreign premarket and postmarket inspections of drug manufacturers to assess their compliance with Good Manufacturing Practices (GMPs).  Besides overseeing regulated products on a surveillance or "for cause" basis, ORA staff also respond to emergencies and investigate incidents of product tampering and terrorist events or natural disasters.  To complement the regular field force, the Office of Criminal Investigations investigates instances of criminal activity in FDA regulated industries.

During the latest performance period (FY 2005), the Human Drugs program successfully met seven of its center performance measures; expects to meet the other three when the data is reported; and met its one field performance goal.  CDER expects to successfully achieve the target for its Generic Drugs performance goal when data becomes available. For more information about these performance goals and results, please see the Performance Detail section.

Performance Highlight: 

FY 2007 Goal Target

FY 2004 Results

Context

Decrease the average FDA time to approval or tentative approval for the fastest 25% of original generic drugs applications by 0.5 months.

FDA exceeded its goal for FY 2004 by acting on 91 percent of 563 original applications.

Generic drugs are much appreciated for their cost-effectiveness.   The basic requirements for approval of generic and trade-name drugs are the same as new drug approvals, although the generic drug manufacturer does not need to repeat the safety and efficacy studies conducted by the developer of the original product.  Prior to approval, generic drug sponsors are required to demonstrate bioequivalence to the innovator drug product by showing that the active ingredient in their product is absorbed at a rate and extent similar to the innovator counterpart.  The approval time is measured from the date the application is received to the date a major action, either an approval or not approvable, is reached.

Program Resource Changes

Drug Safety:     + $3,564,000 and +6 FTE

FDA requests an increase of $3,960,000 to improve drug safety through modernizing and expanding the existing drug safety system.  To improve drug safety, we will create an enhanced Adverse Events Reporting System and collaborate with the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.  These activities will enable FDA to more efficiently and effectively track adverse events, analyze and interpret findings, take appropriate regulatory action and transmit critical drug safety information to health care practitioners and consumers.  This initiative will contribute to the Secretary's goal to reduce the number of preventable injuries and deaths among Americans.  The Human Drugs Program component of this request is $3,564,000 and 6 FTE.

Critical Path to Personalized Medicine:  +$5,940,000 and +6 FTE  (CDER)

Under the FDA Modernization Act (P.L. 105-115), Congress expanded FDA's mission to include the promotion of public health through review of clinical research and collaborations with partners in government, academia, and industry.  Coupled with these regulatory changes, the funding of basic biomedical research has doubled in the last few years.  Yet, the number of applications submitted to FDA for review has decreased.

Because the agency sees product development failures industry-wide, FDA, consistent with its public health mission, is in a unique position to identify priority hurdles to medical product development and the means to overcome them.  By facilitating communication between industry and the agency and providing guidance for modernizing the medical product development process (the Critical Path), FDA can overcome the bottlenecks to drug development and ensure that more people have access to the products they need.  

FDA can also assist medical product development by advancing new techniques that will identify product characteristics that make a drug, biological product or device safe and effective for particular individuals. This will allow Americans to benefit from an era of personalized medicine.

The amount requested for this initiative is $5,940,000 and 6 FTE.

Cost of Living:  +$4,874,000

FDA's request for inflationary pay costs is essential to accomplishing our public health mission.  Payroll costs account for more than sixty-percent of the FDA budget, and the Agency is not able to absorb this level of inflation on such a significant portion of its resources. The increase will allow FDA to maintain staffing levels, including a national cadre of specially trained scientific staff. The total estimate for pay increases is $20,267,000. The Human Drugs portion of this increase is $4,874,000. These resources are vitally important for FDA to fulfill its mission to protect the public health by helping safe and effective products reach the market in a timely way, and monitoring products for continued safety after they are in use.

Human Drugs Reductions:  -$7,091,000 and -20 FTE

To fund FY 2007 priority initiatives such as Drug Safety and the Critical Path to Personalized Medicine, FDA re-deployed resources from base programs.  To accomplish this strategic redeployment and fund new, high priority initiatives, Human Drugs reductions include: generic drugs research contracts, animal care contract services, research/lab scientists, laboratory upkeep, and communications, staff for FOI requests, management services, and information processing modernization for the generic drugs program. 

Prescription Drug User Fee Act:  +$10,117,000 and 25 FTE

PDUFA authorized FDA to collect fees from the pharmaceutical industry to augment appropriations spent on drug review.  These fees expand the resources available for the process of reviewing human drug applications.  Fee resources pay for the salaries of scientists and other professionals who review drug applications, and for information management, space costs, acquisition of fixtures, furniture, equipment and other materials necessary to conduct drug product reviews and to ensure that safe and effective drug products reach the American public more quickly. 

In 2002, the Bioterrorism Act included PDUFA III, which reauthorized FDA to collect user fees to enhance the review process of new human drugs and biological products.   PDUFA III also reauthorized fees for applications, establishments and approved products.  The reauthorization directs FDA to strengthen and improve the review and monitoring of drug safety, consider greater interaction with sponsors during the review of drugs and biologics intended to treat serious diseases and life-threatening diseases, and develop principles for improving first-cycle reviews.  The increases will contribute to meeting these directives. 

In FY 2007, FDA will work with Congress on the reauthorization of the Prescription Drug User Fee Act. This increase of $10,117,000 will cover inflationary costs, as well as overhead and rent costs, for additional staff associated with the Act. 

Proposed Fees (Reclassified as Mandatory - Non-Add)

Reinspection User Fee (Mandatory):  $2,009,000 and 16 FTE (Non-Add)

The Administration is proposing authorizing legislation that requires establishments to pay the full costs of reinspections and associated follow-up work when FDA reinspects facilities due to failure to meet Good Manufacturing Practices (GMPs) or other important FDA requirements.  Under this proposal, these activities will be reclassified as mandatory user fees in FY 2007.  FDA currently funds this activity through discretionary appropriations.  Imposing a fee would generate $22.0 million in revenue, an amount sufficient to fully fund reinspections.  The Human Drugs program component of this user fee is $2,009,000 and 16 FTE.

Justification of Base

FDA Strategic Goal: Enhancing Patient and Consumer Protection and Empowering Them with Better Information about Regulated Products

The practical size of pre-marketing clinical trials means that CDER cannot learn everything about the safety of a drug before approval.  Therefore, a degree of uncertainty always exists about the risks of drugs.  This uncertainty requires CDER's continued vigilance to collect and assess data during the post-marketing life of a drug. Once a drug is approved for sale, CDER monitors the use of marketed drugs for unexpected health risks.  If new, unanticipated risks are detected after approval, steps are taken to inform the public and change how a drug is used or even remove a drug from the market.  CDER also monitors manufacturing changes to make sure they won't adversely affect the safety or efficacy of the medicine. CDER evaluates reports about suspected problems from manufacturers, health care professionals and consumers, and tries to make sure that an adequate supply of drugs is always available. FDA also must be vigilant to protect Americans from injuries and deaths caused by unsafe, illegal, fraudulent, and substandard or improperly used products. Among the key functions performed by the Program are:

A comprehensive safety system for medical products is a critical priority. FDA's current systems are not intended to, and cannot, uncover the incidence of adverse events, their preventability, or the overall health and economic impact on Americans.  FDA has been partnering with others in DHHS to promote patient safety and prevent medical errors. To supplement CDER's adverse event data, FDA is working to establish contracts for safety monitoring data links that include data on product exposure and extensive patient information. CDER is developing access to external databases with other government agencies, states, academia, and independent health organizations such as hospitals, to enhance FDA's ability to monitor the public health impact of FDA regulated products.

Enhanced Communication

FDA is committed to enhancing CDER's communication methods to prevent any harm to the American public that may occur due to the lack of accurate and timely information about a drug product.  FDA's human drug program is engaged in a variety of activities designed to better enable consumers to make informed decisions weighing benefits and risks of FDA-regulated products, and is developing education campaigns to disseminate consumer friendly information on drug products to promote the safety and quality of drug products. Key activities include:

Human Subject Protection

FDA takes its role of protecting human subjects involved in clinical trials very seriously, evidenced by its conscientious daily performance of the following:

Compliance Oversight of Marketed Prescription Drugs

FDA continues to protect the public health by assuring that marketed prescription drugs comply with the new drug approval and labeling requirements of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act.  This helps ensure that drug products available to the consuming public are safe and effective and labeled correctly to assure their proper use.  Major functions include:

Internet Drug Sales

At present, there are an exploding number of new web sites marketing FDA regulated products to the American consumer and medical professionals.  Due to resource limitations, FDA currently conducts only limited levels of web-based oversight, of which the key components are:

Research, Development, and Evaluation (RD&E) Activities

CDER research activities associated with patient safety include:

FDA Strategic Goal: Increasing Access to Innovative Products and Technologies to Improve Health

The Human Drugs Program within FDA is responsible for ensuring the safety and effectiveness of drug and therapeutic biologic products.

New Drug Review

FDA reviews and evaluates New Drug Applications (NDAs) to determine whether or not a new drug is both safe and effective.  Drugs for diseases such as cancer and AIDS are given priority status and evaluated through an accelerated approval process.  Major activities associated with the process include:

Over-the-Counter Drugs

FDA is committed to providing consumers with safe, effective, and affordable drugs.  Increasing the number of safe and effective over-the-counter (OTC) drugs that are available to consumers is consistent with this goal.  Major functions of the program include:

Generic Drugs

FDA continues to support an active generic drugs program to complete review and action on Abbreviated New Drug Applications (ANDAs).  As a result, there are continuing efforts to  expand the availability of high-quality generic drug products to the public and providing consumers with information on their safety and effectiveness.  Generic drugs save consumers billions of dollars each year.  Accordingly, FDA is committed to bringing as many safe and effective generic drugs to market as possible by addressing specific scientific questions regarding bioequivalence and chemistry of generic products. This research will be directed at evaluating ways to enable approval of generic drugs in areas that currently lack generic alternatives, such as inhalation or topical drug products. Key functions of the program include:

 

FDA Approves First Pediatric Generic AIDS Drug for U.S. Marketing

September 2005: FDA announced approval for marketing several generic versions of drugs that treat HIV, the virus that causes AIDS. Previously, the products had been only tentatively approved and were not available in the United States because patent or market exclusivity blocked their approval. With the expiration of those patents, the following products today have receive full marketing authorization for the United States: (1) zidovudine (zye-DOE-vue-deen) tablets manufactured by Ranbaxy Laboratories Limited of Guragon, India; (2) zidovudine tablets and oral solution manufactured by Aurobindo Pharma LTD. Hyderabad, India; and (3) zidovudine tablets manufactured by Roxane Laboratories of Columbus, Ohio, U.S.A. These are the first generic versions of the already-approved Retrovir brand manufactured by GlaxoSmithKline to be approved for marketing in the U.S. FDA previously determined as part of a tentative approval action that these products meet all U.S. manufacturing quality and clinical safety and efficacy standards.

" These approvals will now allow those infected with HIV more access to these life-saving drugs within our country. Some of these products have been available for purchase outside the U.S. as tentatively approved products under the President's Emergency Plan for Aids Relief," said Health and Human Services Secretary Mike Leavitt. "Generic products help reduce costs to patients and for the first time this antiretroviral drug will be available as a generic pediatric dosage form."

 

President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR)

FDA plays a key role in the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR).  In May 2004, in direct support of PEPFAR, Secretary Thompson announced that the FDA would implement a new, expedited review process to ensure that the US could provide safe, effective drugs to developing countries. PEPFAR's major activities are:

Protecting America's Children

CDER is responsible for fulfilling the requirements of recent legislation and for making significant progress in protecting children who need prescription or OTC drug products.  Due to the inadequacy of pediatric use information found in the majority of prescription medications in the U.S., Congress enacted several legislative initiatives to promote drug development for children.  In 1997, as part of the Food and Drug Administration Modernization Act (FDAMA), Congress enacted a law to provide marketing incentives to manufacturers who conduct studies in children.  This law, which provides six months exclusivity in return for conducting pediatric studies requested by the FDA, was reauthorized in January 2002 under the Best Pharmaceuticals for Children Act (BPCA)

As a result of these initiatives, the number of ongoing pediatric clinical trials in the last 5 years has increased dramatically.  The BPCA also established a publicly funded contracting process for studies of drugs that no longer have exclusivity or patent protection for which pediatric studies are needed. Finally, on December 3, 2003, Congress enacted the Pediatric Research Equity Act (PREA) which provides FDA the authority to require pediatric studies for certain new and already marketed drug and biological products. 

Research for Treatments of Orphan Diseases

Office of Orphan Products Development (OOPD) has been dedicated to promoting the development of products that demonstrate promise for the diagnosis and/or treatment of rare diseases or conditions since it was created in 1982. Major activities include:

Research, Development, and Evaluation Activities

Research CDER performs ensures that FDA has sufficient expertise to develop regulatory standards and risk assessment criteria to reach sound, science-based public health decisions. Important components of the research include: 

Planning for Emergencies and Protecting Americans from Terrorism through Medical Countermeasures

Increased funding over the last five years has strengthened CDER's capability to identify, prepare for, and respond to biological, chemical, and radiological/nuclear threats and incidents.  

FDA is engaged in many efforts to promote the development of medical countermeasures, among which are:

FDA Strategic Goal: Improving Product Quality, Safety, and Availability through Better Manufacturing and Product Oversight

Ensuring that the highest possible quality products are marketed is a large part of FDA's mission of protecting the public's health. The Agency ensures product quality by facilitating effective and efficient scientific assessment of relevant pharmaceutical and biotechnology information in regulatory submissions.  The Agency facilitates those scientific and technological innovations that improve understanding of product performance, quality and efficiency of development, manufacturing, and quality assurance processes.   Ensuring quality of products involves recognizing the level of scientific knowledge supporting product applications, process validation, and process capability.  In accomplishment of this strategic goal, CDER performs the following:

Federal Authorities Cease Sale and Distribution of Counterfeit Lipitor

August 2005 FDA and the United States Attorney for the Western District of Missouri, Kansas City, Missouri, today announced the indictments of 11 individuals, a drug repacker, and two wholesale distributors in cases related to the sale of Lipitor, a popular cholesterol reducing drug.

The indictment alleges numerous charges including conspiracy to sell counterfeit, illegally imported and misbranded drugs as well as conspiracy to sell stolen drugs. The conspiracy involved the manufacture of counterfeit Lipitor at a clandestine facility in Central America, the purchase of genuine Lipitor intended for distribution in South America, and the illegal importation into the United States of both products.

 

Managing Quality by Industry Self-Compliance

FDA operates a comprehensive program to guide, assist, and manage industry self-compliance with manufacturing quality objectives of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act. In support of the program, CDER organizes FDA experience and expertise into published guidance on how industry may meet requirements for manufacturing quality on focused areas of technology and procedures.  CDER also provides input on industry-generated voluntary standards and guidance documents to assure broad consensus for effective compliance.

Over the last few years, FDA has conducted a major effort to bring a 21st Century focus to the regulation of pharmaceutical manufacturing and product quality by providing high quality, cost-effective oversight of industry manufacturing, processing and distribution.  FDA focuses on product quality standards and compliance by manufacturers with the GMP regulations to ensure that the highest possible quality products are marketed.  CDER ensures the latest technological advances are encouraged, including application of the requirements of Part 11 regulations. Further CDER efforts include:

Compliance Oversight of Marketed OTC Drugs

Enforcement of the OTC Drug Review regulations is tantamount to maintaining the integrity of the NDA process.  Those members of the regulated industry who market their OTC drugs in compliance with applicable monographs expect FDA to eliminate unfair competition from those who ignore monograph requirements.  Further, NDA holders for OTC drugs expect their investments to be protected by vigorous FDA enforcement against those who flaunt these NDA requirements.  This type of enforcement helps provide the consuming public with the assurance that they are buying safe and effective OTC drugs.

Pharmacy Compounding

FDA believes that a significant number of licensed pharmacies are engaged in manufacturing and distributing unapproved new drugs for human use in a manner that is outside the bounds of traditional pharmacy practice.  For example, some pharmacies make large quantities of unapproved drug products in advance of receiving a valid prescription for them, or copy commercially available drug products when there is no medical need for a compounded product.  Furthermore, some pharmacies have been found to compound drugs that are contaminated or that are dangerously subpotent or superpotent in a manner that can threaten public health.  In such situations, FDA may need to take enforcement action in accordance with the Act to protect the public health.   FDA continues to work with state regulatory authorities, providing support as needed for their regulation of pharmacy compounders. 

Import Compliance

FDA has worked with the Agency field import district offices and the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to develop categories of drug products targeted for "blitz" operations scheduled at different major mail import centers.These "blitz" operations are held cooperatively with CBP to identify the type and origin of drug products being offered for import into the U.S. through the mail, with emphasis placed on counterfeit, misbranded, adulterated, and restricted distribution drug products.  CDER also responds to inquiries concerning import and export regulations and enforcement policy from the regulated industry, consumers, consultants, and health care professionals. Other inquiries come from field import offices concerning importation of unapproved and investigational drug products, and drugs being imported in advance of application submission and final approval.

Research, Development, and Evaluation (RD&E) Activities

CDER's research efforts associated with manufacturing quality include:

Field Operations

ORA's field actions to ensure the safety and quality of the nation's drug supply include:

FDA Strategic Goal: Transforming FDA Business Operations, Systems, and Infrastructure to Support FDA's Mission in the 21st Century

Strong and sound science means Human Drug Program scientists stay on the cutting edge of new technologies. CDER's mission depends more than ever on a solid cadre of experienced physicians, toxicologists, chemists, statisticians, mathematicians, project managers and other highly qualified and dedicated professionals. 

Information Technology

FDA is working to apply information technology by developing and managing systems that provide staff with the technical tools to manage the review process and to provide the means to evaluate post-marking drug safety.

Selected FY 2005 Accomplishments

FDA Strategic Goal: Increasing Access to Innovative Products and Technologies to Improve Health

Risk management is at the core of CDER's mission.  Almost everything the center does in the review and approval of Human Drugs relates to weighing the benefits of a product to its risks.  CDER's FY 2005 accomplishments include new, generic, and OTC drugs as well as accomplishments of managing the risks of drugs in the pediatric population.

As the Agency Strategic Plan explains, "efficient risk management" requires using the best scientific data, developing quality standards, and using efficient systems and practices that provide clear and consistent decisions and communications for the American public and regulated industry.  Accomplishments toward objectives and strategies of the Agency Strategic Plan are included here as well.

Significant NDAs Approved in FY 2005

NDAs Approved under Accelerated Approval in FY 2005

Generic Drug Review

OGD continues to approve greater numbers of generic products thus helping to lower drug costs for millions of Americans.  The following are significant generic drugs approved in FY 2005 that will contribute to the goal and assure greater access to affordable health care:

Figure 1, ANDA Approvals[D]

 

The Office has demonstrated full support for the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR).   CDER has approved or tentatively approved 12 applications for a number of products.  More firms have expressed interest in submitting applications and have provided OGD with their projections for future applications.  CDER views the applications as priority for review and provides extensive guidance to the firms, who are often from the developing countries that will use the products.

As seen in Figures 1, there were 467 abbreviated new drug applications (ANDAs) approved or tentatively approved in FY 2005, an increase of 13 percent.  There was a median approval time of 16.3 months seen this year. 

 

 

 

Figure 1, ANDA ReceiptsThere was a staggering 36 percent increase in receipts in FY 2005 as shown in Figure 2.  This increase  is in addition to the 24 percent increase in receipts from FY 2002 to FY 2003 and an additional 25 percent increase from FY 2003 to FY 2004.  With the continuing high numbers of submissions, mechanisms are needed to increase efficiency.  An emphasis over FY 2005 is working to streamline the review process.  The third division of chemistry is nearly complete and is functioning effectively.    The chemistry and bioequivalence review divisions are relying more on the project manager staff to triage supplements and information requests so that only those that require particular scientific expertise are put into the reviewers' queue.  Groups of applications for single products are reviewed by a dedicated team in order to capitalize on the knowledge gained about the product.

OGD has developed a question based review (QbR) for its CMC evaluation that is focused on critical pharmaceutical quality attributes.  The goal is to transform the CMC review into a modern, science and risk-based pharmaceutical quality assessment under the FDA's cGMPs for the 21st Century Quality and PAT initiatives. With the move to the QbR, there is more emphasis on moving towards the common technical document (CTD) format for generic drug submissions since the QbR is more closely aligned with that format.  Firms are also encouraged to move to the electronic format of the CTD. 

Finally, to address the advent of electronic prescribing, electronic health records, and interest in the computerized distribution of up-to-date medication information FDA adopted Structured Product Labeling (SPL).  By selecting this format, FDA hopes to provide labeling that is both human and machine readable, faster to disseminate, and improves patient risk management.  It will also allow easier review when changes are made and greater accessibility by prescribers and consumers through the National Library of Medicine.

 

 

OTC Drug Products

In FY 2005, the OTC staff approved a total of 2 NDAs (Reviewed 6).  Significant approvals included:

Pediatric Drug Studies

Responding to Emergencies and Protecting Americans from Terrorism

CDER plays a key role in countering terrorism in the U.S., especially in preparing the country to have medical countermeasures readily available in the event of any chemical, biological, or radiological or nuclear attack.  In FY 2005, FDA approved several products for indications related to counter-terrorism:

In FY2005, FDA also performed the following counterterrorism tasks:

Information Technology

CDER accomplished several significant advances in applying information technology solutions to drug review processes:

FDA Strategic Goal: Enhancing Patient and Consumer Protection and Empowering Them with Better Information about Regulated Products

Patient and Consumer Protection

Drug Safety

Reforms Will Improve Oversight and Openness at FDA

February 2005:  HHS Secretary Mike Leavitt shared an emboldened vision for the FDA that included a new culture of openness, improved oversight and enhanced independence. In keeping with this vision, the FDA will create a new independent Drug Safety Oversight Board to oversee the management of drug safety issues, and will provide emerging information to doctors and patients about the risks and benefits of medicines.

"The public has spoken and they want more oversight and openness," Secretary Leavitt said during a meeting with FDA employees at the Parklawn Headquarters in Rockville, Md. "They want to know what we know, what we do with the information, and why we do it.  We will address their concerns by cultivating openness and enhanced independence."

 

Drug Safety Oversight Board

Better Communication to Consumers and other Stakeholders

Public Service CampaignsA picture of a person’s intestine and stomach are shown with a caption entitled, “Exceeding the Recommended Dosage Can Do More Than Wipe Out Your Pain – Just Ask Your Major Organs.”  This ad was co-produced by the United Health Foundation.

As a result of meeting and collaborating with various health-related businesses and educational organizations, FDA-developed materials were disseminated throughout the world. Below are a few examples:

Field Operations

ORA protected consumers from many sources of unsafe drugs, including:

FDA Strategic Goal: Improving Product Quality, Safety, And Availability Through Better Manufacturing And Product Oversight

Inspection and Enforcement Initiatives

Program staff played a key role in a major agency-wide initiative on "Pharmaceutical Current Good Manufacturing Practices (cGMPs) for the 21st Century: A Risk Based Approach," a two-year program that applies to pharmaceuticals, including biological human drugs and veterinary drugs.  FDA issued its final report on the cGMP initiative ( http://www.fda.gov/cder/gmp/gmp2004/GMP_finalreport2004.htm).  The report discusses:

FDA also took many other steps to enhance the consistency and coordination of its drug quality regulatory programs.  These accomplishments include:

FDA also took many other compliance and enforcement steps to protect the American public, including:

 Human Drugs
Program Activity Data (PAD)

PROGRAM WORKLOAD AND OUTPUTS

FY 2005 Actual

FY2006 Estimate

FY 2007 Estimate

New Drug Review

Priority New Drug Application (NDA/BLA) Reviews

41

30

30

Standard NDA/BLA Reviews

141

165

165

Priority NDA/BLAs Approved

27

16

16

Standard NDA/BLAs Approved

82

72

72

Time from Receipt to Approval (mo.s)(mean)-Priority NDA/BLAs

10.1

(8.5)

(8.5)

Time from Receipt to Approval (mo.s)(mean)-Standard NDA/BLAs

20.6

(18.0)

(18.0)

Time from Receipt to Approval (mo.s)(median)-Priority NDA/BLAs

6.0

(6.0)

(6.0)

Time from Receipt to Approval (mo.s)(median)-Standard NDA/BLAs

12.9

(13.5)

(13.5)

NDA Supplemental Reviews (NDAs only)

2,793

3,300

3,300

INDs (Active) (Drugs and Biologics-Commercial+Research)

13106

13,000

13,000

Clinical Pharmacology/BioPharmaceutic Reviews

1,875

1,600

1,600

Biologic Therapeutics Review

Total Original License Application (PLA/ELA/BLA) Reviews

3

7

7

PLA/BLA Approvals

3

5

5

License Supplement (PLA/ELA/BLA) Reviews

318

220

220

Commercial IND/IDE Receipts (Biologics Only)

68

80

80

IND/IDE Amendments Receipts
(Biologics Only)

9,772

8,800

8,800

Generic Drug Review

Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) Actions

1496

1,553

1612

ANDA Approval Actions (both Tentative and Full Approvals)

467

450

470

Average Review Time from ANDA Receipt to Approval (median in months)

16.3

16.9

17.5

ANDA Supplemental Actions (Labeling and Manufacturing)

4,566

5,406

5,610

Over-the-Counter Drug Review

OTC Monographs Under Development

17

25

20

OTC Final Monographs Published

8

5

5

Best Pharmaceuticals for Children Act

Approved Labels with New Pediatric Information

16

22

22

Patient Safety

Adverse Reactions Reports

462,284

508,512

559,364

Percentage of Adverse Drug Reaction Reports Submitted Electronically (% of total)

29%

36%

40%

Percentage of Serious/Unexpected Adverse Drug Reaction Reports Submitted Electronically

51%

66%

75%

Drug Quality Reporting System Report

2,933

3,400

3,500

 

DRUGS FIELD PROGRAM OUTPUTS- DOMESTIC INSPECTIONS

FY 2005 Estimate

FY 2006 Estimate

FY 2007 Estimate

Pre-Approval Inspections (NDA)

149

130

130

Pre-Approval Inspections (ANDA)

81

135

135

Bioresearch Monitoring Program Inspections

562

520

520

Drug Processing (GMP) Program Inspections

1,365

1,500

1,440

Compressed Medical Gas Manufacturers Inspections

125

155

150

Adverse Drug Events Project Inspections

106

135

135

OTC Monograph Project Inspections and

11

Health Fraud Project Inspections 1

53

45

45

State Partnership Inspections: Compressed Medical Gas Manufacturers Inspections

85

110

110

State Partnership Inspections: GMP Inspections

57

50

50

Total FDA and State Partnership Inspections

2,594

2,780

2,715

Total Domestic Reinspections (Non-add)

220

220

220

Domestic Laboratory Samples Analyzed

1,446

1,735

1,600

PROGRAM OUTPUTS-IMPORT/FOREIGN INSPECTIONS

Foreign Pre-Approval Inspections (NDA)

163

180

180

Foreign Pre-Approval Inspections (ANDA)

77

60

60

Foreign Bioresearch Monitoring Program Inspections

85

65

65

Foreign Drug Processing (GMP) Program Inspections

217

195

195

Foreign Adverse Drug Events Project Inspections

10

25

25

Total Foreign FDA Inspections

552

525

525

Total Foreign Reinspections (Non-add)

17

17

17

Import Field Exams/Tests

4,288

4,400

4,400

Import Laboratory Samples Analyzed

1,045

355

300

Import Physical Exam Subtotal

4,850

4,850

4,700

Import Lines

264,559

317,471

380,965

Percent of Import Lines Physically Examined

1.83%

1.53%

1.23%

Note:
1.  The OTC Monograph and Health Fraud Inspections will no longer be planned separately in FY 2006.

 


Office of Orphan Products Development

1/Includes a 1 percent rescission. 

2/The Office of Orphan Products Development is shown for illustrative purposes and is not contained as a separate line item in the All Purpose Tables. 

3/The Grants piece is part of the aggregate amount of budget authority contained in the CDER budget line item of the All Purpose Tables. 

4/The Program Administration piece is part of the aggregate amount of budget authority contained in the Other Activities budget line item of the All Purpose Tables. 

FY 2005 Actual