|
1
|
- RAPS
- Baltimore, MD
- 10/20/2003
- Steven Galson, M.D., M.P.H.
- Acting Director
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research
- Food and Drug Administration
|
|
2
|
- Hot Topics in CDER
- FDA’s GMP Initiative
- CDER’s Pediatric Therapeutics Program
|
|
3
|
- Leadership changes
- Consolidation with former CBER staff
- Incorporation of best practices
- Commissioner’s Innovation Initiative
- PDUFA III implementation
- FDA Strategic Plan
- Addressing challenges of FY 2004 budget
|
|
4
|
- Dr. Janet Woodcock to Office of Commissioner
- Cross-cutting projects
- GMP
- Pharmacogenomics
- Quality systems
- Coordination with NIH on harmonized clinical data and adverse event
standards
- Scientific challenges of generic biologics
- Dr. Mark Goldberger, Acting Deputy Director
|
|
5
|
- Consolidation with former CBER staff
- Incorporation of best practices
- Commissioner’s Innovation Initiative
- PDUFA III implementation
- FDA Strategic Plan
- Addressing challenges of FY 2004 budget
|
|
6
|
- Merger of Biotech Programs
- Increase of 208 FTEs
- Increase in CDER's biotech program - adding monoclonal antibodies for
therapy and diagnosis; thrombolytics; cytokines; growth factors; and
immunomodulators
- Expands CDER's laboratory research programs
- Includes 54 approved products and approximately 1500 INDs
- Focus on Best Practices
|
|
7
|
- New Structures to address biotech therapeutic program
- New Office of Drug Evaluation VI with 3 divisions
- New Office of Biotechnology Products with 2 laboratory-based review
divisions
- Compliance: new Therapeutic Facilities Review Branch
- Safety: a new section for statistical support for biologic products
|
|
8
|
- Consolidation with former CBER staff
- Incorporation of best practices
- Commissioner’s Innovation Initiative
- PDUFA III implementation
- FDA Strategic Plan
- Addressing challenges of FY 2004 budget
|
|
9
|
- Response to falling NME application rates observed world-wide (not
unique to FDA)
- Overall goal: help
streamline/facilitate drug development (NOT shorten review times)
- Root cause analysis – multiple cycles
- Additional guidances – e.g. pharmacogenomics
- Quality systems principles in review process
|
|
10
|
- Guidance on filing PG data to INDs and NDAs
- Work with CDRH on co-development of PG tests and investigational drugs
- Formation of cross-disciplinary review group
- Work on standardization
|
|
11
|
- Say what you do
- Do what you say
- Prove it
- Improve it
|
|
12
|
- Dr. Harry Hertz (Baldridge Award):
- “You don’t have to be bad to improve”
- “It’s all about results”
|
|
13
|
- Assume organization purpose/goal is to meet/exceed customers
needs/expectations
- Two (maybe three) kinds of customers
- Internal – you
- External – public, prescribers, patients, congress, administration,
etc.
- Industry = “constrained customer”
|
|
14
|
- Once clear on expectations – assess how processes & work is
addressing &
- if needed
- Set up metrics for results
- Audit
- Continue to improve
|
|
15
|
- Lecture series through Fall – telecast across FDA
- Working group (under product quality initiative) expect to produce a
draft framework by Halloween
- Training course for PDUFA managers being set up
|
|
16
|
- Consolidation with former CBER staff
- Incorporation of best practices
- Commissioner’s Innovation Initiative
- PDUFA III implementation
- FDA Strategic Plan
- Addressing challenges of FY 2004 budget
|
|
17
|
- CMA and GRMP Guidances
- Performance improvement contracts
- Prospective “root cause analysis”
- Quality systems
- Postmarket Guidances
- IT funding/projects run by CIO’s office
|
|
18
|
- Finalize this Fall
- Training for all review staff in October
- Details on email
- 5 ½ day sessions
- Aim for consistent implementation
|
|
19
|
- Consolidation with former CBER staff
- Incorporation of best practices
- Commissioner’s Innovation Initiative
- PDUFA III implementation
- FDA Strategic Plan
- Addressing challenges of FY 2004 budget
|
|
20
|
|
|
21
|
- Efficient, Science Based Risk Management
- Patient and Consumer Safety
- Better Informed Consumers
- Counterterrorism
- A Strong FDA
|
|
22
|
- Apply most current scientific knowledge about risk management and
quality assurance
- Pharmaceutical cGMP Initiative
- Prevent additional review cycles when possible and develop guidances on
innovative and cross-cutting product development:
- Oncology
- Diabetes
- Pharmacogenomics
- Provide high quality, cost-effective oversight of industry
manufacturing, processing and distribution to reduce risk
|
|
23
|
- Provide new important information on pediatric labeling to advocacy
groups and health care provides
- Draft guidance on brief summary for direct-to-consumer advertising
- Better communicate risks of imported prescription drugs
- Continue Generic Drug Education
- Educate public and health care providers about antimicrobial resistance
- Establish joint campaign with CDC
|
|
24
|
- Work with Industry to improve quality of adverse event information
- Possibly revise MedWatch data collection methods or form
- Develop guidance
- Develop analytical techniques to better understand the sources and
degree of product-related risks
- Develop staff expertise to enhance ability to analyze risks
- Develop reviewer guidance for post-marketing data analysis
- Enhance design/use of in-house databases to better identify risks
- Use of population-based databases to better analyze risks
- Establish a partnership to collect data on medication errors
- Access databases to complement current available databases
|
|
25
|
- Assess the regulatory status of high priority medical countermeasures
- Identify what additional countermeasures need to be developed
- Support appropriate labeling changes for counter terrorism indications
- Identify medical countermeasure inventories and address potential
shortages
- Identify patterns that indicate a need for increased scrutiny for
certain manufacturers, sites and/or products
|
|
26
|
- Most actions are led by Office of the Commissioner
- Implement Shared Services
- Seeking improved Personnel software (e.g., QuickHire/QuickClass)
- Improve Agency Financial Management Systems
- Execute plans for White Oak
|
|
27
|
- Over 300 action items total
- CDER leading over 70 actions
- Action Plan Monitoring
- Periodic status updates to Agency Management
|
|
28
|
- Consolidation with former CBER staff
- Incorporation of best practices
- Commissioner’s Innovation Initiative
- PDUFA III implementation
- FDA Strategic Plan
- Addressing challenges of FY 2004 budget
|
|
29
|
- Appropriations Committee Markups (House and Senate) completed
- FDA received an unprecedented
- $60M cut to base funding
- $25.7M Management savings
- $29M IT savings
- 0.6M Homeland Security Transfer
and others
|
|
30
|
- So What does this mean?
- Very very lean year
- Targeted increases will not offset losses and yet better performance
will be expected
- Don’t foresee personnel growth in ’04
|
|
31
|
- Administrative Changes: President’s Management Agenda
- Government-wide Initiatives
- Strategic Management of Human Capital
- Competitive Sourcing
|
|
32
|
- Administrative Personnel Reduction
- Administrative Consolidation
- A-76 Process
|
|
33
|
- Rationale for budget cuts:
savings from head count reduction in management/administrative
area
- 7 1/2% Reduction in defined
series in ’04
- 7 1/2% Reduction in ’05
|
|
34
|
- Shared Services (FDA)
- IT Infrastructure Shared Services
- Administrative shared Services:
EEO, Real Property, Travel, Contracts/purchasing, Financial
- Personnel (HHS, pending Congressional agreement)
- Hiring
- Classification
- Promotions
|
|
35
|
- Exciting, ambitious plans for coming year
- Improving and modernizing review process
- Addressing how FDA can foster/promote innovation in drug development
- Enhanced focus on special problems (counter-terrorism and pediatrics)
- Improved methodology for risk management
|