Table of Contents
Evaluation of Written Prescription Information Provided in Community Pharmacies: A National Study
Objectives
Study Differs From Past Work
Eight Criteria from 1996 Action Plan for Useful Information
Eight Criteria from 1996 Action Plan for Useful Information
Expert Rating Forms
Five Levels of Adherence to Criteria
Consumer Rating Process
Comprehensibility Items
Legibility and Summary Items
% Shoppers Given Leaflet and Mean Expert Rating of Leaflet
Expert Ratings, All Criteria (n=1,367 leaflets)
Expert Ratings by Criterion
% Leaflets Rated Level 4-5
Lowest Expert Ratings - Criteria 2 & 4
Lowest Expert Ratings - Criterion 8
Consumer Ratings, All Items (%)
Consumer Ratings by Item
Consumer Summary Rating: Readability and Understandability
Consumer Summary Rating: Usefulness
Factors Linked to Ratings (atenolol)
Expert Ratings by Leaflet Type, Vendor, and Version
Expert Ratings of Standard Leaflets: Vendor 1 Vs. Vendor 2 (atenolol)
Expert Ratings of Standard Leaflets: Vendor 1 Vs. Vendor 2 (atenolol)
Consumer Ratings by Leaflet Type, Vendor, Version (atenolol)
Consumer Ratings of Standard Leaflets: Vendor 1 Vs Vendor 2 (atenolol)
Consumer Overall Ratings by Leaflet Format
Leaflet Distribution and Ratings by Pharmacy Type
Leaflet Type by Pharmacy Type
Conclusions: Four Main Problems Identified
|
Author: Bonnie L. Svarstad
Home Page: http://www.fda.gov/cder/Offices/ODS/writtenPrescripInfo.htm
Download presentation source
|