![]()
| This article was published in FDA Consumer magazine several years ago. It is no longer being maintained and may contain information that is out of date. You may find more current information on this topic in more recent issues of FDA Consumer or elsewhere on the FDA Website, by checking the site index or home page, or by searching the site. |
FDA in the Global Village by Rebecca D. Williams Charles A. Wayne, an FDA drug specialist, stands center court as the agency's premier globe-trotter. Toting a leather satchel with "FDA" engraved on one side, Wayne has travelled to almost every country in the world to inspect foreign drug manufacturers, logging more miles in his 44-year career than any other FDA investigator. This year he has already traveled to South America and Europe, and now awaits his next assignment. "I'll go wherever they send me," he says. Few FDA employees travel as part of their jobs, and fewer still travel as often as Wayne, but a certain group of investigators, scientists and administrators carry the agency's work outside our nation's borders. They may conduct inspections in the rugged mountains of Peru, contact health officials in Japan by fax and phone, or engage in regulatory-related activities in remote corners of the globe. Next year, FDA plans to triple its inspections overseas and significantly increase other contacts with foreign governments. "We have worked with every country in the world over the years in some fashion, even if it's just to give information," says Walter Batts, director of FDA's International Affairs Staff, which coordinates much of the agency's work with foreign governments. FDA's international activities involve three main goals: to ensure that imported products are safe and effective, to offer foreign countries technical assistance in product regulation, and to work toward unifying standards around the world for food, drugs and medical devices. Inspecting Foreign Manufacturers FDA has conducted foreign inspections for more than 30 years. In the late 1950s, FDA inspected only firms that produced antibiotics made overseas, but it has since added inspections of food, drug and medical device companies to make sure their products are safe for American consumers. Inspecting these abroad, however, is much different than in the United States. Because foreign travel requires careful advance planning, FDA can't drop in unexpectedly to inspect foreign manufacturers. It also cannot seize goods and prosecute offenders overseas because the agency has no judicial leverage over foreign manufacturers. So, to monitor imports, FDA uses "the back door approach," says Richard Klug, who supervises international inspections in FDA's Office of Regulatory Affairs. Before any drugs or medical devices from abroad can be sold in the United States, they must earn FDA approval and their manufacturers must pass FDA inspection. Foreign companies that want to sell their products in the United States usually welcome FDA investigators, Klug says. "Generally, I think they respect FDA in foreign countries," says Klug. "We are very well received." Overseas inspections are the responsibility of FDA's "international cadre," a team of about 80 investigators and 15 experts from among the agency's regular investigators. Like Charles Wayne, they travel overseas weeks, sometimes months, each year. Several international investigators speak foreign languages, but most speak English or use interpreters when they travel. That's why in addition to technical proficiency, cadre investigators must practice tact and patience. "When they go overseas, they're representing the United States, not just FDA," Klug says. "It's a select group." The international cadre often returns with harrowing tales. John Rubright, an investigator from Philadelphia, for example, made his first overseas inspection last February. He landed in Tokyo's airport in the middle of a snowstorm, only to endure an earthquake just hours later at his hotel. "I was horrified," Rubright remembers. "The Japanese said I should feel very lucky to have experienced both a snowstorm and an earthquake in one day, but I was pretty scared." Although most trips are not as eventful as Rubright's, some international investigations have been dangerous, even tragic. In 1990, during an investigation of the Chilean grape industry, John Harty Jr., director of FDA's International Affairs Staff, and Patrick Pouzar, director of investigations in FDA's Nashville district office, died when their small plane crashed in the Andes Mountains. At a memorial service honoring Harty and Pouzar, the two were awarded the Secretary's Recognition Award "for stalwart, stellar service to all of mankind." In their memories, then-acting FDA Commissioner James Benson announced the establishment by FDA of an international education program to improve public health protection in Latin America and the Caribbean. Help to Countries in Need In addition to conducting foreign inspections, FDA lends technical assistance to many countries that need scientific advice or training. For three years, FDA consumer safety officer Edwin Rivera-Martinez practically lived out of his suitcase, traveling around Latin America to train officials of those countries in proper drug manufacturing practices, quality control, and inspection techniques. With funding from the Pan American Health Organization, Rivera-Martinez, then stationed in FDA's San Juan district, helped set up five month-long training courses in Guatemala, Colombia, Costa Rica, Brazil, and Equador for nearly 250 officials. The students then used their training to teach others what they'd learned. "I think the project had a dramatic impact," Rivera-Martinez said. "Whenever an FDAer goes abroad, his or her presence is perceived in a positive way." The agency has also traveled overseas in times of emergency. In the past year, FDA has given advice on food safety to South American countries hit by a cholera epidemic. An FDA official traveled to Russia to review vaccine-making capabilities in light of that country's recent political upheaval. And the agency has worked with Egypt and Saudi Arabia to help them establish better quality control methods in vaccine manufacturing. "By and large, we will work with all countries except those in which there are government restrictions, such as Iraq or Libya," says Batts. "However, we evaluate requests carefully to weigh the impact on FDA resources against the contribution to our mission and U.S. government policies." FDA officials have traveled to Cuba, for instance, to work on medical device regulations. They have gone to Taiwan, a country not officially recognized by the United States, and to India and Thailand, even though relationships with those countries are strained by disagreements over copyright and patent laws. In 1991, FDA brought 600 foreign visitors to the United States, from high-level health officials eager to talk about FDA policy to laboratory technicians who needed hands-on training. By way of a computerized communications link through the Department of State and regular mailings to embassies and foreign health officials, FDA also informs and receives information from other countries about recalls, new policies and regulations, and health hazards. International Harmonization Inspections and technical assistance are not FDA's only international concerns, however. The agency is also working to establish standard regulations worldwide for products it regulates. Among negotiators, this effort is called "international harmonization." Regulations governing food, drugs and medical devices now vary widely among countries. International harmonization may speed new drug and medical device approvals, help FDA use its resources more efficiently, and ease trade restrictions between nations. For example, FDA has agreements with some countries to exchange data from drug testing so that scientists don't have to duplicate efforts. Recently, the United States and Canada worked together to evaluate DDI, a drug to combat the AIDS virus. Both countries approved the drug in record time and on the same date. FDA is negotiating especially with Japan and the European Community to harmonize drug testing requirements, since 90 percent of drugs come from those countries and the United States. FDA employees also participate in international conferences sponsored by the World Health Organization, and in a number of international trade negotiations. "It's important for us to be involved in the trade talks to make sure FDA's mandate isn't compromised," says Batts, FDA's primary negotiator at the North American Free Trade Agreement talks between Canada, Mexico, and the United States. FDA welcomes the opportunity to participate in trade negotiations. However, it doesn't intend to relax standards on the products it regulates to improve trade at the expense of public health. "Clearly," Batts adds, "FDA's mandate is to protect the public health from unsafe, ineffective, or poor-quality products." Future International Affairs The future of FDA's international activities, particularly concerning international harmonization, is currently under study by an agency task force. Although the task force's recommendations were not complete when this article went to press, proposals to improve FDA's monitoring of the increasing amount of imported food, drugs and medical devices will likely be among them. The agency's international affairs staff has increased from two people only handling foreign visitors in the late 1970s to a staff of 16 today. Some industry groups have suggested that FDA station employees in Europe and Mexico to coordinate regulatory issues and technical cooperation overseas. In any event, the task of harmonizing international regulations, says Batts, will give lasting benefits to FDA and the American public. "[With harmonization], we can make better use of information from other countries, approve products faster, and regulate imports more effectively," Batts says. "In the future, FDA is going to be much more involved in activities with other countries and international organizations." Rebecca D. Williams is a staff writer for FDA Consumer.<