Medical Devices
Objectives for Public Workshop - Cardiovascular Metallic Implants: Corrosion, Surface Characterization, and Nickel Leaching, March 8-9, 2012
Workshop Objective:
To provide a forum for the discussion of:
- The various methods that are used for corrosion assessments, surface characterization techniques, and nickel leach testing used to evaluate the suitability of metallic cardiovascular implant devices.
- The limitations of each of these tests to predict actual in-vivo performance.
- The need, utility, and circumstances when each test is needed
- The potential testing paradigms, including what should be used as acceptance criteria for each test.
Session Objectives:
- Purpose of Testing (intro)
- Identify what testing has been done before
- What has been learned from previous testing
- Utility and limitations of testing
- Moving forward (testing considerations, knowledge gaps)
Schedule:
Day 1
- Intro 15 min
- 4-4.5 hr corrosion
- 2.0 hr surface characterization
Day 2
- 4 hr nickel leach/tox
- 3 hr summary
Session 1 – Corrosion (4-4.5hrs)
Objectives:
- Identify the types of corrosion testing commonly performed. (15 min max including intro)
- Identify what has been learned from previous corrosion testing; describe the relevance of corrosion testing. (60 min)
- 2.1. Discuss whether corrosion testing has been predictive of in vivo corrosion (from animal studies or patient explants)
- 2.2. Identify the in vivo driving forces for corrosion
- Discuss interpretation of results and proposed acceptance criteria for ASTM F2129. (75min)
- 3.1. Discuss interpretation of Er values
- 3.2. Discuss value of Eb-Er vs Eb as acceptance criteria.
- 3.3. Discuss whether specific Eb or Eb-Er values are universally appropriate.
- 3.4. Discuss the significance of repassivation potential
- 3.5. Discuss any other corrosion testing concerns
- Moving Forward: Discuss how corrosion should be assessed moving forward. (90 min)
- 4.1. Discuss whether ASTM F2129 is a sufficient assessment of clinically relevant corrosion.
- 4.1.1. If not:
- 4.1.1.1. Discuss whether it is possible to modify F2129 to be more clinically relevant (e.g. acceptance criteria)
- 4.1.1.2. Discuss what is a sufficient assessment of clinically relevant corrosion.
- 4.1.1. If not:
- 4.2. Discuss the utility of galvanic corrosion testing.
- 4.3. Potential modifications to current testing methodologies and assessments.
- 4.3.1. Identify best practices for F2129 testing
- 4.3.2. Identify best practices for galvanic corrosion testing
- 4.1. Discuss whether ASTM F2129 is a sufficient assessment of clinically relevant corrosion.
Session 2 – Surface Characterization of Nickel-Containing Alloys (2.0hrs)
Objectives:
- Identify commonly used methods to characterize the surface (passivation) layer of metal implant materials. Describe the respective benefits and drawback of each of current surface characterization techniques/methodologies, based on your experience as well as theoretical/practical considerations. (30 min)
- Discuss the relevance of surface characterization (30 min)
- 2.1. Discuss potential structure-property relationships for each alloy.
- 2.2. Identify key surface characteristics for each alloy:
- Moving Forward: Discuss potential implications for surface characterization (60 min)
- 3.1. Discuss whether surface characterization testing is needed in general
- 3.1.1. If not, discuss when it is needed (e.g. “poor” ASTM F2129 test results, fractures)
- 3.1.2. Discuss whether surface characterization testing can be used to obviate the need for other tests, and if so which ones and under what conditions.
- 3.2. Discuss whether acceptance criteria for surface chemistry and depth characteristics can or should be established for Auger, XPS, and FIB-SEM.
- 3.3. Discuss the potential benefits to perform surface microstructure quality control on final devices.
Session 3 – Nickel Leach and Toxicity (4hrs)
Objectives:
- Discuss the consequences of nickel exposure (60 min)
- 1.1. Discuss the general biological response to/toxicity of nickel
- 1.2. Discuss clinical findings related to nickel tox
- Discuss in vitro nickel leach testing (60 min)
- 2.1. Discuss what has been learned from in vitro nickel leach testing
- 2.2. Discuss the limitations of in vitro testing
- 2.3. Discuss best practices for in vitro nickel leach testing
- Discuss in vivo nickel release assessment (30 min)
- 3.1. Identify animal and clinical approaches to evaluate nickel release.
- 3.2. Discuss what has been learned from in vivo nickel leach testing
- 3.3. Discuss the limitations of in vivo nickel assessment
- Discuss in vitro – in vivo correlation of nickel release and patient exposure (30 min)
- Discuss acceptable levels of nickel exposure (30 min)
- Moving Forward: Identify knowledge gaps (30 min)
Session 4 – Testing Paradigm (3hrs)
Objective: Identify testing paradigms
Guiding Questions:
- Corrosion testing:
- Currently, ASTM F2129 is generally needed to assess pitting/crevice corrosion.
- Is ASTM F2129 a sufficient assessment of clinically relevant corrosion?
- If not,
- Is there a way to modify F2129 to be more clinically relevant (e.g. acceptance criteria)
- Are there other assessments in lieu of or in addition to ASTM F2129 to assess clinically relevant corrosion? a)
- Under what conditions is galvanic corrosion (ASTM G71) needed?
- If ASTM F2129 results are “good” is galvanic corrosion testing needed?
- Currently, ASTM F2129 is generally needed to assess pitting/crevice corrosion.
- Surface characterization:
- Is surface characterization testing needed in general?
- If not, when is it needed? (e.g. “poor” ASTM F2129 test results, fractures)
- Can surface characterization testing be used to obviate the need for other tests, and if so which ones and under what conditions?
- Nickel leach
- Under what conditions is in vitro nickel leach testing needed (e.g. “poor” ASTM F2129 test results, fractures, “poor” surface characteristics)?
- Should open circuit potential be performed in tandem with in vitro nickel leach testing?
- Under what conditions is in vivo nickel leach testing needed?
- Under what conditions is in vitro nickel leach testing needed (e.g. “poor” ASTM F2129 test results, fractures, “poor” surface characteristics)?
Potential Tests for consideration:
Pitting/crevice corrosion (ASTM F2129)
Galvanic corrosion
Surface characterization
Animal testing
Ni leach (in vitro and/or in vivo)
Open circuit potential
(fretting/fatigue)







