Archived Content

The content on this page is provided for reference purposes only. This content has not been altered or updated since it was archived.

Medical Devices

Medical Device Use in the Home Environment Guidance Workshop, May 24, 2010 - Breakout Session Notes: Human Factors


  • When the user is other than the user
  • How much training
    • Mfg?
    • Interactive process
  • What does training need to look like
    • Pictures
    • Large font


  • Identify appropriate patient population
    • Dexterity –
    • User’s physical abilities
  • Is device disability friendly?

Breakout Groups

  • List barriers that family caregivers will face
  • Sources of training
  • What does training look like?
  • Identify user groups

Group 1 – Barriers Family Caregivers will face

  • Mental strength
  • Ability to multi-task
  • Physical ability of patient
    • Disability, eyesight, hearing
  • Language and comprehension
  • Environment – physically, electrically, animals
  • Patients overall knowledge of own disease process
  • Support system – multiple care, none, one, etc. family?
  • Transportation and portability concerns (daycare to dialysis)
  • Adaptation
  • Financial/insurance burdens
  • Overwhelmed by technology
  • Delivery model coordination
    • Between patient, user, home health agency, etc for cohesive delivery

Group 2 – Sources of training

  • Training material comes from mfg
    • Sales forces – trains healthcare professional (nurse)
    • Nurse trains family or healthcare professional
    • Family then trains another family member or patients
    • Sales force to patient
  • Materials
    • Customer service line
    • Chat online
    • Video/audio over internet
  • Inability to determine “who” receives and/or uses device
  • Concern – how should non-medical professional labeling be developed?
    • Can’t necessarily be developed in a way that is useful to the user

Group 3 – What does training look like?

  • Four vectors
  • Nature of device
    • Cognitively complex
    • Manually complex
  • Delivery of care – where? Care setting?
    • Institution
    • In-transit
    • Home
  • Nature of User

More on what user training would look like…..

  • Training itself – type of delivery
    • Self-directed
      • Set of instructions – static on paper or on screen (IFUs – artwork, AEDs – on device training – intensely self-directed
      • Web-based
      • Interactive – practice kit or…….?
    • Facilitated
      • Single instance training
      • Multiple Session Training – at institution, follow-up at home, etc.

Group 4 – Who is the user?

  • Division between actual patient and caregiver
  • Caregiver – can be in flux (ex. - child – change from parent to teacher…even within family)
    • Family member
    • From outside to help
  • Range of ages, education, nationalities, language, tech literacy, literary literacy
  • In stressful situations
  • Direct emotional relationship with patient (different from docs) – may influence how the approach care
  • Not trained as “problem solvers” – not triage nurses – people who are faced with certain amt of info and have to figure out what to do.

General Comments

  • Certain devices need to be active to determine if patient can really use device – with some devices, that could present a risk – how should validation studies be approached?
  • Consideration of who the users groups earlier in the design phase – iterative process of interactions with user groups
  • Understand better how devices will be segmented as initial point of contact and how training will be conducted when devices is used between many (for example, breast pump)
  • When does iPhone become medical device?
  • Consider thinking about multiple degrees/classes of home use medical devices – also consider level of training – could be different
  • Method of training –so many different paths for the way the devices gets into the users hand – labeling can be missing
  • Don’t have all of the partners-need to have them all in the room
    • Homecare agencies
    • Home medical equipment orgs
    • Pharmacies
    • Hospice Agencies
    • Insurance companies
    • CMS?
  • Labeling/Mfg
    • FDA guidance on specificity
    • Industry willing to help with developing classifications/degress of home use devices
  • Need to be mindful of the cost
  • Sometimes there is a direct line from mfg to user (“neophyte”)
  • Reimbursement
    • More we cut, harder to provide services such as value addded services
    • CMS and FDA need to be on same page
  • Training
    • Have to assume that no one gets more than ½ of what is taught
    • Important that materials that go home are useful and something that user can refer to
  • Can mfg separate what is required for user and clinically?
    • Have risk management, clinical instructions
    • Have quick start guide – critical steps included
  • FDA device classification – need to use easy words for user, but required to use language that is designed for physician – want to use “plain and simple language”
  • Social Media – How can you leverage the user base from collective experience and learning – and how can mfg use this information – how do you enable access to that kind of information with industry participation?
  • Older Devices existing in the field-
    • Some were never designed to be used in the home
    • What needs to be done to bring up older/existing devices up to a safer bar?
    • Who is responsible for that?
  • Differentiating between devices intended for at home monitoring versus those producing active therapy

Summary – Human Factors Discussion

Four Questions Presented to Group

  • When the user is other than the patient
  • Sources of Training
  • What does training need to look like
  • Barriers to Training

Page Last Updated: 04/15/2014
Note: If you need help accessing information in different file formats, see Instructions for Downloading Viewers and Players.
Language Assistance Available: Español | 繁體中文 | Tiếng Việt | 한국어 | Tagalog | Русский | العربية | Kreyòl Ayisyen | Français | Polski | Português | Italiano | Deutsch | 日本語 | فارسی | English