-

Medical Devices

  • Share Share this page

CLIA Complexity Process

FDA’s CLIA Complexity Process Clara A. Sliva, MT(ASCP), MPA Acting CLIA Coordinator FDA
IVD Roundtable 510(k) Workshop - April 23, 2002

Expected Outcomes

  • What is CLIA ’88
  • Key Features
  • Who are the players
  • FDA and CLIA
  • CLIA regulations
  • What is categorization
  • What requires categorization
  • What is not regulated under CLIA
  • How FDA categorizes tests
    -CDRH
    -CBER
  • "Automatic" categorizations
  • Specific requests for categorizations
  • Categorization notifications: letter, internet
  • Where do you go for help

 

What is CLIA

  • Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 (CLIA)
  • Enacted as result of reports of inaccurate test results from Pap smears
  • Questions were raised about how labs functioned and what quality control procedures existed
  • Comprehensive plan to improve the quality of labs
  • 1987 = 12,000/200,000 labs regulated
  • 2002 = 170,000 labs

Who are the Players

  • Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (formerly HCFA) oversees CLIA
  • CLIA self-funded
  • User fees from regulated labs
  • CMS pays FDA for CLIA categorization commercially marketed tests
  • CDC categorizes lab procedures
    --Provider performed microscopy
    --Gram stain

DCLD’s Players

  • Lisa King
  • Renita Hoard
  • Dr. Joe Hackett
  • Dr. Steve Gutman
  • CLIA team represents all Branches

Key Features

  • Standards based on complexity of testing, NOT lab site
  • How complex it is for the analyst to run the test
    -e.g. training, knowledge, interpretation

FDA and CLIA

  • 1992 CLIA regulations
  • FDA responsible for complexity categorization
  • 1993-94 FDA categorized >900 tests
  • 1994 CDC delegated responsibility
  • Resources, funding issues
  • Impetus for change
  • Manufacturers
  • Congress
  • "Confusion and duplication of effort"
  • CDC, HCFA, FDA consensus
  • Interagency agreement 2/27/99
  • HCFA, CDC, FDA = CLIA partners

What Regulations Govern Categorization

  • 42 CFR 493.17, categorization of specific laboratory tests by level of complexity
  • Moderate, high
  • 7 Criteria

Moderate, High

42 CFR 493.17

  • Knowledge
  • Training and experience
  • Characteristics of operational Steps
  • Calibration, QC, PT materials
  • Troubleshooting, Maintenance
  • Interpretation and judgment
  • 7 criteria scored as 1, 2, or 3
  • Score of 1 = minimum
  • Score of 3 = specialized
  • Total scores of 12 or < = moderate
  • 13 or > = high
  • e.g. PCR = high complexity

Categorization Regulations

  • 42 CFR 493.15 (c) 9 generic tests
  • Categorized by regulation
  • Automatically waived
  • But still requires review and notification from FDA
  • Requires posting categorization on website

Generic 9

493.15 (c)

  • dipstick and tablet reagent urinalysis
  • fecal occult blood
  • ovulation tests
  • urine pregnancy tests
  • erythrocyte sedimentation rate
  • hemoglobin (copper sulfate)
  • blood glucose devices (FDA-cleared for OTC use)
  • spun microhematocrit
  • hemoglobin single analyte instruments (1993)

 

Most Common Waived Tests

  • Urine pregnancy - 34%
  • All other tests - 20%
  • Blood glucose (OTC) - 18%
  • Urine dipstick/tablet chemistries-19%
  • Ovulation tests - 5%
  • Fecal occult blood - 4%

Categorization Regulations

  • CMS and PHS Sept 13, 1995 Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
  • Clarified statutory criteria for obtaining waiver
  • Guidelines list the criteria
  • Final rule pending

CMS/PHS Waiver Criteria

  • Defined simplicity, low risk
  • Defined accuracy as comparison to reference materials, methods
  • Precision field studies in hands of lay user
  • Studies distinct from FDA premarket review

Categorization Regulations

  • Food and Drug Modernization Act Nov. 21, 1997
  • Clarifies OTC tests automatically waived.
  • But still requires categorization notification letter from FDA
  • Requires posting categorization on website

OTC

  • Growing number OTC tests
    -drugs of abuse
    -cholesterol
    -vaginal ph
    -microalbumin
    -follicle stimulating hormone

Prescription Home Use

  • Prescription home use is an Rx device physician instructs patient to use in home
  • FDA devices are OTC or Rx
  • Any device used in the home that is not OTC
  • Examples - prothrombin time, hemoglobin A1c

What is Categorization

  • Process of assigning new commercially marketed tests to one of 3 CLIA categories: waived, moderate, high
  • The key to understanding categorization; the analyst/operator and the complexity of testing

What Requires Categorization

  • Categorization applies to all laboratory test systems on materials derived from the human body conducted for the purpose of diagnosis, prevention or treatment, or assessment of the health
  • Plain Language:
  • Commercially marketed tests produce a result

Not Categorized

Produce no test result

  • Quality Control
  • Calibrators
  • Collection kits
    --drugs of abuse
    --hepatitis C

Not currently regulated under CLIA

  • Non-invasive (laser hematocrit)
  • Breath tests (h. pylori, alcohol)
  • Drugs of abuse - Workplace
  • Monitoring devices

How FDA Categorizes

  • Centers for Devices and Radiological Health
  • Centers for Biologics Evaluation and Research

CDRH Categorizes

  • Pre-amendment
  • 510(k) exempt test systems
  • New Premarket Notification 510(k) e.g. special 510(k)s
  • New Premarket Approvals (original, supplement)
  • New Humanitarian Device Exemptions (original, supplement)
  • 510(k) add-to-files
    -Replacement reagents
    -Manufacturer name change
    -Relabel
  • Previously uncategorized test systems

Automatic Categorizations

  • Manufacturer submits premarket submission to Document Mail Center
  • Categorization in conjunction with product review
  • CLIA notification accompanies clearance, approval order or follows shortly after

Automatic Categorization, Replacement Reagents

  • Well characterized analyzers for use by lab professionals.
  • Previously cleared analyzers and reagents
  • Claim is made for a new reagent/analyzer combination.
  • New analyzer family members of a previously cleared analyzer family.

Automatic Categorization

  • Replacement reagent
    -Replacement reagents require a package insert with the new instrument/reagent combination
    -CLIA notification follows shortly after
    -Categorization posted on website

Categorization by Request

  • Change in company name (e.g. Now GWB, formerly WJC)
  • Relabel
  • Not previously categorized
    -defaults to high complexity
  • Submit new labeling to FDA
  • Document Mail Center, HFZ-401, 9200 Corporate Blvd., Rockville, MD 20850
  • "For CLIA Categorization Only"
  • Reference original 510(k) number
  • CLIA categorization performed
  • Notification letter to manufacturer
  • Categorization posted on website
  • Categorization by Request
  • Exempt from 510(k), CLIA required
  • Submit new labeling to FDA
  • "For CLIA Categorization Only"
  • Cite regulation, product code
  • DCLD assigns "X" document number
  • CLIA categorization performed
  • CLIA letter issued
  • Categorization posted on CLIA website
  • Waiver via CMS/PHS 1995 Criteria
  • Test cleared or approved to apply for waiver through process
  • FDA approves waiver protocol
  • Waiver studies begin

 

CBER

  • Manufacturer submits request for product review to CBER
  • When test is cleared, approved, licensed CBER sends test instructions to Clara Sliva
  • CBER test logged into CDRH CLIA database using CBER document number: BK, BP, BL, PL
  • CBER reviewer consults on categorization
  • Notification letter issued by CDRH
  • Categorization posted on CLIA website

Categorization Notification Letter

  • FDA’s document number is the key
  • "k001111" - new 510(k) CDRH
  • "BL002222" - new BLA CBER
  • "k001111/A1" - new trade name
  • complexity
  • test system name
  • analyte name

FDA’s CLIA Workload

  • 1/18/00 - 4/22/02
  • 3,642 categorized
  • 3,121 - moderate
  • 521 -high
  • 301 - waived


>3,121 Tests Categorized

(graph showing approximately 70% Moderate, 28% High and 4% Waived)

Benefits

  • Streamlined administrative process
  • One stop agency for marketing and categorization
  • Reviewer familiar with the products
  • Categorization, no impediment to clearance or approval
  • Improved turn around time, decision

FDA’s CLIA Website

  • "Government Google" for current CLIA information
  • Lists all waived analytes and tests
  • Links to CMS, CDC websites
  • CLIA database

 

CLIA Database

  • Contains all commercially marketed tests categorized by CDC and FDA
  • Several ways to search

Search CLIA Database

  • Search for CLIA records by
    -test system name
    -specialty/subspecialty
    -analyte
    -document number
    -qualifier (reagent application) e.g. SLIVA Analyzer/Dr. Gutman reagent
    -effective date
    -complexity

Tips

  • You may enter the entire test name
  • But most successful if you enter the first word or two
  • Or just the first few letters
  • e.g. first few letters of manufacturer name

 

Mastering the CLIA Database

  • Manufacturer Test System
  • Qualifier
  • Analyte
  • Document Number
  • Complexity
  • Analyte
  • Specialty
  • Effective Date (mm/dd/yyyy)
  • Sort one or a combination of the values and select Search:  

Publication of Categorizations

  • Monthly on FDA’s CLIA Home Page
  • Federal Register Notice, interval to be determined

What We Have Learned

  • Multiple stakeholders
  • Labs
  • Providers
  • Patients
  • Manufacturers
  • Government

Over 28,600 Categorizations

  • Laboratory Inspectors, Laboratories, Manufacturers, and Other Stakeholders Want to Know

 

    
-
-
-
-
-