Medical Devices
Guidance for Industry and for FDA Reviewers - Guidance Document for Premarket Notification Submissions for Nitric Oxide Delivery Apparatus, Nitric Oxide Analyzer and Nitrogen Dioxide Analyzer
Document Issued on: January 24, 2000
![]() | U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Anesthesiology, Respiratory, and Defibrillator Devices Group |
Preface
Public Comment
For 90 days following the date of publication in the Federal Register of the notice announcing the availability of this guidance, comments and suggestions regarding this document should be submitted to Docket No. 99D-5297, Dockets Management Branch, Division of Management Systems and Policy, Office of Human Resources and Management Services, Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, (HFA-305), Room 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.. Such comments will be considered when determining whether to amend the current guidance.
After 90 days following the date of publication in the Federal Register of the notice announcing the availability of this guidance comments and suggestions may be submitted at any time for Agency consideration to: Michael Husband, Center for Devices and Radiological Health (HFZ-450), Food and Drug Administration, 9200 Corporate Blvd., Rockville, MD 20850. Comments may not be acted upon by the Agency until the document is next revised or updated. For questions regarding the use or interpretation of this guidance contact Michael Husband at 240-276-3700.
Additional Copies
World Wide Web/CDRH/home page or CDRH Facts on Demand at 1-800-899-0381 or 301-827-0111, specify number 1157 when prompted for the document shelf number.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction
1.1 Purpose
1.2 Background
1.3 Scope
2. Device Description
2.1 Nitric Oxide Administration Apparatus
2.2 Nitric Oxide Gas Analyzer
2.3 Nitrogen Dioxide Gas Analyzer
3. Specific Criteria and Testing
3.1 Nitric Oxide Delivery Apparatus3.1.1 Loss of nitric oxide therapy and incorrect nitric oxide concentration
3.1.2 Insufficient or excess ventilation or oxygenation
3.1.3 Excessive nitrogen dioxide administration
3.1.4 Potential for catastrophic release of nitric oxide
3.1.5 Adulteration of the nitric oxide
3.1.6 Electrical hazards
3.1.7 Adverse effects on other electronic devices
3.1.8 Release of nitric oxide and release and generation of nitrogen dioxide
3.2 Nitric Oxide Analyzer3.2.1 Nitric Oxide measurement error
3.2.2 Electrical hazards
3.2.3 Adverse effects on other electronic devices3.3.1 Nitrogen Dioxide measurement error
3.3.2 Electrical hazards
3.3.3 Adverse effects on other electronic devices
4. General Criteria and Testing
4.1 General Criteria
4.2 General Test Methods
5. Electrical Safety
5.1 Performance Criteria5.1.1 Battery power
5.1.2 Electrical power indicators
5.1.3 Overcurrent protection
5.1.4 Dielectric withstand
5.1.5 AC power grounding and polarity
5.1.6 Leakage current |
5.1.7 Auxiliary output5.2 Test Methods5.2.1 Battery power
5.2.2 Electrical power indicators
5.2.3 Overcurrent protection
5.2.4 Dielectric withstand
5.2.5 AC power grounding and polarity
5.2.6 Leakage current
5.2.7 Auxiliary output
6. Electromagnetic Compatibility
6.1 Performance Criteria6.1.1 Emissions6.1.1.1 Radiated and conducted electromagnetic energy
6.1.1.2 Magnetic fields6.1.2 Immunity6.1.2.1 Electrostatic discharge
6.1.2.2 Radiated electromagnetic fields
6.1.2.3 AC voltage fluctuations, transients, and surges
6.1.2.4 Conducted electromagnetic energy
6.1.2.5 Magnetic fields
6.1.2.6 Quasi-static electric fields6.2 Test Methods6.2.1 Emissions6.2.1.1 Radiated and conducted electromagnetic energy
6.2.1.2 Magnetic fields6.2.2 Immunity6.2.2.1 Electrostatic discharge
6.2.2.2 Radiated electromagnetic fields
6.2.2.3 AC voltage fluctuations, transients, and surges
6.2.2.4 Conducted electromagnetic energy
6.2.2.5 Magnetic fields
6.2.2.6 Quasi-static electric fields
7. Performance Specifications, Environmental and Mechanical Safety
7.1 Performance Criteria7.1.1 Controls protection
7.1.2 Connector protective incompatibility
7.1.3 Mechanical safety
7.1.4 Mechanical vibration and shock resistance
7.1.5 Fluid spill resistance
7.1.6 High and low temperature and humidity
7.1.7 Surface temperature
7.1.8 Toxic materials
7.1.9 Strangulation
7.1.10 Determination of Endurance
7.1.11 Material Compatibility
7.1.12 Medical Gas Cylinder Connections7.2 Test Methods7.2.1 Controls protection
7.2.2 Connector protective incompatibility
7.2.3 Mechanical safety
7.2.4 Mechanical vibration and shock resistance
7.2.5 Fluid spill resistance
7.2.6 High and low temperature and humidity
7.2.7 Surface temperature
7.2.8 Toxic materials
7.2.9 Strangulation
7.2.10 Determination of Endurance
7.2.11 Material Compatibility
10.1 Identification of Medical Gas Cylinders and Connections
10.2 Instructions for Use10.2.1 Intended Use
10.2.2 Validated Ventilators
10.2.3 Installation Instructions
Document Update and Revision Log
Guidance1 Document for Premarket Notification Submissions for Nitric Oxide Delivery Apparatus, Nitric Oxide Analyzer
and Nitrogen Dioxide Analyzer
SECTION 1. Introduction
1.1 Purpose.
The purpose of this document is to facilitate the preparation and the review of premarket submissions for nitric oxide delivery apparatus, nitric oxide analyzers, and nitrogen dioxide analyzers.
1.2 Background
On September 23, 1996, Ohmeda Inc. submitted a petition under section 513(f)(2) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the act) (21 U.S.C. 360c(f)(2)), requesting that the devices included in the Ohmeda I-NOvent Delivery System intended for administration of inhaled nitric oxide, be reclassified from class III into class II. The system includes three devices which may be separately manufactured; a nitric oxide administration apparatus, a nitric oxide gas analyzer, and a nitrogen dioxide gas analyzer. This guidance document is proposed as a special control for these devices.
This guidance document describes a means by which nitric oxide delivery and analyzing devices and nitrogen dioxide analyzing devices for use during the administration of nitric oxide may comply with the requirement of special controls for Class II devices. Designation of this guidance document as a special control means that manufacturers attempting to establish that their device is substantially equivalent to a predicate device should demonstrate that the proposed device complies with either the specific recommendations of this guidance or some alternate control that provides equivalent assurances of safety and effectiveness.
_____________________
1This guidance document represents the agency’s current thinking on this subject. It does not create or confer any rights for or on any person and does not operate to bind FDA or the public. An alternative approach may be used if such approach satisfies the applicable statute, regulations, or both.
1.3 Scope
This guidance document identifies information that should be included in premarket notifications for the Nitric Oxide Delivery Apparatus, the Nitric Oxide Analyzers, and the Nitrogen Dioxide Analyzers.
A description of certain information typically provided in a premarket notification such as comparative performance evaluations, table of comparison, device description, discussion of similarities and difference, biocompatibility is not included in this guidance. Such information is common for all premarket notifications and is discussed in current guidances and manuals, including the Draft Guidance for Premarket Notification Submissions, and Premarket Notification 510(k). Both of these are available from the Division of Small Manufacturers Assistance (DSMA).
SECTION 2. Device Description
A complete Nitric Oxide Delivery System includes three component medical devices; a nitric oxide administration apparatus, a nitric oxide gas analyzer, and a nitrogen dioxide gas analyzer. Each of the three components of a generic nitric oxide administration system may be manufactured and distributed separately; for that reason this guidance document addresses the three component devices individually.
2.1 Nitric Oxide Administration Apparatus
The nitric oxide administration apparatus (product code MRN) is a device used to add nitric oxide to gases that are to be breathed by a patient. The nitric oxide administration apparatus is to be used in conjunction with a ventilator or other breathing gas administration system. The concentration of nitric oxide is maintained approximately constant during the inspiratory flow regardless of the variation in flow rate within the inspiratory portion of the respiratory cycle. The concentration of inspired nitric oxide can be set, typically in the range of 0 to 80 parts per million (ppm). The administration apparatus includes a pressure regulator and connectors with fittings which are specific for nitric oxide gas cylinders, typically containing 400 or 800 ppm nitric oxide in nitrogen. The nitric oxide administration apparatus design should minimize the time that nitric oxide is mixed with oxygen (dwell time), and thus minimize the concentration of nitrogen dioxide in the gas breathed by the patient (nitrogen dioxide is a toxic reaction product which forms in a chemical reaction of nitric oxide with oxygen).
The administration device should include provisions for a nitric oxide gas concentration gas analyzer with alarms, a nitrogen dioxide gas analyzer with an alarm, and an oxygen analyzer with alarms. Suitable gas analysis devices should be identified in the labeling for the nitric oxide gas administration device.
The delivery system should include or indicate a nitric oxide administration apparatus for use as a "backup" system (product code MRO) for administration of nitric oxide when the main administration apparatus cannot be used.
2.2 Nitric Oxide Gas Analyzer
A nitric oxide gas analyzer (product code MRP) is a device intended to measure the concentration of nitric oxide in respiratory gas mixtures during administration of nitric oxide. The gas should be sampled from the inspiratory limb of the patient circuit. The nitric oxide gas analyzer usually includes provisions for setting upper and lower measured nitric oxide concentrations at which an alarm will be activated.
2.3 Nitrogen Dioxide Gas Analyzer
A nitrogen dioxide gas analyzer (product code MRQ) is a device intended to measure the concentration of nitrogen dioxide in respiratory gas mixtures during administration of nitric oxide. The gas is sampled from the inspiratory limb of the patient circuit. The nitrogen dioxide gas analyzer usually includes provisions for setting an upper measured nitrogen dioxide concentration, with an alarm to be activated when the measured concentration exceeds the set value.
SECTION 3. Specific Criteria and Testing
A nitric oxide administration system has each of these three components; a nitric oxide delivery apparatus, a nitric oxide analyzer, and a nitrogen dioxide analyzer. The components may be manufactured and distributed separately; for that reason this section of the guidance document addresses the three component devices individually.
3.1 Nitric Oxide Delivery Apparatus
The design and testing of the nitric oxide delivery apparatus should take into consideration the risks associated with the device. Risks for the nitric oxide delivery apparatus and the applicable controls are discussed in the follow subsections.
| 3.1.1 | Loss of nitric oxide therapy and incorrect nitric oxide concentration. Loss of nitric oxide therapy may result in acute respiratory failure or acute pulmonary hypertension. Incorrect low nitric oxide concentration may result in ineffective treatment, while incorrect high nitric oxide concentration may result in excess side effects, and generation and administration of excess nitrogen dioxide. | ||||||||||||||||||||
The controls for this risk consist of the following elements: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
| 3.1.2 | Insufficient or excess ventilation or oxygenation may result from the effects of the nitric oxide administration system on the function of the ventilator or other respiratory gas administration system with which the nitric oxide administration system is used. | ||||
To control the risk of insufficient or excess ventilation or oxygenation: | |||||
|
| 3.1.3 | Excessive nitrogen dioxide administration is a risk associated with nitric oxide administration. Nitrogen dioxide is a toxic gas formed by reaction of nitric oxide with oxygen. Conditions for this reaction are well-described. The toxicity of nitrogen dioxide may in part be mediated by the formation of acid products by reaction of nitrogen dioxide with water. While levels of nitrogen dioxide less that 5 ppm meet OSHA standards for industrial exposure, and the recommended NIOSH limit is 1 ppm, patient exposure should be at a practical minimum. The currently available data (NINOS and Ohmeda) was developed using devices which provide minimal dwell time. Other devices under development are also capable of similar low values of nitrogen dioxide production. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
To control the risk of excessive nitrogen dioxide administration: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3.2 Nitric Oxide AnalyzerThe design and testing of the nitric oxide analyzer should take into consideration the risks associated with the device. Risks for the nitric oxide analyzer and the applicable controls are discussed in the follow subsections.
3.3 Nitrogen Dioxide AnalyzerThe design and testing of the nitrogen dioxide analyzer should take into consideration the risks associated with the device. Risks for the nitrogen dioxide analyzer and the applicable controls are discussed in the follow subsections.
SECTION 4. General Criteria and TestingThe following subsections apply to the nitric oxide administration devices, nitric oxide analyzers and nitrogen dioxide analyzers. 4.1 General CriteriaThe 510(k) premarket notification application should include testing information demonstrating safety and effectiveness of the performance characteristics of the device in the intended environment of use. The type of the device and its intended environment will determine the type of testing that is necessary. Recommended environmental, electrical, electromagnetic compatibility, and mechanical test procedures and protocols are discussed in the following sections. The submitted information should include the test procedures and protocols, an explanation as to how the test procedures simulate the intended environment of use and are comparable to the test procedures outlined below, test results, and an analysis of the results. If device failure occurs during the testing, a justification as to why such a failure does not affect safety or effectiveness, and/or a description of device modifications (i.e., identification of each modification, rationale for each modification) and follow-up testing demonstrating that the modification alleviates the problem should be provided. 4.2 General Test MethodsGeneral test methods should be established and utilized for verifying that device performance is within specification when subjected to the environmental testing procedures in the subsequent sections. This testing information should be included in the premarket notification submission. Also, information concerning the design of, and rationale for, the tests used to demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of the device in the intended environment, together with the testing procedures and protocols, results, and analyses of the results, should be provided in the 510(k) premarket notification submission. Unless otherwise specified, the test conditions should be as follows: Temperature: 15 to 35° C For modular devices, test in more than one typical module configuration with the other modules operating. The following should be used to verify proper device alarming capabilities and self test functions in the subsequent sections of the test methods.
SECTION 5. Electrical Safety5.1 Performance Criteria
5.2 Test MethodsFor modular devices, test in more than one typical module configuration with the other modules operating.
SECTION 6. Electromagnetic Compatibility6.1 Performance CriteriaDevices should meet the electromagnetic compatibility requirements contained in sections 6.1 and 6.2 and should also meet these requirements when recharging batteries (if applicable) from or operating from a grounded or an ungrounded ac power source (i.e., with the third-wire ground connected and with it disconnected at the plug end of the power cord). The device should operate within its specification without emitting electromagnetic energy in excess of the levels specified below. The required emission limit should be that specified by the referenced document, adjusted downward by the rms sum of all errors in the measurement of that quantity. 6.1.1.1 Radiated and conducted electromagnetic energy The device should comply with the relevant requirements of CISPR 11 when tested according to the specified test methods of this guidance document. The device should comply with the relevant requirements of RE101 (Army, 7-cm distance) of MIL-STD-461D from 30 Hz to 100 kHz when tested at the 7-cm distance according to RE101 of MIL-STD-462D. The device should operate within its specification during and after exposure to electromagnetic interference at the levels specified below. The required immunity level should be the level stated, adjusted upward by the rms sum of all errors in the measurement of that quantity, with the exception of the lower steady-state ac voltage limit and the line-voltage sag level, which should be adjusted downward by the rms sum of the measurement errors. The device should not, as a result of the specified test condition: indicate an equipment alarm, exhibit temporary degradation or loss of function or performance which requires operator intervention or system reset, or exhibit loss or corruption of stored data. Details of test conditions are specified in section 6.2 of this guidance document. 6.1.2.1 Electrostatic discharge The device should operate within its specification within 5 seconds of air discharges of 2, 4, 6, and 8 kV applied to insulating surfaces and contact discharges of 2, 4, and 6 kV applied to conductive surfaces, both positive and negative, to include any point on the device accessible to the operator or patient, when tested according to IEC 801-2, as specified in section 6.2. The device should operate within its specification within 5 seconds of contact discharges applied to horizontal and vertical conducting planes in the vicinity of the device, as specified in section 6.2. 6.1.2.2 Radiated electromagnetic fields The device should operate within its specification during and after exposure to electromagnetic fields at frequencies between 26 MHz and 1 GHz at field strengths up to 3 V/m (when unmodulated), amplitude modulated 80 percent with a sine wave or 100 percent with a square wave. A modulation frequency that is within each significant signal-processing passband of the device should used. For devices not having a defined passband, a modulation frequency of 0.5 Hz should be used. The modulation frequency should be specified in 510(k) premarket notification. 6.1.2.3 AC voltage fluctuations, transients, and surges The following items apply to all devices that recharge batteries from or operate from the ac power line:
6.1.2.4 Conducted electromagnetic energy The device should operate within its specification during and after exposure of each interconnecting cable, including power cables, to conducted electromagnetic energy at frequencies between 10 kHz and 100 MHz at the levels specified in CS114, Curve #3, of MIL-STD-461D, when tested according to CS114 of MIL-STD-462D. A modulation frequency that is within each significant signal-processing passband of the device should be used. For devices not having a defined passband, a modulation frequency of 0.5 Hz should be used. The modulation frequency should be specified in the 510(k) premarket notification. The device should operate within its specification during and after exposure to magnetic fields at frequencies between 30 Hz and 100 kHz as specified in RS101 (Army) of MIL-STD-461D, when tested according to RS101 of MIL-STD-462D. A modulation frequency that is within each significant signal-processing passband of the device should be used. For devices not having a defined passband, a modulation frequency of 0.5 Hz should be used. The modulation frequency should be specified in the 510(k) premarket notification. 6.1.2.6 Quasi-static electric fields The device should operate within its specification during and after exposure to a sinusoidally varying electric field at 0.5 Hz with peak field strengths up to 2000 volts per meter. Note: This test simulates the movement of electrostatically charged fabrics and objects that could come into close proximity to the device. 6.2 Test MethodsDevices should be tested for electromagnetic emissions and immunity to electromagnetic interference as described herein. Devices should be tested with the third wire ground connected at the plug end of the power cord. Devices intended for home use should be tested with the third wire ground connected and with it disconnected at the plug end of the power cord. Emissions measurements should be made as specified in the referenced document. The required emission limit should be that specified by the referenced document, adjusted downward by the rms sum of all errors in the measurement of that quantity. Emission in excess of the adjusted limit should constitute failure of this test. These tests should be conducted using passive patient simulators, which in general are not capable of simulating normal patient signals. 6.2.1.1 Radiated and conducted electromagnetic energy The device should be tested according to CISPR 11. The device should be tested for radiated magnetic field emissions between 30 Hz and 100 kHz as specified in RE101 of MIL-STD-462D, using the Army 7-cm limit. Measurements should be made at the 7-cm distance only. Immunity of the device to electromagnetic interference should be determined as specified in the referenced document, with the modifications listed below. The required immunity level should be the level stated, adjusted upward by the rms sum of all errors in the measurement of that quantity, with the exception of the lower steady-state ac voltage limit and the line-voltage sag level, which should be adjusted downward by the rms sum of the measurement errors. Any of the following should constitute failure of this test: an equipment alarm, temporary degradation or loss of function or performance which requires operator intervention or system reset, or loss or corruption of stored data. Patient simulators should be used to provide simulated normal stimulus to sensors during electromagnetic immunity testing. 6.2.2.1 Electrostatic discharge The device should be tested with air discharges at 2, 4, 6, and 8 kV applied to insulating surfaces and contact discharges at 2, 4, and 6 kV applied to conductive surfaces. Failure to resume normal operation (with no operator intervention) within 5 seconds of a discharge should constitute failure of this test. All test failure conditions listed above apply. The device should be tested according to IEC 801-2, with the following conditions and modifications:
6.2.2.3 AC voltage fluctuations, transients, and surges The tests described below should be performed on all devices intended to recharge batteries or operate from the ac power line.
6.2.2.4 Conducted electromagnetic energy The device should be tested for immunity to conducted electromagnetic energy on each power and signal lead at frequencies between 10 kHz and 100 MHZ at the levels specified in curve #3 of CS114 of MIL-STD-461D, using the test methods specified in CS114 of MIL-STD-462D, with the modifications and additions listed below.
Test according to RS101 of MIL-STD-462D. The test should be performed from 30 Hz to 100 kHz. 6.2.2.6 Quasi-static electric fields
SECTION 7. Performance Specifications, Environmental and Mechanical Safety7.1 Performance CriteriaThe controls of medical devices should be protected from inadvertent or unauthorized changes or adjustment. The means of protection should be such as to preclude their defeat by patients, or other unauthorized persons. All controls which increase or decrease a function should be marked with a legible indication to inform the operator which action(s) is (are) required to increase/decrease the controlled function. Controls and their associated markings should be visible or legible, or both, to an operator having a visual acuity of at least 1.0 when the operator is located at lest 1 meter in front of the device and the ambient illuminance level is 215 lx, when viewing the information, marking, etc. perpendicular to, and including 15 degrees above, below, left and right. Controls should be identified with their associated markings. For controls, movement upwards, to right, or in a clockwise direction should increase the control function. Movement downwards, to the left, or a counterclockwise direction should decrease the control function. Rotary gas flow controls are exempt from this performance criterion. 7.1.2 Connector protective incompatibility
Each device should:
7.1.4 Mechanical vibration and shock resistance The device (i.e., the complete system suitable for its intended use) should withstand the mechanical shocks and vibrations expected in the environments of intended use as defined by the test methods contained herein, and should remain operational within its specification. The device should be so constructed that it continues to operate within its specification after fluids have been dripped on the device. Therefore, the device should meet the requirements for drip-proof equipment as specified in Clause 44.6 of IEC 601-1 and IEC 529. 7.1.6 High and low temperature and humidity
Temperature of surfaces of a device an operator can contact during operation should not exceed 50 degrees C in an ambient of 35 degrees C. The temperature of surfaces that may come in contact with the patient should not exceed 41 degrees C in an ambient of 35 degrees C. Any surface temperature that may come in contact with the patient exceeding 41 degrees C, should be justified with a scientifically valid explanation and data should be provided which demonstrates that the safety of the patient is not compromised. No toxic material from a device should come in contact with patient or operator during normal use. Provision should be made in routing, retention devices, or other means to minimize the risk of strangulation of the patient by wires or tubing. This may also be accomplished by providing instructions for routing of patient wires and tubing in the device labeling. 7.1.10 Determination of Endurance Compliance with device specifications should be determined with one or more samples of production system or components of the system (Nitric Oxide analyzer or Nitrogen Oxide analyzer). Each system or component should be tested for endurance as described in 7.2.11. The system should run for 2000 h. Parts should be made of materials that are compatible with the gases and agents with which those components are designed to come into contact, and minimize health risks due to substances leached from the device in use. 7.1.12 Medical Gas Cylinder Connections Connectors of calibration gas cylinders not already specified in relevant national standards such as CGA C-9-1982 should be designed differently from the connectors specified for other medical gases. 7.2 Test MethodsTest by inspection. 7.2.2 Connector protective incompatibility Test by inspection and by attempting the prohibited connections. Test by inspection. 7.2.4 Mechanical vibration and shock resistance Test the device (i.e., the complete system suitable for its intended use) to the following severity levels as specified in the following IEC 68-2 Basic Environmental Testing Procedures. Following each of these tests, the device should be visually inspected. Any evidence of damage or inability to perform within specification should constitute failure of the test.
Test the device as specified in Clause 44.6 of IEC 601-1 for drip-proof and equipment. Following each of these tests, the device should be visually inspected. Any evidence of damage or inability to perform within specification should constitute failure of the test. 7.2.6 High and low temperature and humidity Test the device as specified in Method Numbers 501.3, 502.3, and 507.3 of MIL-STD-810E according to the requirements of section (i)(6) of this document. Failure of the device to perform within its specification should constitute failure of these tests. Operate the device in an ambient temperature of 35° C. Measure the temperature of the device surfaces which are not intended to contact the patient. The presence of any temperature greater than 50° C should constitute failure of this test. Measure the temperature of device surfaces which are likely to contact the patient in normal use. Any temperature above 41° C should constitute failure of this test. Determine by inspection that listed and any other known toxic materials used in the device are packaged in a manner that prevents patient and operator contact. Test by inspection. 7.2.10 Determination of Endurance Simulated testing should be performed using a ventilator, test lung, humidifier, delivery apparatus and analyzers. The inspriatory/expiratory phase time ratio should be as close to 1:2 as possible, and run the test system for 2000 hours with appropriate patient population settings. The delivery apparatus should titrate at least 20 ppm of Nitric Oxide throughout the duration of the testing. Parts which come in contact with the gases and agents should be revalidated to ensure that the specifications are met after the endurance testing. Simulated testing should address issues such as corrosion and chemical interaction which could affect mechanical or electrical properties. SECTION 8. Hardware DocumentationThis information should include a description of the hardware requirements, device performance requirements, the potential system hazards, and the hardware and/or software functions implemented as a result of such potential hazards. Documentation of the hardware development process including quality assurance activities, configuration management plan, and verification activities and summaries, in accordance with the appropriate level of concern, should also be provided. The hardware information should include the most recent verification and validation test plans/protocols, identification of which activities were performed prior to and after hardware/software integration, verification and validation results, and analyses showing that specifications were met at each appropriate level of hardware. Written affirmation stating that the described hardware was developed and tested according to the stated procedures/methods and test showed requirements were met should be provided. The hardware information should also identify of the version level featured in the final design of the device. SECTION 9. Software DocumentationIf the device is software-driven, the premarket notification should include software information in accordance with the Guidance for the content of Premarket Submissions for Software Contained in Medical Devices. This information should include a description of the software requirements, device performance requirements, the potential system hazards, and the software and/or hardware functions implemented as a result of such potential hazards. Documentation of the software development process including quality assurance activities, configuration management plan, and verification activities and summaries, in accordance with the appropriate level of concern, as discussed in the current guidance for software, should also be provided. The level of concern should be identified with the hazard analysis. The software information should include the most recent verification and validation test plans/protocols, identification of which activities were performed prior to and after software/hardware integration, verification and validation results, and analyses showing that specifications were met at each appropriate level of software. Written affirmation stating that the described software was developed and tested according to the stated procedures/methods and test showed requirements were met should be provided. The software information should also identify of the software version level featured in the final design of the device. SECTION 10. LabelingThe premarket notification should include all labeling (i.e., device labels, instructions for use, promotional material) for the device under review. Recommendations for labeling content are included in the Device Labeling Guidance (ODE Blue Book #G91-1) and specific labeling discussed in this guidance. The nitric oxide administration apparatus, nitric oxide gas analyzer, and nitrogen dioxide gas analyzer are restricted to use only upon the written or oral authorization of a practitioner licensed by law to use the device and that the device be restricted to use by persons with experience or training in its use. In accordance with 21 CFR 801.109(b)(1), the labeling for prescription devices is required to bear the required caution prescription statement. This statement should read, "Caution: Federal law restricts this device to sale by or on the order of a physician or other licensed medical practitioner. The nitric oxide administration apparatus, nitric oxide gas analyzer, and nitrogen dioxide gas analyzer labeling should include a warning that "Persons using this device should be trained and experienced in the use of this device, to assure effective administration of nitric oxide, and to avoid injury to the patient or to others resulting from inhalation of excess nitric oxide, nitrogen dioxide or other reaction products." 10.1 Identification of Medical Gas Cylinders and ConnectionsColors of calibration gas cylinders not already specified in relevant national standards such as CGA C-9-1982 should be color-coded differently from the colors specified for medical gases. 10.2 Instructions for UseThe instructions for use should include a description of the intended use and a description of the principles of operation of the components of the Nitric Oxide System The instructions for use should include a list of ventilators that have been validated for use with the nitric oxide administration device, nitric oxide analyzer and nitrogen dioxide analyzer. 10.2.3 Installation Instructions The instructions for use should include a description of the correct installation of the Nitric Oxide System or any of its components. |









