• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

Inspections, Compliance, Enforcement, and Criminal Investigations

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail

National Food & Beverage, Inc 10/26/12

  

Department of Health and Human Services logoDepartment of Health and Human Services

Public Health Service
Food and Drug Administration
 Dallas District
4040 North Central Expressway
Dallas, Texas 75204-3128 

 

October 26, 2012
 
 
2013-DAL-WL-007
 
WARNING LETTER
 
 
UPS Overnight
 
 
Aaron Edelen, President
National Food and Beverage, Inc.
9030 Premier Row
Dallas, Texas 75247
 
Dear Mr. Edelen:
 
On June 14 through 20, 2012, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) conducted an inspection of your facility located at 9000 Premier Row, Dallas, Texas, where you manufacture several varieties of acidified foods. The inspection revealed serious violations of the regulations for acidified foods (Title 21, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 108, Emergency Permit Control (21 CFR Part 108) and Part 114, Acidified Foods (21 CFR Part 114)). Accordingly, we have determined that your acidified food products are adulterated within the meaning of Section 402(a)(4) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (“the Act”) [21 U.S.C. § 342(a)(4)], in that have been prepared, packed, or held under insanitary conditions whereby they may have become contaminated with filth, or whereby they may have been rendered injurious to health. You can find the Act and the Acidified Food regulations through links in FDA's home page at http://www.fda.gov.
 
As an acidified food processor, you are required to comply with the Act and the federal regulations relating to the processing of acidified foods and current good manufacturing practices. These regulations are described in 21 CFR Part 108, Emergency Permit Control, and in 21 CFR Part 114, Acidified Foods. The Emergency Permit Control regulation was issued, in part, pursuant to Section 404 of the Act (21 U.S.C. § 344). A temporary emergency permit may be required for acidified foods whenever a processor has failed to fulfill the requirements of 21 CFR Part 108, Subpart B, including registration and filing of process information, and the mandatory requirements of 21 CFR 114.
 
During our inspection, we observed the following significant violations:
 
  1. As a commercial processor engaged in the thermal processing of acidified foods you must, not later than 60 days after registration and prior to the packing of a new product, provide the Food and Drug Administration information as to the scheduled processes including conditions for heat processing and control of pH, salt, sugar, and preservative level, and source and date of the establishment of the process, for each acidified food in each container size, as required by 21 CFR 108.25(c)(2).
 
Specifically, your firm has failed to file a scheduled process for the following acidified foods that your firm manufacturers: Wasabi Aioli Sauce, (b)(4) Aioli Sauce, Buffalo Aioli Sauce, (b)(4) Aioli Sauce, Roasted Garlic Aioli Sauce, and (b)(4) Sauce.
 
We acknowledge receipt of your firm’s letter dated June 27, 2012, in response to the observations listed on FDA Form 483, in which your Quality Assurance Director stated that the scheduled processes for these products would be filed within five to seven business days. However, as of the date of this letter, we have not received your scheduled processes.
 
Scheduled process information for acidified foods must be submitted on Form FDA 2541a (Processing Filing for all Processing Methods Except Low Acid Aseptic). More information on registration and filing can be found in the publication “Instructions for Establishment Registration and Processing Filing for Acidified and Low-Acid Canned Foods,” available at: http://www.fda.govlFood/FoodSafetylProductSpecificInformation/AcidifiedLowAcidCannedFoods/default.htm.
 
  1. You must maintain processing and production records showing adherence to scheduled processes, including records of pH measurements and other critical factors intended to ensure a safe product, and containing sufficient additional information such as product code, date, container size, and product, to permit a public health hazard evaluation of the processes applied to each lot, batch, or other portion of production, to comply with 21 CFR 114.100(b). 
 
However, you failed to maintain processing and production records showing adherence to the scheduled processes, including measurements of critical factors. Specifically, your firm did not document the critical measurements of fill temperature, hold temperature, and/or hold time for (b)(4) lots of acidified foods manufactured from 2/29/2012 to 6/15/2012.
 
In your response letter you stated that you will establish fill and storage temperature guidelines and that you have purchased a temperature data-logger unit. However, you have not provided evidence that you have implemented the new procedures, or explained how you will implement the monitoring of the hold time critical factor. You also have not provided evidence that you have trained your personnel in these new procedures.
 
 
The above list is not intended to be an all-inclusive list of deficiencies at your facility. It is your responsibility to assure that your establishment is in compliance with all requirements of the Act and federal regulations. You should take prompt measures to correct all violations described in this letter. Failure to take appropriate corrective action may subject your firm and products to further actions, such as emergency permit control, injunction, or seizure.
 
Section 743 of the Act (21 U.S.C. 379j-31) authorizes FDA to assess and collect fees to cover FDA’s costs for certain activities, including re-inspection-related costs. A re-inspection is one or more inspections conducted subsequent to an inspection that identified noncompliance materially related to a food safety requirement of the Act, specifically to determine whether compliance has been achieved. Re-inspection-related costs means all expenses, including administrative expenses, incurred in connection with FDA’s arranging, conducting, and evaluating the results of the re-inspection and assessing and collecting the re-inspection fees (21 U.S.C. 379j-31(a)(2)(B)).
 
For a domestic facility, FDA will assess and collect fees for re-inspection-related costs from the responsible party for the domestic facility. The inspection noted in this letter identified noncompliance materially related to a food safety requirement of the Act. Accordingly, FDA may assess fees to cover any re-inspection-related costs.
 
You should notify this office in writing within fifteen (15) working days from your receipt of this letter, of the specific steps you have taken to correct the noted deviations, including an explanation of each step taken to prevent their recurrence. In your response, include documentation of your corrective actions or steps towards long term corrective actions, such as evidence that you are working with a process authority or your scheduled process has been filed with the FDA. If you cannot complete all corrective actions before you respond, we expect that you will explain the reason for your delay and state when you will correct the remaining deficiencies.
 
Your written response should be sent to Seri L. Essary, Compliance Officer, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 4040 North Central Expressway, Dallas, TX, 75204. If you have questions regarding any issues in this letter, please contact Ms. Essary at (214)253-5335.
                                                                       
Sincerely,
/S/ 
Reynaldo R. Rodriguez, Jr.
Dallas District Director