• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

Inspections, Compliance, Enforcement, and Criminal Investigations

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail

Section Contents Menu

Enforcement Actions

Scheenstra Farms Inc 06-Feb-08

Department of Health and Human Services' logoDepartment of Health and Human Services

Public Health Service
Food and Drug Administration

 

Seattle District
Pacific Region
22201 23rd Drive SE
Bothell, WA 98021-4421

Telephone: 425-486-8788
FAX: 425-483-4996


February 6, 2008

CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED

In reply refer to Warning Letter SEA 08-09

William R. Scheenstra, President
Scheenstra Farms, Inc.
2850 Alexander Road
Sunnyside, Washington 98944-9787

WARNING LETTER

Dear Mr. Scheenstra:

An inspection of your dairy operation, conducted by a representative of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on November 27 and 30, 2007, confirmed that you offered an animal for sale for slaughter as food that was adulterated under sections 402(a)(2)(C)(ii) [21 U.S.C. § 342(a)(2)(C)(ii)] and 402(a)(4) [21 U.S.C. § 342(a)(4)] of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act). The inspection also revealed that you caused the new animal drug ampicillin to become unsafe under section 512(a) [21 U.S.C. § 360b(a)] of the Act and adulterated within the meaning of section 501(a)(5) [21 U.S.C. § 351(a)(5)] of the Act. You can find the Act and its associated regulations on the internet through links on the FDA's web page at www.fda.gov.

On or about May 14 2007, you sold a dairy cow, identified with back tag [redacted] for slaughter as food to [redacted] who subsequently sold the animal to [redacted]. On or about May 15, 2007, this animal was slaughtered. The United States Department of Agriculture, Food Safety, and Inspection Service (USDA/FSIS) analysis of tissue samples collected from this animal identified the presence of ampicillin in the liver at 0.04 parts per million (ppm) and the kidney at 0.70 ppm. A tolerance of 0.01 ppm has been established for residues of ampicillin in the uncooked edible tissues of cattle as codified in Title 21, Code of Federal Regulations, section 556.40 (21 C.F.R. 556.40.) The presence of this drug in these amounts in uncooked, edible tissues from this animal causes the food to be adulterated within the meaning of section 402(a)(2)(C)(ii) [21 U.S.C. § 342(a)(2)(C)(ii)] of the Act.

Our inspection also found that you hold animals under conditions that are so inadequate that medicated animals bearing potentially harmful drug residues are likely to enter the food supply. You lack an adequate system to ensure that animals medicated by you have been withheld from slaughter for appropriate periods of time to permit depletion of potentially hazardous residues of drugs from edible tissues. For example, you failed to maintain complete treatment records. Food from animals held under such conditions is adulterated within the meaning of section 402(a)(4) [21 U.S.C. § 342 (a)(4)] of the Act.

In addition, you adulterated the new animal drug ampicillin within the meaning of section 501 (a)(5) [21 U.S.C. § 351 (a)(5)] of the Act when you failed to use the drug in conformance with its approved labeling. "Extralabel use," i.e., the actual or intended use of the drug in an animal in a manner that is not in accordance with the approved labeling, is only permitted if the use complies with sections 512(a)(4) [21 U.S.C. § 360b(a)(4)] and 512(a)(5) [21 U.S.C. § 360b(a)(5)] of the Act and 21 C.F.R. Part 530. Our investigation found that your extralabel use of ampicillin failed to comply with these requirements.

For example, you administered ampicillin for a condition (mastitis) not set forth in the approved labeling and you did so without the supervision of a licensed veterinarian, in violation of 21 C.F.R. 530.11(a). Furthermore, your extralabel use resulted in an illegal drug residue in violation of 21 C.F.R. 530.11(d). Because your extralabel use of this drug was not in compliance with 21 C.F.R. Part 530, the drug is unsafe under section 512(a) [21 U.S.C. § 360b(a)] of the Act and your use caused it to be adulterated within the meaning of section 501(a)(5) [21 U.S.C. § 351(a)(5)] of the Act.

The above is not intended to be an all-inclusive list of violations. As a producer of animals offered for use as food, you are responsible for ensuring that your overall operation and the food you distribute is in compliance with the law. You should take prompt action to correct the above violations and to establish procedures whereby such violations do not recur. Failure to do so may result in regulatory action without further notice such as seizure and/or injunction

You should notify this office in writing of the steps you have taken to bring your firm into compliance with the law within fifteen (15) working days of receiving this letter. Your response should include each step that has been taken or will be taken to correct the violations and prevent their recurrence. If corrective action cannot be completed within fifteen (15) working days, state the reason for the delay and the time within which the corrections will be completed. Please include copies of any available documentation demonstrating that corrections have been made.

Your written response should be sent to Lisa M. Elrand, Compliance Officer, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 22201 23rd Drive SE, Bothell, Washington 98021-4421. If you have any questions about this letter, please contact Compliance Officer Lisa M. Elrand at 425-483-4913.

Sincerely,

/S/

Charles M. Breen
District Director

cc: FSIS Policy Development Division
United States Department of Agriculture
Food Safety and Inspection Service
Landmark Center
1299 Farnam Street, suite 300
Omaha, Nebraska 68102

FSIS District Office
665 South Broadway, Suite B
Boulder, Colorado 80303