Inspections, Compliance, Enforcement, and Criminal Investigations
LSG Sky Chefs 31-Jul-03
Public Health Service
|San Francisco District
1431 Harbor Bey Parkway
Alameda. CA 94502-7070
VIA PEDERAL EXPRESS
Our Reference: 2939642
July 31, 2003
Gary Berndt, Chief Operating Officer
LSG Sky Chefs
Sky Chefs, Inc.
6191 North State Highway 161
Irving, Texas 75038
Dear Mr. Berndt:
On March 7 and 25, 2003, we inspected your processing facility, located at 385 Commercial Street, San Jose, CA. We found that you have serious deviations Erom the Seafood Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points (HACCP) Regulations, Title 21, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 123 (21 CFR 123).
We acknowledge receipt on June 11, 2003 of a revised HACCP Plan for Tuna Salad Sandwiches from Eleanor Garlit, LSG Cky Chefs, San Jose, CA, updated on April 7, 2003. This letter is based on the March 2003 inspection and review of this revised April
7, 2003 HACCP Plan. In accordance with 21 CFR 123.6(g), failure of a processor to have and implement a HACCP plan that complies with this section or otherwise operate in accordance with the requirements of this part, renders the fishery products adulterated within the meaning of Section 402(a)(4) of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (the Act), 21 U.S.C. 342(a)(4). Accordingly your tuna salad sandwich product is adulterated, in that the product has been prepared, packed, or held under insanitary conditions whereby it may have been rendered injurious to health. You may find the Act and the Seafood HACCP
Regulations through links in FDAs home page at www.fda.gov.
The deviations were as follows:
1. You must conduct a hazard analysis to determine whether there are food safety hazards that are reasonably likely to occur and have a HACCP plan that, at a minimum, lists the critical control points, to comply with 21 CFR 123.6(a) and (c)(2). A critical control point is defined in 21 CFR 123.3(b) as a point, step, or procedure in a food process at which control can be applied and a food safety hazard can as a result be prevented, eliminated, or reduced to acceptable levels. However, your firms HACCP plan for Tuna Salad Sandwiches does not list the critical control points of prepamtion and finished product storage for controlling the food safety
hazards of histamine and pathogen formation.
2. You must maintain sanitation control records that, at a minimum document monitoring and corrections, to comply with 21 CFR 123.11(c). However, your firm did not maintain sanitation monitoring records for
- Safety of the water
- Condition and cleanliness of food-contact surfaces
- Prevention of cross-contamination
- Maintenance of hand washing, hand sanitizing, and toilet facilities
- Protection of food, food packaging material, and food contact surfaces fromadulteration with contaminants
- Proper labeling, storage, and use of toxic compounds
- Control of employee health conditions that could result in microbiological contamination and
- Exclusion of pests from the facility
required for the processing of tuna salad sandwiches on the following dates:
February 12 to 18, 2003 and February 21 to March 15, 2003.
3. You must maintain sanitation control records that, at a minimum, document monitoring and corrections to comply with 21 CFR 123.11(c). However your firms monitoring records do not list all eight areas of sanitation as specified in 21 CFR 123.11(b).
4. You must conduct a hazard analysis to determine whether there are food safety hazards that are reasonably likely to occur and have a HACCP plan that, at a minimum, lists the food safety hazards that are reasonably likely to occur, to comply with 21 CFR 123.6(a) and (c)(1). A food safety hazard is defined in 21 CFR 123.3(f) as any biological, chemical, or physical property that may cause a food to be unsafe for human consumption. However, your firms revised HACCP Plan for Tuna Salad Sandwiches does not specifically list the food safety hazards of histamine formation and pathogen growth. Histamine formation is a chemical hazard and pathogen
growth is a biological hazard.
We may take further action if you do not promptly correct these violations. For instance, we may take further action to seize your products and/or enjoin your firm from operating. Please respond in writing within 15 working days from your receipt of this letter. Your
response should outline the specific things you are doing to correct these deviations. You should include in your response documentation that would assist us in evaluating your corrections. If you cannot complete all corrections before you respond, we expect that you will explain the reason for your delay and state when you will correct any remaining deviations.
This letter may not list all the deviations at your facility. You are responsible for ensuring that your processing plant operates in compliance with the Act, the Seafood HACCP Regulations and the Current Good Mannufacturing Practice regulations (21 CFR
Part 110). You also have a responsibility to use procedures to prevent further violations of the Federal Food, Drug., and Cosmetic Act and all applicable regulations.
Your response should be directed to: Ms. Harumi Kishida, Compliance Officer, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 143 1 Harbor Bay Parkway, Ahmeda, CA 94502-7070.
If you have any questions regarding any issue in this letter, please contact Ms. Kishida at
Charles D. Moss, Acting DDDennis K. Linsley
San Francisco District