For Industry
Accessible Text Version - Standard Costs (in thousands of dollars) for Components of the Process for the Review of Human Drug Applications (FY 1993 - FY 2002)
SummaryThis table lists the cost for each submission type for each fiscal year from 1993 to 2002. For fiscal years 1993 through 2000, all are determined on the basis of the Arthur Andersen model developed in 1993. The KPMG model is used for fiscal years 2001 and 2002. The two submission types displayed are drug applications and biologic applications. Drug applications include investigational new drug application (IND), new drug application (NDA) with clinical data - new molecular entity (NME), NDA with clinical data - non-new molecular entity, NDA without clinical data, supplement with clinical data, and supplement without clinical data. Biological applications include investigational new drug application (IND), biologics license application (BLA), product license application (PLA), establishment license application (ELA), supplement with clinical data, and supplement without clinical data. Row 1. IND, Drug Applications.Cell 1. Fiscal year 1993.$70 Cell 2. Fiscal year 1994.$79 Cell 3. Fiscal year 1995.$98 Cell 4. Fiscal year 1996.$97 Cell 5. Fiscal year 1997.$84 Cell 6. Fiscal year 1998.$94 Cell 7. Fiscal year 1999.$105 Cell 8. Fiscal year 2000.$119 Cell 9. Fiscal year 2001.$200 Cell 10. Fiscal year 2002.$211.8 Row 2. NDA with Clinical Data - NME, Drug Applications.Cell 1. Fiscal year 1993.$887 Cell 2. Fiscal year 1994.$1,004 Cell 3. Fiscal year 1995.$1,243 Cell 4. Fiscal year 1996.$1,233 Cell 5. Fiscal year 1997.$1,065 Cell 6. Fiscal year 1998.$1,194 Cell 7. Fiscal year 1999.$1,328 Cell 8. Fiscal year 2000.$1,503 Cell 9. Fiscal year 2001.$1,920 Cell 10. Fiscal year 2002.$2,037.0 Row 3. NDA with Clinical Data - Non-NME, Drug Applications.Cell 1. Fiscal year 1993.$298 Cell 2. Fiscal year 1994.$337 Cell 3. Fiscal year 1995.$417 Cell 4. Fiscal year 1996.$414 Cell 5. Fiscal year 1997.$358 Cell 6. Fiscal year 1998.$401 Cell 7. Fiscal year 1999.$446 Cell 8. Fiscal year 2000.$505 Cell 9. Fiscal year 2001.$929 Cell 10. Fiscal year 2002.$985.9 Row 4. NDA without Clinical Data, Drug Applications.Cell 1. Fiscal year 1993.$127 Cell 2. Fiscal year 1994.$144 Cell 3. Fiscal year 1995.$178 Cell 4. Fiscal year 1996.$177 Cell 5. Fiscal year 1997.$152 Cell 6. Fiscal year 1998.$171 Cell 7. Fiscal year 1999.$190 Cell 8. Fiscal year 2000.$215 Cell 9. Fiscal year 2001.$261 Cell 10. Fiscal year 2002.$276.6 Row 5. Supplement with Clinical Data, Drug Applications.Cell 1. Fiscal year 1993.$151 Cell 2. Fiscal year 1994.$171 Cell 3. Fiscal year 1995.$212 Cell 4. Fiscal year 1996.$210 Cell 5. Fiscal year 1997.$181 Cell 6. Fiscal year 1998.$203 Cell 7. Fiscal year 1999.$226 Cell 8. Fiscal year 2000.$256 Cell 9. Fiscal year 2001.$111 Cell 10. Fiscal year 2002.$118.1 Row 6. Supplement without Clinical Data, Drug Applications.Cell 1. Fiscal year 1993.$6 Cell 2. Fiscal year 1994.$7 Cell 3. Fiscal year 1995.$8 Cell 4. Fiscal year 1996.$8 Cell 5. Fiscal year 1997.$7 Cell 6. Fiscal year 1998.$8 Cell 7. Fiscal year 1999.$9 Cell 8. Fiscal year 2000.$10 Cell 9. Fiscal year 2001.$8 Cell 10. Fiscal year 2002.$8.1 Row 7. IND, Biologic Applications.Cell 1. Fiscal year 1993.$184 Cell 2. Fiscal year 1994.$230 Cell 3. Fiscal year 1995.$234 Cell 4. Fiscal year 1996.$266 Cell 5. Fiscal year 1997.$204 Cell 6. Fiscal year 1998.$173 Cell 7. Fiscal year 1999.$243 Cell 8. Fiscal year 2000.$175 Cell 9. Fiscal year 2001.$287 Cell 10. Fiscal year 2002.$278.9 Row 8. BLA, Biologic Applications.Cell 1. Fiscal year 1998.$1,118 Cell 2. Fiscal year 1999.$1,568 Cell 3. Fiscal year 2000.$1,128 Cell 4. Fiscal year 2001.$2,788 Cell 5. Fiscal year 2002.$2,708.2 Row 9. PLA, Biologic Applications.Cell 1. Fiscal year 1993.$1,078 Cell 2. Fiscal year 1994.$1,345 Cell 3. Fiscal year 1995.$1,369 Cell 4. Fiscal year 1996.$1,560 Cell 5. Fiscal year 1997.$1,194 Cell 6. Fiscal year 1998.$1,016 Cell 7. Fiscal year 1999.$1,426 Cell 8. Fiscal year 2000.$1,026 Row 10. ELA, Biologic Applications.Cell 1. Fiscal year 1993.$177 Cell 2. Fiscal year 1994.$221 Cell 3. Fiscal year 1995.$225 Cell 4. Fiscal year 1996.$256 Cell 5. Fiscal year 1997.$196 Cell 6. Fiscal year 1998.$167 Cell 7. Fiscal year 1999.$234 Cell 8. Fiscal year 2000.$168 Row 11. Supplement with Clinical Data, Biologic Applications.Cell 1. Fiscal year 1993.$561 Cell 2. Fiscal year 1994.$700 Cell 3. Fiscal year 1995.$713 Cell 4. Fiscal year 1996.$812 Cell 5. Fiscal year 1997.$622 Cell 6. Fiscal year 1998.$529 Cell 7. Fiscal year 1999.$742 Cell 8. Fiscal year 2000.$534 Cell 9. Fiscal year 2001.$195 Cell 10. Fiscal year 2002.$189.6 Row 12. Supplement without Clinical Data, Biologic Applications.Cell 1. Fiscal year 1993.$34 Cell 2. Fiscal year 1994.$42 Cell 3. Fiscal year 1995.$43 Cell 4. Fiscal year 1996.$49 Cell 5. Fiscal year 1997.$38 Cell 6. Fiscal year 1998.$32 Cell 7. Fiscal year 1999.$45 Cell 8. Fiscal year 2000.$32 Cell 9. Fiscal year 2001.$31 Cell 10. Fiscal year 2002.$29.8
1 Standard costs include all costs associated with application review, including rent, overhead, and centrally funded costs. Method revised in FY 2001-2002 based on KPMG study, and in 2003 on time reporting data. Time reporting method revised with better allocation of indirect cost beginning in 2004. |







