-
For Industry
-
Violation Code Translations
| Violation Code |
Section | Charge Statement |
|---|---|---|
| *** | 402(a)(5), 801(a)(3); ADULTERATION | The food appears to be, in whole or in part, the product of a diseased animal or of an animal which has died otherwise than be slaughter. |
| ADDED BULK | 402(b)(4), 801(a)(3); ADULTERATION | The food appears to have a substance added to, mixed or packed with it so as to increase its bulk or weight, or reduce its quality or strength, or make it appear better or of greater value than it is. |
| AFLATOXIN | 402(a)(1), 801(a)(3); ADULTERATION | The article appears to contain a mycotoxin, a poisonous and deleterious substance which may render it injurious to health. |
| AGR RX | 801(d)(1),(2); IMPORTATION RESTRICTED | The article appears to be a prescription drug manufactured in the U.S. and offered for import by other than the manufacturer and reimportation does not appear to have been authorized by the Secretary for use in a medical emergency. |
| AGRINSULIN | 801(d)(1),(2);IMPORTATION RESTRICTED | The article appears to be composed wholly or partly of insulin manufactured in the US and offered for import by other than the manufacturer and reimportation does not appear to have been authorized by the Secretary for a medical emergency |
| ALCOHOL | 402(d)(2), 801(a)(3); ADULTERATION | The article appears to be a confectionary that bears or contains alcohol in excess of 1/2 of 1% by volume derived solely from the use of flavoring extracts. |
| ALLERGEN | 403(w) 801(a)(3); Misbranding | the label fails to declare all major food allergens present in the product, as required by section 403(w)(1). |
| ANDRO | 402(f)(1)(B),801(a)(3);ADULTERATION | The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to section 801(a)(3) in that it appears to declare and/or contain androstenedione, a new dietary ingredient for which there is inadequate information to provide reasonable assurance that such ingredient does not present a significant or unreasonable risk of illness or injury [Adulteration, Section 402(f)(1)(B) |
| ANTIBIOTIC | 502(l), 801(a)(3); MISBRANDING | The drug appears to purport, or represented as, being composed wholly or partly of an antibiotic and it does not appear to be from a batch with respect to which a certificate or release has been issued pursuant to section 507. REPEALED11/97 |
| BACTERIA | 402(a)(1), 801(a)(3); ADULTERATION | The article appears to contain a poisonous and deleterious substance which may render it injurious to health. Contains |
| BANNED | 501(g), 801(a)(3); ADULTERATION | The article appears to be a banned device. |
| BIO TOXIN | 801 | |
| BIO TOXIN | 402(a)(1), 801(a)(3), Adulteration | The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to Section 801(a)(3) in that it appears to contain a poisonous and deleterious substance which would ordinarily render it injurious to health. Appears to contain |
| BSE DRUGS | 501(a)(2)(A), 801(a)(1); Adulteration | The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to Section 801(a)(1) in that it appears to have been prepared, packed or held under insanitary conditions whereby it may have been rendered injurious to health. |
| BSE FILTH | 402(a)(3), 801(a)(3); Adulteration | The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to Section 801(a)(3) in that it appears to be unfit for food. |
| BUTTER | 402(e), 801(a)(3); ADULTERATION | The article appears to be oleo/margarine or butter with raw materials consisting in whole or in part of a filthy, putrid, or decomposed substance or the article is otherwise be unfit for food. |
| CALIBRATED | 502(f)(1); 801(a)(3), misbranding | The article is subject to refusal in that it is calibrated in units not commonly used in the United States |
| CHLORAMP | 402(a)(2)(C)(i), 801(a)(3); ADULTERATION | The article appears to contain a food additive, namely chloramphenicol, that is unsafe within the meaning of 21 U.S.C. 348. |
| COL ADDED | 501(a)(4)(A), 801(a)(3); ADULTERATION | The article appears to bear or contain, for the purpose of coloring only, a color additive which is unsafe within the meaning of Section 721(a). |
| COLOR | 601% | |
| COLOR LBLG | 602(e), 801(a)(3); MISBRANDING | The color additive appears to not have its packaging and labeling in conformity with such requirements as issued under section 721. |
| COLOR LBLG | 403(k), 801(a)(3); MISBRANDING | The article appears to contain an artificial coloring and it fails to bear labeling stating that fact. |
| CONCEALED | 402(b)(3), 801(a)(3); ADULTERATION | It appears to be food which has damage or inferiority concealed in any manner. |
| CONTAINER | 402(a)(6), 801(a)(3); ADULTERATION | The container appears to be composed, in whole or in part, of a poisonous or deleterious substance which may render the contents injurious to health. |
| CONTAINER | 601(d), 801(a)(3); ADULTERATION | The container appears to be composed, in whole or in part, of a poisonous or deleterious substance which may render the contents injurious to health. |
| CONTAINER | 501(a)(3), 801(a)(3); ADULTERATION | The container appears to be composed, in whole or in part, of a poisonous or deleterious substance which may render the contents injurious to health. |
| CONTAM CAN | 402(a)(1), 801(a)(3); ADULTERATION | The article appears to be held in a container containing a poisonous or deleterious substance which may render it injurious to health. |
| COSM COLOR | 601(e), 801(a)(3); ADULTERATION | The cosmetic appears to not be a hair dye, and is, bears, or contains a color additive which is unsafe within the meaning of section 721(a). |
| COSM MISB | 602(a) & 801(a)(3); MISBRANDING | The cosmetic's labeling appears to be false or misleading within the meaning of Section 201(n). |
| COSM MISB2 | 602(a) & 801(a)(3); MISBRANDING | The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to Section 801(a)(3) in that it appears that its labeling is false or misleading in any particular [Misbranding, Section 602(a)]. |
| COSMETIC | 601(c), 801(a)(3); Adulteration | The article appears to be an ingredient in a cosmetic product and may have been prepared packed or held under insanitary conditions whereby it may have become contaminated with filth or rendered injurious to health. |
| COSMETLBLG | 5(c)(3)(A); 801(a)(3) Misbranding | It appears the label does not bear the common or usual name of the cosmetic. |
| COSMETLBLG | 5(c)(3)(B); 801(a)(3) Misbranding | It appears that the cosmetic consists of two or more ingredients and the label does not list the common or usual name of each ingredient. |
| COUMARIN | 402(a)(1), 801(a)(3), Adulteration | The article appears to bear or contain Coumarin, a poisonous or deleterious substance, which may render it injurious to health. |
| CSTIC LBLG | 602(a) and/or (b), and/or (c), 801(a)(3); MISBRANDING | The labeling appears to fail to comply with cosmetic labeling requirements of Section 602(a), and/or (b), and/or (c), and as identified by 21 C.F.R. Part 701. |
| CYCLAMATE | 402(a)(2)(C); 801(a)(3) | The article appears to bear or contain cyclamate, an unsafe food additive within the meaning of Section 409 |
| DANGEROUS | 502(j), 801(a)(3); MISBRANDING | The article appears to be dangerous to health when used in the dosage or manner, or with the frequency or duration, prescribed, recommended, or suggested in the labeling thereof. |
| DE IMP GMP | 801(a)(1); NON CONFORMING MANUFACTURING PRACTICES | The methods used in, or the facilities or controls used for the manufacture, packing, storage or installation do not conform to the requirements under section 520(f). |
| DE/RX KIT | 801(d)(1),(2); IMPORTATION RESTRICTED | The article appears to be a combination medical device/prescription drug kit for which the prescription drug component was manufactured in the U.S., is offered for import by other than the manufacturer, and reimportation does not appear to have been authorized by the Secretary for use in a medical emergency. |
| DEVICE GMP | 501(h), 801(a)(3); ADULTERATION | The methods, facilities, or controls used for the article's manufacture, packing, storage. or installation do not conform with applicable requirements under section 520(f)(1) or a condition prescribed by an order under section 520(f)(2). |
| DEVICEGMPS | 501(h), 801(a)(1); ADULTERATION | The methods, facilities, or controls used for the article's manufacture, packing, storage, or installation do not conform with applicable requirements under section 520(f)(1) or a condition prescribed by an order under section 520(f)(2). |
| DEVNOEXPT | 501(i), 801(a)(3) | |
| DIET INGRE | 402(a)(3), 801(a)(3); Adulteration | The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to Section 801(a)(3) in that it appears to be for use as an ingredient in a dietary supplement and appears to be or may be otherwise unfit for food. |
| DIETARY | 403(j), 801(a)(3); MISBRANDING | The article purports to be or is represented for special dietary uses and its label does not appear to bear the nutritional information required by regulation. |
| DIETARYLBL | 403(s)(2)(B), 801(a)(3), misbranded | The label/labeling of the dietary supplement fails to identify the product by using the term "dietary supplement". |
| DIOXIN | 402(a)(1),402(a)(2)(A),402(a)(2)(C)(i),801(a)(3)-Adulterated | The article appears to bear or contain dioxins and/or PCB compounds, poisonous or deleterious substances and/or unapproved food additives which may render it injurious to health. |
| DIRECTIONS | 502(f)(1), 801(a)(3); MISBRANDING | The article appears to lack adequate directions for use. |
| DIRSEXMPT | 502(f)(1), 801(a)(3); MISBRANDING | The article appears to lack adequate directions for use, and the article does not appear to be exempt from such requirements. |
| DISEASED | 402(a)(5), 801(a)(3); ADULTERATION | The food appears to be, in whole or in part, the product of a diseased animal or of an animal which has died otherwise than by slaughter. |
| DR QUALITC | 501(c), 801(a)(3); ADULTERATION | The drug appears to be represented as not being recognized in an official compendium and appears its strength differs from or its quality or purity falls below, that which it purports or is represented to possess. |
| DR QUALITY | 501(b), 801(a)(3); ADULTERATION | The article appears to be represented as a drug the name of which is recognized in an official compendium and its strength appears to differ from or its quality or purity appear to fall below the standards set forth in such compendium. |
| DR QUALITY | 501b | |
| DRUG COLOR | 502(m), 801(a)(3); MISBRANDING | The article appears to be a color additive the intended use of which is for the purpose of coloring only, and its packaging and labeling do not conform to regulations issued under section 721. |
| DRUG GMPS | 501(a)(2)(B), 801(a)(3); ADULTERATION | It appears that the methods used in or the facilities or controls used for manufacture, processing, packing, or holding do not conform to or are not operated or administered in conformity with current good manufacturing practices. |
| DRUG NAME | 502(e)(1); 801(a)(3); Misbranding | The article appears to be a drug and fails to bear the proprietary or established name and/or name and quantity of each active ingredient. |
| DULCIN | 402(a)(2)(C); 801(a)(3) | The article appears to bear or contain dulcin, an unsafe food additive within the meaning of Section 409 |
| DV NAME | 502(e)(2); 801(a)(3); Misbranding | The article appears to be a device and its labeling fails to bear the proprietary or established name. |
| DV QUALITY | 501(c); 801(a)(3) Adulteration | The article appears to be a device whose quality falls below that which it purports or is represented to possess. |
| EPHEDALK | 801(a)3), 402(f)(1); ADULTERATION | The product is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to Section 801(a)(3) in that it is a dietary supplement or a dietary ingredient that appears to contain ephedrine alkaloids, which presents an unreasonable risk of illness or injury under the conditions of use recommended or suggested in the labeling, or if no conditions of use are suggested in the labeling, under ordinary conditions of use. |
| EXCESS SUL | 402(a)(1), 801(a)(3); ADULTERATION | The article appears to contain excessive sulfites, a poisonous and deleterious substance which may render it injurious to health. |
| EXPIRED | 501(c); 801(a)(3) Adulteration | the product strength differs from, or its purity or quality falls below, that which it purports or is represented to possess in that it is past its labeled expiration date. |
| FAILS STD | 501(e), 801(a)(3); ADULTERATION | The article appears to be a device which is subject to a performance standard established under Section 514 and does not appear to be in all respects in conformity with such standard. |
| FALSE | 502(a), 801(a)(3); MISBRANDING | The labeling for this article appears to be false or misleading |
| FALSE | 403(a)(1), 801(a)(3); MISBRANDING | the labeling appears to be false and misleading in any particular. |
| FALSECAT | 403(t), 801(a)(3) | The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to section 801(a)(3) in that it appears to be misbranded because it purports to be or is represented as catfish but is not a fish classified within the family Ictaluridae. |
| FEED & NAD | 501(a)(6), 801(a)(3); ADULTERATION | The article appears to be an animal feed bearing or containing a new animal drug, and such animal feed is unsafe within the meaning of section 512. |
| FILTH | 601(b), 801(a)(3); ADULTERATION | The cosmetic appears to consist in whole or in part of any filthy, putrid, or decomposed substance. |
| FILTHY | 402(a)(3), 801(a)(3); ADULTERATION | The article appears to consist in whole or in part of a filthy, putrid, or decomposed substance or be otherwise unfit for food. |
| FLAVR LBLG | 403(k), 801(a)(3); MISBRANDING | The article appears to contain an artificial flavoring and it fails to bear labeling stating that fact. |
| FLUOROCARB | 402(a)(2)(A), 801(a)(3); ADULTERATION | The article appears to contain chloroflurocarbons in violation of 21 CFR 2.125. |
| FLUOROCARB | 501(a)(5), 801(a)(3); ADULTERATION | The article appears to be a new animal drug containing chloroflurocarbons in violation of 21 CFR 2.125. |
| FLUOROCARB | 601(a), 801(a)(3); ADULTERATION | The article appears to contain chloroflurocarbons in violation of 21 CFR Part 2.125. |
| FORBIDDEN | 801(a)(2); FORBIDDEN OR RESTRICTED IN SALE | The article appears to be forbidden or restricted in sale in the country in which it was produced or from which it was exported. |
| FOREIGN OB | 402(a)(3), 801(a)(3); ADULTERATION | The article appears to consist in whole or in part of a filthy, putrid, or decomposed substance, or is otherwise unfit for food in that it appears to contain foreign objects. |
| FRNMFGREG | 502(o), 801(a)(3); MISBRANDING | The foreign manufacturer has not registered as required by section 510(i)(1) |
| GINSENG | 402(a)(2)(C), 801(a)(3); ADULTERATION | The article appears to bear or contain "Ginseng", a food additive which is unsafe within the meaning of Section 409. |
| HEALTH C | 801(a)(3); 403(r)(1)(A)/(B) misbranding | The article appears to be misbranded in that the label or labeling bears an unauthorized nutrient content/health claim. |
| HELD INSAN | 601(c), 801(a)(3); ADULTERATION | The cosmetic appears to have been prepared, packed, or held under insanitary conditions whereby it may have become contaminated with filth, or whereby it may have been rendered injurious to health. |
| HEPATITISA | Section 801(a)(3), 402(a)(1); ADULTERATION | The article appears to contain Hepatitis A Virus, a poisonous or deleterious substance which may render it injurious to health. |
| HISTAMINE | 402(a)(1), 801(a)(3); Adulteration | The article appears to bear or contain histamine, a poisonous and deleterious substance in such quantity as ordinarily renders it injurious to health. |
| HOLES | 501(c); 801(a)(3) Adulteration | The quality of the article falls below that which it purports or is represented to possess, in that the devices contain defects/holes. |
| IMBED OBJT | 402(d)(1), 801(a)(3); ADULTERATION | The article appears to be a confectionary that has partially or completely imbedded therein any nonnutritive object. |
| IMITATION | 403(c), 801(a)(3); MISBRANDING | The article appears to be an imitation of another food, and the label does not bear in type of uniform size and prominence, the word "imitation" and immediately thereafter, the name of the food imitated. |
| IMPTRHACCP | 801(a)(3) , 402(a)(4) Adulteration | The food appears to have been prepared, packed or held under insanitary conditions, or may have become injurious to health, due to the failure of the importer to provide verification of compliance pursuant to 21 CFR 123.12(d). |
| INCONSPICU | 403(f), 801(a)(3); MISBRANDING | Information required by the Act to be on the label or labeling does not appear to be conspicuous enough as to render it likely to be read and understood by the ordinary individual under customary conditions of purchase and use. |
| INCONSPICU | 502(c), 801(a)(3); MISBRANDING | Information required by the Act to be on the label or labeling does not appear to be conspicuous enough as to render it likely to be read and understood by the ordinary individual under customary conditions of purchase and use. |
| INGRED FIL | 402(a)(4), 801(a)(3); Adulteration | The article appears to be an ingredient in a dietary supplement and may have been prepared packed or held under insanitary conditions whereby it may have become contaminated with filth or rendered injurious to health. |
| INSAN BSE | 402(a)(4), 801(a)(3); Adulteration | The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to Section 801(a)(3) in that it appears to have been prepared, packed or held under insanitary conditions whereby it may have been rendered injurious to health. |
| INSANITARY | 501(a)(2)(A), 801(a)(3); ADULTERATION | The article appears to have been prepared, packed or held under insanitary conditions whereby it may have been contaminated with filth, or whereby it may have been rendered injurious to health. |
| INSANITARY | 402(a)(4), 801(a)(3); ADULTERATION | The article appears to have been prepared, packed, or held under insanitary conditions whereby it may have become contaminated with filth, or whereby it may have been rendered injurious to health. |
| INSULIN | 502(k), 801(a)(3); MISBRANDING | The drug appears to purport, or represented as, being composed wholly or partly of insulin and it does not appear to be from a batch with respect to which a certificate or release has been issued pursuant to section 506.REPEALED 11/97 |
| INVDEVICE | 501(i), 801(a)(3); ADULTERATION | The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to Section 801(a)(3) in that it appears to be a device for investigational use for which no exemption has been granted as prescribed by Section 520(g) |
| JUICE % | 403(i)(2), 801(a)(3); MISBRANDING | It appears the food is a beverage containing vegetable or fruit juice and does not bear a statement on the label in appropriate prominence on the information panel of the total percentage of such fruit or vegetable juice contained therein. |
| LABELING | Section 4(a); 801(a)(3) Misbranding | The article appears in violation of FPLA because of its placement, form and/or contents statement. |
| LACK NOTIF | 301(s) | Adulterated, 801(a)(3), lack of documentation establishing that the infant formula meets all notification conditions required by 412(c) or 412(d), Prohibited Act, Section 301(s). |
| LACKS FIRM | 403(e)(1), 801(a)(3); MISBRANDING | The food is in package form and appears to not bear a label containing the name and place of business of the manufacturer, packer, or distributor. |
| LACKS FIRM | 502(b)(1), 801(a)(3); MISBRANDING | The article is in package form and appears to not bear a label containing the name and place of business of the manufacturer, packer, or distributor. |
| LACKS N/C | 403(e)(2), 801(a)(3); MISBRANDING | The food is in package form and appears to not have a label containing an accurate statement of the quantity of the contents in terms of weight, measure or numerical count and no variations or exemptions have been prescribed by regulations. |
| LACKS N/C | 502(b)(2), 801(a)(3); MISBRANDING | The article is in package form and appears to not have a label containing an accurate statement of the quantity of the contents in terms of weight, measure or numerical count and no variations or exemptions have been prescribed by regs. |
| LBL STEEL | 502(a); 801(a)(3); Misbranding | The labeling for this article appears to be false or misleading: labeling suggests it is composed of stainless steel, but it doesn't meet standard requirements for the appropriate type of stainless steel. |
| LBLG ADVER | 502(a), 201(n) and 801(a)(3) Misbranding | The art apprs misbranded because its lblg is misledg namely it fails to reveal facts (non-sterility) that are material w/respect to consequences frm the use of the art accordg to lblg or advertisg or undercondtns of customary or usual use |
| LEAK/SWELL | 402(a)(3), 801(a)(3); ADULTERATION | The article appears to be held in swollen containers or contains micro leaks. |
| LENS CERT | 502(a), 801(a)(3); MISBRANDING | The lenses are declared by accompanying certificate to meet the requirements for impact-resistant lenses in 21 CFR 801.410 but does not appear to be impact-resistant. |
| LIST INGRE | 403(i)(2), 801(a)(3); MISBRANDING | It appears the food is fabricated from two or more ingredients and the label does not list the common or usual name of each ingredient. |
| LISTERIA | 402(a)(1), 801(a)(3); ADULTERATION | The article appears to contain Listeria, a poisonous and deleterious substance which may render it injurious to health. |
| MELAMINE | 402(a)(1), 801(a)(3), Adulteration | The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to Section 801(a)(3) in that it appears to bear or contain a food additive, namely melamine and/or a melamine analog, that is unsafe within the meaning of Section 409 [Adulteration, Section 402(a)(2)(C)(i)] |
| MELAMINE | 402(a)(2)(C)(i), 801(a)(3); ADULTERATION | The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to Section 801(a)(3) in that it appears to bear or contain a food additive, namely melamine and/or a melamine analog, that is unsafe within the meaning of section 409 [Adulteration, section 402(a)(2)(C)(i)]. |
| MELAMINE | 402(a)(2)(C)(i), 801(a)(3); ADULTERATION | The article is subject to refusal of admission in that it appears to bear or contain a food additive, namely melamine and/or a melamine analog, that is unsafe within the meaning of section 409. |
| MFR INSAN | 801(a)(1); INSANITARY MANUFACTURING, PROCESSING OR PACKING | The article appears to have been manufactured, processed, or packed under insanitary conditions. |
| MFRHACCP | 402(a)(4), 801(a)(3) | The product appears to have been prepared, packed, or held under insanitary conditions, or it may be injurious to health, due to failure of the foreign processor to comply with 21 CFR 123. |
| N-RX INACT | 502(e)(1); 801(a)(3); Misbranding | The article appears to be a nonprescription drug and fails to bear the established name of each inactive ingredient in alphabetical order on the outside container of the retail package. |
| NEEDS ACID | 402(a)(4), 801(a)(3); ADULTERATION | The food appears to have been prepared, packed, or held under insanitary conditions, or it may have been rendered injurious to health due to inadequate acidification. |
| NEEDS FCE | 402(a)(4), 801(a)(3); ADULTERATION | It appears the manufacturer is not registered as a low acid canned food or acidified food manufacturer pursuant to 21 CFR 108.25(c)(1) or 108.35(c)(1). |
| NEW VET DR | 501(a)(5), 801(a)(3); ADULTERATION | The article appears to be a new animal drug which is unsafe within the meaning of Section 512(a) in that there is not in effect an approval of an applications filed with respect to its intended use or uses. |
| NITROFURAN | 402(a)(2)(C)(i), 801(a)(3); Adulteration | The article is subject to refusal of admission in that it appears to bear or contain a food additive, namely nitrofurans, that is unsafe. |
| NO 510(K) | 801(a)(3); 502(o) Misbranding | It appears that a notice or other information respecting the device was not provided to FDA, as required by Section 510(k) and the device was not found to be substantially equivalent to a predicate device. |
| NO ENGLISH | 403(f), 801(a)(3); MISBRANDING | Required label or labeling appears to not be in English per 21 CFR 101.15(c). |
| NO ENGLISH | 502(c); 801(a)(3) ;MISBRANDING | Required label or labeling appears to not be in English in violation of 21 C.F.R. 201.15(c)(1). |
| NO ENGLISH | 502(c); 801(a)(3);Misbranding | Required label or labeling appears to not be in English in violation of 21 C.F.R. 801.15(c)(1) |
| NO LICENSE | 502(f)(1), 801(a)(3); MISBRANDING & PHS BIOL. ACT 351 | The article appears to be a biological product not manufactured at an establishment holding an unsuspended and unrevoked license issued under the Public Health Service Act, Biological Products section 351. |
| NO PERMIT | 1, 2; PROHIBITION WITHOUT PERMIT | The article of milk or cream is not accompanied by a valid import milk permit, as required by the Federal Import Milk Act (21 U.S.C. 141-149). |
| NO PMA | 501(f)(1)(B), 801(a)(3); ADULTERATION | The article appears to be a class III device without an approved application for premarket approval pursuant to section 515(a). |
| NO PMA/PDP | 501(f)(1)(A); 801(a)(3); ADULTERATION | The article appears to be a class III dev.w/o an approved applic. for premarket approval, and/or a notice of completion of product development protocol filed per sect.515(b) or exempt per sect.520(g)(1). [Adulteration, Section 501(f)(1)(A)] |
| NO PROCESS | 402(a)(4), 801(a)(3); ADULTERATION | It appears that the manufacturer has not filed information on its scheduled process as required by 21 CFR 108.25(c)(2) or 108.35(c)(2). |
| NO REGISTR | 536(a); Failure to file initial report | The article appears to be an electronic product that does not comply with an applicable standard as prescribed by Section 534 because no reporting has been provided as required by Section 537(b). |
| NO TAG | 536(a),(b); NOT CERTIFIED | It appears that the article does not have affixed to it a certification in the form of a label or tag in conformity with section 534(h). |
| NOCONTCODE | 402(a)(4), 801(a)(3); ADULTERATION | The low acid or acidified food appears to have been prepared, packed, or held under insanitary conditions, or it may be injurious to health, due to failure to mark with a permanent container code pursuant to 21 CFR 113.60(c) or 114.80(b). |
| NON STD | 536(a),(b); NON STANDARD | It appears that the article fails to comply with applicable standards prescribed under section 534. |
| NONNUT SUB | 402(d)(3), 801(a)(3); ADULTERATION | The article appears to be confectionery and it bears or contains a nonnutritive substance. |
| NONRSP-PRC | 402(a)(4), 801(a)(3); ADULTERATION | The article appears to have been prepared or packed under insanitary conditions whereby it may have been rendered injurious to health due to inadequate processing in that the scheduled process filed by the manufacturer pursuant to 21 CFR 108.35(c)(2) appears to be inadequate to protect the public health. |
| NONRSP-VER | 402(a)(4), 801(a)(3); ADULTERATION | The article appears to have been prepared or packed under insanitary conditions whereby it may have been rendered injurious to health due to inadequate processing in that the scheduled process filed by the manufacturer pursuant to 21 CFR 108.35 (c)(2) appears to be inadequate to protect the public health. |
| NONSTEEL | 502(a) and/or 502(f)(1); Misbranding | Labeling appears false or misleading or fails to bear adequate directions for use,because the article appears to be misrepresented as a disposable single use instrument when it is intended for use as a stainless steel multi-use instrument. |
| NOT IMPACT | 501(c), 801(a)(3); ADULTERATION | The article appears to not have impact-resistant lenses in accordance with 21 CFR 801.410. |
| NOT LISTED | 502(o), 801(a)(3); MISBRANDING | It appears the drug or device is not included in a list required by Section 510(j), or a notice or other information respecting it was not provided as required by section 510(j) or 510(k). |
| NUTR DEF | 412(a)(1), 801(a)(3); Adulterated | the infant formula appears to adulterated in that it does not provide the nutrients required by 21 CFR 107.100 |
| NUTR UNIT | 403(f), 801(a)(3); MISBRANDED | The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to Section 801(a)(3) in that the infant formula appears to be misbranded within the meaning of Section 403 in that the labeling fails to use the proper units to declare the nutrients as specified in 21 CFR 107.10 [Misbranded, Section 403(f)]. |
| NUTRIT LBL | 403(q); 801(a)(3); Misbranding | The article appears to be misbranded in that the label or labeling fails to bear the required nutrition information. |
| OFF ODOR | 402(a)(3), 801(a)(3); ADULTERATION | The article appears to consist in whole or in part of a filthy, putrid, or decomposed substance or be otherwise unfit for food. Contains an off odor. |
| OMITTED | 402(b)(1), 801(a)(3); ADULTERATION | It appears that a valuable constituent of the article has been in whole or in part omitted or abstraced from the article. |
| OPTION ING | 403(g)(2), 801(a)(3); MISBRANDING | It appears to be a food for which a definition and standard of identity have been prescribed by regulations under section 401 and appears to not be labelled with the common names of the optional ingredients specified therein. |
| PATULIN | 402(a)(1), 801(a)(3); ADULTERATION | The article appears to contain patulin, a poisonous and deleterious substance which may render it injurious to health. |
| PB-FOOD | 402(a)(1); 801(a)(3); Adulteration | The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to Section 801(a)(3) in that it appears to contain a poisonous or deleterious substance, lead, which may render it injurious to health. |
| PERSONALRX | 502(a) & (f)(1), 801(a)(3); MISBRANDING | The article appears to be a drug which requires a prescription from your doctor. |
| PESTICIDE | 402(a)(2)(B), 801(a)(3); ADULTERATION | The article appears to be a raw agricultural commodity that bears or contains a pesticide chemical which is unsafe within the meaning of Section 408(a). |
| PESTICIDES | 402(a)(2)(B), 802(a)(B); ADULTERATION | The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to section 801(a)(3) in that it appears to be adulterated because it contains a pesticide chemical, which is in violation of section 402(a)(2)(B). Contains: |
| POIS CHLOR | 402(a)(1), 801(a)(3); ADULTERATION | The article appears to contain a poisonous or deleterious substance, namely chloramphenicol, which may render it injurious to health. |
| POISON PKG | 502(p), 801(a)(3); MISBRANDING | The article appears to be a drug and its packaging and labeling is in violation of an applicable regulation issued pursuant to section 3 or 4 of the Poison Prevention Packaging Act of 1970. |
| POISONOUS | 402(a)(1), 801(a)(3); ADULTERATION | The article appears to contain a poisonous or deleterious substance which may render it injurious to health. |
| POISONOUS | 601(a), 801(a)(3); ADULTERATION | The cosmetic appears to bear or contain a poisonous or deleterious substance which may render it injurious to users under the conditions prescribed in the labeling thereof, or, under such conditions of use as are customary or usual. |
| POSS N/STR | 501(a)(1); 801(a)(3) ADULTERATION | The article appears to consist in whole or in part of any filthy, putrid, or decomposed substance, namely, potentially infectious organisms |
| PRESRV LBL | 403(k), 801(a)(3); MISBRANDING | The article appears to contain a chemical preservative and it fails to bear labeling stating that fact including its function. |
| RADIONUC | 402(a)(1); 801(a)(3); Adulteration | Article appears to contain the radionuclide, Cesium-137, a poisonous and deleterious substance which may render it injurious to health. |
| RECORDS | 502(t), 801(a)(3); MISBRANDING | The article appears to be a device and the requirements under 518 or to furnish any material or information required by or under section 519 respecting a device were not met. |
| REDUCED | 501(d)(1), 801(a)(3); ADULTERATION | It appears to be a drug that a substance has been mixed or packed with so as to reduce its strength. |
| REGISTERED | 502(o), 801(a)(3); MISBRANDING | It appears the device is subject to listing under 510(j) and the initial distributor has not registered as required by 21 CFR 807.20 (a)(4). |
| REJECT TEA | 1 (21USC41); PROHIBITED TEA | The article is inferior in purity, quality, and fitness for consumption to the standards provided in section 43.TEA ACT REPEALED! |
| RX DEVICE | 502(a),(f)(1), 801(a)(3); MISBRANDING | The article appears to be a prescription device without a prescription device legend as required by 21 CFR 801.109. |
| RX LEGEND | 502(a) & (f)(1), 801(a)(3); MISBRANDING | The article appears to be a prescription drug without a prescription drug legend as required by Section 503(b)(4). |
| RXCOMPOUND | 503(b)(4)(A) & 502(c), 801(a)(3); MISBRANDING | the labeling fails to bear, at a minimum, the symbol "Rx only." |
| RXPERSONAL | 502(a), 502(f)(1), 801(a)(3), MISBRANDING | The article appears to be a device which requires a prescription from your doctor. |
| SACCHARIN | 403(o); 801(a)(3) Misbranded | The article contains Saccharin, a non-nutritive sweetner, and its label or labeling fails to bear the required warning statement. |
| SACCHARLBL | 403(i); 803(a)(3) Misbranding | The article contains Saccharin, a non-nutritive sweetener, and its label or labeling fails to list it as an added ingredient |
| SALMONELLA | 402(a)(1), 801(a)(3); ADULTERATION | The article appears to contain Salmonella, a poisonous and deleterious substance which may render it injurious to health. |
| SBGINSENG | 801(a)(3); 403(u) Misbranding | The article is subject to refusal of admission in that it appears to be Misbranded because it or its ingredients purport to be or are represented as Ginseng, but are not an herb or herbal ingredient derived from a plant classified within the genus Panax. |
| SHIGELLA | 402(a)(1), 801(a)(3); ADULTERATION | The article appears to contain Shigella, a poisonous and deleterious substance which may render it injurious to health. |
| SOAKED/WET | 402(a)(4), 801(a)(3); ADULTERATION | The article appears to have been prepared, packed, or held under insanitary conditions whereby it may have become contaminated with filth, or whereby it may have been rendered injurious to health in that it appears to been held in water. |
| STAINSTEEL | 501(c); 801(a)(3) Adulteration | The article appears to be a device whose quality falls below that which it purports or is represented to possess, in that instrument is represented as stainless steel but does not meet requirements for such steel for surgical instruments. |
| STARANISE | 402(a)(2)(C)(i), 801(a)(3), Adulteration | The article appears to bear or contain a food additive, Japanese star anise, that is unsafe within the meaning of section 409. |
| STD FILL | 403(h)(2), 801(a)(3); MISBRANDING | The article appears to be represented as a food for which a standard of fill of container has been prescribed by regulations as provided by section 401 and it appears it falls below the standard of fill and its label does not so indicate. |
| STD IDENT | 403(g)(1), 801(a)(3); MISBRANDING | The food appears to be represented as a food for which a definition and standard of identity have been prescribed by regulations as provided by section 401 and the food does not appear to conform to such definition and standard. |
| STD LABEL | 502(s), 801(a)(3); MISBRANDING | The article appears to not bear labeling prescribed by the performance standard established under section 514. |
| STD NAME | 403(g)(2), 801(a)(3); MISBRANDING | It appears to be a food for which a definition and standard of identity have been prescribed by regulations under section 401 and appears to not be labelled with the name specified in the definition and standard. |
| STD QUALIT | 403(h)(1), 801(a)(3); MISBRANDING | The article appears to be represented as a food for which a standard of quality has been prescribed by regulation as provided by Sec. 401 and it appears its quality falls below such standard and its label does not so indicate. |
| STERILITY | 501(a)(2)(A), 801(a)(3); ADULTERATION | The article appears to have been prepared, packed or held under insanitary conditions whereby it may have been contaminated with filth, or whereby it may have been rendered injurious to health. |
| STERILITY | 501(a)(1), 801(a)(3); ADULTERATION | The article appears to consist in whole or in part of any filthy, putrid, or decomposed substance. |
| SUBSTITUTE | 402(b)(2), 801(a)(3); ADULTERATION | It appears that a substance has been substituted wholly or in part for one or more of the article's ingredients. |
| SUBSTITUTE | 501(d)(2), 801(a)(3); ADULTERATION | It appears to be a drug that a substance has been substituted wholly or in part. |
| SULFITELBL | 403(a)(1), 801(a)(3) ;MISBRANDING | The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to section 801(a)(3) in that it appears to be misbranded because 1) it appears to contain sulfites but the label fails to declare the presence of sulfites, a fact material to sulfite-sensitive individuals who must avoid the ingredient due to potential health consequences from its consumption [Misbranded, 403(a)(1)], and 2) it appears the food is fabricated from two or more ingredients and the label does not list the common or usual name of each ingredient [Misbranded, 403(i)(2)]. |
| TAMPERING | 501(a)(2)(B), 801(a)(3); ADULTERATION | It appears that the packing does not conform with current good manufacturing practices under 21 CFR 211.132 for tamper-resistant packaging. |
| TISSUE | 361 | This human cell, tissue, and cellular and tissue-based product is in violation of Section 361 of the Public Health Service Act. |
| TRANSFAT | 403(q), 801(a)(3) ;MISBRANDING | The product is misbranded under Section 403(q) because the nutrition label does not provide all of the information required by 21 CFR 101.9(c); specifically, the label does not bear the amount of trans fat [21 CFR 101.9(c)(2)(ii)]. |
| UNAPPROVED | 505(a), 801(a)(3); UNAPPROVED NEW DRUG | The article appears to be a new drug without an approved new drug application. |
| UNDER PRC | 402(a)(4), 801(a)(3); ADULTERATION | The article appears to have inadequate processing in having been prepared, packed, or held under insanitary conditions whereby it may have been rendered injurious to health. |
| UNFIT4FOOD | 402(a)(3), 801(a)(3); ADULTERATION | The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to section 801(a)(3) in that it appears to be unfit for food [Adulteration, 402(a)(3)] |
| UNSAFE ADD | 402(a)(2)(C)(i), 801(a)(3); ADULTERATION | The article appears to bear or contain a food additive which is unsafe within the meaning of Section 409. Contains |
| UNSAFE COL | 402(c), 801(a)(3); ADULTERATION | The article appears to be, or to bear or contain a color additive which is unsafe within the meaning of Section 721(a). |
| UNSAFE COL | 501(a)(4)(B), 801(a)(3); ADULTERATION | The article appears to be a color additive for the purposes of coloring only in or on drugs or devices, and is unsafe within the meaning of Section 721(a). |
| UNSAFE SUB | 402(a)(2)(A), 801(a)(3); ADULTERATION | The article appears to bear or contain a substance which is unsafe within the meaning of Section 406. |
| UNSFDIETLB | 402(f)(1)(A), 801(a)(3) Adulteration | The article appears to be a dietary supplement or contain a dietary ingredient that presents a significant or unreasonable risk of illness or injury under the conditions of use set out in the labeling or, if none are set out in the labeling, under customary conditions of use. |
| UNSFDIETSP | 402(f)(1)(B), 801(a)(3) Adulteration | The article appears to be a dietary supplement or ingredient for which there is inadequate information to provide reasonable assurance that such ingredient does not present a significant or unreasonable risk of illness or injury. |
| UNSFDIETUS | 402(f)(1)(D), 801(a)(3) Adulteration | The article is or contains a dietary supplement that renders it adulterated under paragraph (a)(1) under conditions of use recommended or suggested in the labeling of such dietary supplement. |
| USUAL NAME | 403(i)(1), 801(a)(3); MISBRANDING | It appears that the label does not bear the common or usual name of the food. |
| VET LEGEND | 502(a) & (f)(1), 801(a)(3); MISBRANDING | The article appears to be a veterinary drug without the "Caution" statement as required by Section 503(f)(4). |
| VETDRUGRES | 402(a)(2)(C)(ii); 801(a)(3); ADULTERATION | The article appears to contain a new animal drug (or conversion product thereof) that is unsafe within the meaning of section 512. Product contains |
| VIBRIO | 402(a)(1), 801(a)(3); ADULTERATION | The article appears to contain Vibrio Cholerae, a poisonous and deleterious substance which may render it injurious to health. |
| VITAMN LBL | 403(a)(2), 801(a)(3); MISBRANDING | The food appears to be subject to section 411 and its advertising is false or misleading in a material respect or its labeling is in violation of section 411(b)(2). |
| WARNINGS | 502(f)(2), 801(a)(3); MISBRANDING | It appears to lack adequate warning against use in a pathological condition or by children where it may be dangerous to health or against an unsafe dose, method, administering duration, application, in manner/form, to protect users. |
| WRONG IDEN | 403(b), 801(a)(3); MISBRANDING | The article appears to be offered for sale under the name of another food. |
| YELLOW #5 | 402(c), 403(m), 801(a)(3); ADULTERATION, MISBRANDING | The food appears to bear or contain the color additive FD & C Yellow No. 5, which is not declared on the label per 21 CFR 74.705 under section 721. |
-
-

