Antigen/Antibody Detection Assays for Malaria
A CDRH Perspective
Freddie M. Poole
Division of Microbiology Devices OIVD, CDRH
- Discuss Regulatory Background
- Types of information needed
- Requirements for clinical studies for IVD antigen/antibody detection assays
- Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, 1938
- Medical Device Amendment, 1976
- Section 513 (a) (1)
- Safe Medical Devices Act, 1990
- FDA Modernization Act, 1997
Class I Devices
- General Controls - E.g. GMP's, Registration & Listing, record keeping
- Test result does not to support life or prevent impairment of health.
- Test result does not present unreasonable a risk of illness or injury.
Class II Devices
- General Controls are insufficient.
- Special Controls - E.g., Guidance documents, labeling regulations, (21 CFR 809.10), standards.
Class III Devices
- Test is critical in the diagnosis of disease.
- Test results presents a risk of misdiagnosis, which leads to illness or injury.
- Valid Scientific evidence is required - i.e., well controlled clinical trials.
Devices for Detection of Plasmodium Antigen or Antibody
- Test results are of substantial importance in diagnosis and treatment of a life-threatening illness.
- Currently, Class III devices requiring a PMA
QBC System.Not a Predicate
- 1982 QBC System was cleared for HCT, HGB, WBC, Granulocytes, Lymphocytes determination. This was a Class III Automated Differential Cell Counter device.
- 1989 QBC System was modified to add the QBC Malaria Tube. The QBT Malaria tube was cleared for qualitative detection of acridine orange stained parasites.
Type of Malaria Antigen Assays in Published Literature
Monoclonal and Polyclonal antibodies raised against excretory/secretory antigens.
- Pf 9, heat-stable antigen
- Pf HRP-2 histidine - rich protein
- IFA, IHA, ELISA
- DNA Probes
- None approved by FDA
What we require
- Characterization of components, description of antigen, antibody, controls, etc.
- Limits of Detection of the assay
- Setting of Cutoff values
- Cross Reactivity - with other Plasmodium spp, other parasitemias.
- Interference - from endogenous and exogenous substances.
- Stability - should also stress storage and shipping conditions.
- Must demonstrate safety and effectiveness
- Support the Intended Use, i.e., indications and conditions for use.
- Probable benefit of the test results should outweigh any foreseeable misdiagnosis.
- Unified Multi-site Study Protocol
- Foreign Studies - Declaration of Helsinki
- Clearly defined populations (endemic, and non-endemic)
- Clear description of disease status - how defined. (Gold Std: Thin & thick blood smears)
- Clinical Protocol: description of all methodologies used, exclusion, inclusion criteria, quality control )
The populations tested should include patients with microscopic or other evidence of Plasmodium spp. other than those detected by assay, other parasitemias, other conditions with similar symptoms.
Validation of Cutoff Values
- Clinical studies: validate cutoff values are appropriate for the target population.
- Should represent the spectrum of patients presenting with early or fulminant disease.
Studies should provide an adequate representation of cases, subtypes, co-infection (95% CI)
- FDA statisticians would comment on appropriate models.
For More Information:
- Submit a pre-IDE
- Contact us
Division of Microbiology Devices
2098 Gaither Road
Rockville, MD 20850